Contact bundle

TFIIA also has two domains, one of which is a four-helix bundle and the other an antiparallel p sandwich. The p sandwich interacts with the N-termi-nal half of TBP and thus positions TFIIA on the other side of the complex compared with TFIIB. This domain also interacts with phosphates and sugars of DNA upstream of the TATA box. Tbe four-helix bundle domain makes no contact with DNA or TBP and is far removed from the position of TFIIB. 

Early transport measurements on individual multi-wall nanotubes [187] were carried out on nanotubes with too large an outer diameter to be sensitive to ID quantum effects. Furthermore, contributions from the inner constituent shells which may not make electrical contact with the current source complicate the interpretation of the transport results, and in some cases the measurements were not made at low enough temperatures to be sensitive to 1D effects. Early transport measurements on multiple ropes (arrays) of single-wall armchair carbon nanotubes [188], addressed general issues such as the temperature dependence of the resistivity of nanotube bundles, each containing many single-wall nanotubes with a distribution of diameters d/ and chiral angles 6. Their results confirmed the theoretical prediction that many of the individual nanotubes are metallic. 

Song et al. [16] reported results relative to a four-point resistivity measurement on a large bundle of carbon nanotubes (60 um diameter and 350 tm in length between the two potential contacts). They explained their resistivity, magnetoresistance, and Hall effect results in terms of a conductor that could be modeled as a semimetal. Figures 4 (a) and (b) show the magnetic field dependence they observed on the high- and low-temperature MR, respectively. 

Some explanations could be possible for these contradictory results. One is that a various types of CNTs may be obtained by different methods, since SWCNTs as much as 50 % are chiral and nonmetallic [42]. The other is that the result may be attributable to the contact condition of SWCNT bundles. When the bundles closely contact each other, the SWCNT system will likely become a three-dimensional one just as in the case of contacted MWCNTs. 

In tube bundles, if the disengaging space between the bundle and the kettle is small and insufficient to allow the vapor bubbles to break-free of the liquid and thus tend to blanket the upper tubes with gas, heat transfer will be restricted. For best design the superficial vapor velocity should be in the range of 0.6-1.0 ft/sec to prevent the bubbles from blanketing the tube through the bundle and thereby preventing liquid contact with the tubes. When the maximum heat flux is approached, this condition can occur, so the 1.0 ft/sec vapor velocity is recommended. 

Stress fibers are parallel bundles of actin filaments that develop in the cytoplasm of fibroblasts from the cortical actin network in response to mechanical tension. These often bind to the plasma membrane at focal contacts and, through transmembrane linker glycoproteins, to the extracellular matrix. Thus, actin filaments of stress fibers indirectly Join to the inner face of the plasma membrane through molecular assemblies of attachment proteins, which include an actin-capping protein, a-actinin, vinculin, and talin (Small, 1988). 

In any state preceding the onset of crystallization at T < To we assume that bundle stability is favored by localized attractive interactions between contacting (short) stems, some enthalpy advantage being balanced by a corresponding entropy loss (see Fig. 3). Depending upon the core structure of the crystalline stems, various bundle models were examined [8,9]. In the present... 

---