Conical transformation

Sadygov R G and Yarkony D R 1998 On the adiabatic to diabatic states transformation in the presence of a conical intersection a most diabatic basis from the solution to a Poisson s equation. I J. Chem. Rhys. 109 20... 

The H4 system is the prototype for many four-elecbon reactions [34]. The basic tetrahedral sfructure of the conical intersection is preserved in all four-electron systems. It arises from the fact that the four electrons are contributed by four different atoms. Obviously, the tefrahedron is in general not a perfect one. This result was found computationally for many systems (see, e.g., [37]). Robb and co-workers [38] showed that the structure shown (a tetraradicaloid conical intersection) was found for many different photochemical transformations. Having the form of a tetrahedron, the conical intersection can exist in two enantiomeric structures. However, this feature is important only when chiral reactions are discussed. 

The system provides an opportunity to test our method for finding the conical intersection and the stabilized ground-state structures that are formed by the distortion. Recall that we focus on the distinction between spin-paired structures, rather than true minima. A natural choice for anchors are the two C2v stmctures having A2 and B, symmetry shown in Figures 21 and 22 In principle, each set can serve as the anchors. The reaction converting one type-I structirre to another is phase inverting, since it transforms one allyl structure to another (Fig. 12). 

The transformation of ethylene to the carbene requires the re-pairing of three electron pairs. It is a phase-preserving reaction, so that the loop is an ip one. The sp -hybridized carbon atom formed upon H transfer is a chiral center consequently, there are two equivalent loops, and thus conical intersections, leading to two enantiomers. 

In a similar way Table II summarizes how the phase changes upon interconversion among the isomers. Inspection of the two tables shows that for any loop containing three of the possible isomers (open chain and cyclobutene ones), the phase either does not change, or changes twice. Thus, there cannot be a conical intersection inside any of these loops in other words, photochemical transformations between these species only cannot occur via a conical intersection, regardless of the nature of the excited state. 

If A transforms to B by an antara-type process (a Mdbius four electron reaction), the phase would be preserved in the reaction and in the complete loop (An i p loop), and no conical intersection is possible for this case. In that case, the only way to equalize the energies of the ground and excited states, is along a trajectory that increases the separation between atoms in the molecule. Indeed, the two are computed to meet only at infinite interatomic distances, that is, upon dissociation [89]. 

We follow Thompson and Mead [13] to discuss the behavior of the electronic Hamiltonian, potential energy, and derivative coupling between adiabatic states in the vicinity of the D31, conical intersection. Let A be an operator that transforms only the nuclear coordinates, and A be one that acts on the electronic degrees of freedom alone. Clearly, the electronic Hamiltonian satisfies... 

Appendix C On the Single/Multivaluedness of the Adiahatic-to-Diahatic Transformation Matrix Appendix D The Diabatic Representation Appendix E A Numerical Study of a Three-State Model Appendix F The Treatment of a Conical Intersection Removed from the Origin of Coordinates Acknowledgments References... 

Because of difficulties in calculating the non-adiabatic conpling terms, this method did not become very popular. Nevertheless, this approach, was employed extensively in particular to simulate spectroscopic measurements, with a modification introduced by Macias and Riera [47,48]. They suggested looking for a symmetric operator that behaves violently at the vicinity of the conical intersection and use it, instead of the non-adiabatic coupling term, as the integrand to calculate the adiabatic-to-diabatic transformation. Consequently, a series of operators such as the electronic dipole moment operator, the transition dipole moment operator, the quadrupole moment operator, and so on, were employed for this purpose [49,52,53,105]. However, it has to be emphasized that immaterial to the success of this approach, it is still an ad hoc procedure. 

Figure 11. Results for the C2H molecule as calculated along a circle surroiinding the A -2 A conical intersection. Shown are the geometry, the non-adiabalic coupling matrix elements i(p((p J 2) and the adiabatic-to-diabadc transformation angles y((p J2) as calculated for T] (=CC distance) = 1.35 A and for three values (j 2 is the CH distance) (a) and (i>) = 1.80 A (c) and (tf) = 2.00 A (c) and (/) = 3.35 A. (Note that q = r2.)...

Reference [73] presents the first line-integral study between two excited states, namely, between the second and the third states in this series of states. Here, like before, the calculations are done for a fixed value of ri (results are reported for ri = 1.251 A) but in contrast to the previous study the origin of the system of coordinates is located at the point of this particulai conical intersection, that is, the (2,3) conical intersection. Accordingly, the two polar coordinates (adiabatic coupling term i.e. X(p (— C,2 c>(,2/ )) again employing chain rules for the transformation... 

Figure 12, Results for the C2H molecule as calculated along a circle surrounding Che 2 A -3 A conical intersection, The conical intersection is located on the C2v line at a distance of 1,813 A from the CC axis, where ri (=CC distance) 1.2515 A. The center of the circle is located at the point of the conical intersection and defined in terms of a radius < . Shown are the non-adiabatic coupling matrix elements tcp((p ) and the adiabatic-to-diabatic transformation angles y((p i ) as calculated for (ii) and (b) where q = 0.2 A (c) and (d) where q = 0.3 A (e) and (/) where q = 0.4 A. Also shown are the positions of the two close-by (3,4) conical intersections (designated as X34).

Our hypothesis for discussion in this section has been that the conical intersection can be characterized like any other reactive intermediate. On examining Figure 9.3 or 9.10, it is clear that a conical intersection divides the excited-state branch of the reaction path from the ground-state branch in a photochemical transformation. (We shall... 

Neumann boundary conditions, electronic states, adiabatic-to-diabatic transformation, two-state system, 304-309 Newton-Raphson equation, conical intersection location locations, 565 orthogonal coordinates, 567 Non-Abelian theory, molecular systems, Yang-Mills fields nuclear Lagrangean, 250 pure vs. tensorial gauge fields, 250-253 Non-adiabatic coupling ... 

---