Continuous improvement evaluation process purpose

In 1999, the Board of Commissions established an Oversight Task Force for the Accreditation Process Improvement (API) Initiative. The purpose is to oversee the continuous improvement in the accreditation process. The resulting changes are intended to enhance the evaluation of critical patient safety and patient care functions and to achieve an accreditation process that remains consultative and focused on performance improvement. A white paper was published outlining a future operational model that will continue to build and expand on technology, performance data, presurvey self-assessments, a fully automated interface with JCAHO, increased surveyor development, and a more continuous accreditation process. Instead of a once every 3 years site visit, two 18-month site visits would occur that evaluate select standards. In addition, since health care entities are so diverse, there is a desire to create a model that is more data driven, less predictable, and more customized to an individual organization. 

Feedback from the evaluation survey was useful for providing insights into the perception of the purpose of OHS MS in the workplace As a general statement most of the OHS system is focused on being a defensive document. .. rather than trying to continually improve safety. For me there are two main components to safe operation the safety you can build into the process. .. and the safe behaviours we bring to the operation. .. the ideal system would be a balance of both of these philosophies. ... 

When applying the PDCA continual improvement process, an important step is to determine whether the management systems put in place achieve what is intended. That is the purpose of ZlO s Section 6.0—to provide an evaluation mechanism so that deficiencies in the systems may be identified and acted on. This is an important continual improvement function. 

There are many different approaches to self-evaluation and inclusion, with a range of tools, performance indicators and targets available to schools. It is important to adopt a self-evaluation strategy and a range of tools which best fit the nature and context of your school. Self-evaluation is about helping schools ensure continuous improvement and should not be undertaken solely for the purpose of inspection OFSTED recognises the importance of self-evaluation as a continuous process that is complemented from time to time by external inspection Every Child Matters - Framework for the Inspection of Schools in England from September 2005 - OFSTED, 2005). 

Our study proposes a process involving a four-step model for DQ analysis with the purpose of improving the safety aspects of WSNs. The first step is the identification of interesting quality dimensions in the imderlying process. The second step is the measurement of those dimensions, either objectively or subjectively. The third step is an evaluation of those measurements hy checking their coherence against predefined attributes. Finally, the fourth step involves the decisive actions to he executed in order to ensure continual system improvement. 

---