Conical intersections systems

We next address the matter of the boundary conditions which the xd(R) must satisfy for such conically intersecting systems. To this effect, we must establish the relation between the diabatic electronic wave functions i i 1,d(r q), n = i, j and the adiabatic ones vj/n, ad(r q0) at the conical intersection. We know from (75) and the reality of A that... 

In conclusion, the conceptual aspects of the geometric phase effect for conically intersecting systems seem now to be well understood. It is important to include this effect not only for bimolecular reactions but also for photodissociation processes occurring in these systems, unless a careful analysis shows it to be nonsignificant. 

Hence, the expression of Eq. (5) indicates that, in a polar coordinate system, Eq. (4) will remain unchanged even if the position of the conical intersection is shifted from the origin of the coordinate system. 

Reactive State-to-State Transition ftobabilides when Calculations are Performed by Shifting the Position of Conical Intersection from the Origin of the Coordinate System... 

The relative shift of the peak position of the rotational distiibution in the presence of a vector potential thus confirms the effect of the geometric phase for the D + H2 system displaying conical intersections. The most important aspect of our calculation is that we can also see this effect by using classical mechanics and, with respect to the quantum mechanical calculation, the computer time is almost negligible in our calculation. This observation is important for heavier systems, where the quantum calculations ai e even more troublesome and where the use of classical mechanics is also more justified. 

The ordinary BO approximate equations failed to predict the proper symmetry allowed transitions in the quasi-JT model whereas the extended BO equation either by including a vector potential in the system Hamiltonian or by multiplying a phase factor onto the basis set can reproduce the so-called exact results obtained by the two-surface diabatic calculation. Thus, the calculated hansition probabilities in the quasi-JT model using the extended BO equations clearly demonshate the GP effect. The multiplication of a phase factor with the adiabatic nuclear wave function is an approximate treatment when the position of the conical intersection does not coincide with the origin of the coordinate axis, as shown by the results of [60]. Moreover, even if the total energy of the system is far below the conical intersection point, transition probabilities in the JT model clearly indicate the importance of the extended BO equation and its necessity. 

In this section, the adiabatic picture will be extended to include the non-adiabatic terais that couple the states. After this has been done, a diabatic picture will be developed that enables the basic topology of the coupled surfaces to be investigated. Of particular interest are the intersection regions, which may form what are called conical intersections. These are a multimode phenomena, that is, they do not occur in ID systems, and the name comes from their shape— in a special 2D space it has the fomi of a double cone. Finally, a model Flamiltonian will be introduced that can describe the coupled surfaces. This enables a global description of the surfaces, and gives both insight and predictive power to the fomration of conical intersections. More detailed review on conical intersections and their properties can be found in [1,14,65,176-178]. 

Conical intersections can be broadly classified in two topological types peaked and sloped [189]. These are sketched in Figure 6. The peaked case is the classical theoretical model from Jahn-Teller and other systems where the minima in the lower surface are either side of the intersection point. As indicated, the dynamics of a system through such an intersection would be expected to move fast from the upper to lower adiabatic surfaces, and not return. In contrast, the sloped form occurs when both states have minima that lie on the same side of the intersection. Here, after crossing from the upper to lower surfaces, recrossing is very likely before relaxation to the ground-state minimum can occur. 

A conical intersection needs at least two nuclear degrees of freedom to form. In a ID system states of different symmetry will cross as Wy = 0 for i j and so when Wu = 0 the surfaces are degenerate. There is, however, no coupling between the states. States of the same symmetry in contrast cannot cross, as both Wij and Wu are nonzero and so the square root in Eq. (68) is always nonzero. This is the basis of the well-known non-crossing rule. 

Other studies have also been made on the dynamics around a conical intersection in a model 2D system, both for dissociahve [225] and bound-state [226] problems. Comparison between surface hopping and exact calculations show reasonable agreement when the coupling between the surfaces is weak, but larger errors are found in the shong coupling limit. 

The first study in which a full CASSCE treatment was used for the non-adiabatic dynamics of a polyatomic system was a study on a model of the retinal chromophore [86]. The cis-trans photoisomerization of retinal is the primary event in vision, but despite much study the mechanism for this process is still unclear. The minimal model for retinal is l-cis-CjH NHj, which had been studied in an earlier quantum chemisti7 study [230]. There, it had been established that a conical intersection exists between the Si and So states with the cis-trans defining torsion angle at approximately a = 80° (cis is at 0°). Two... 

Conical intersections, introduced over 60 years ago as possible efficient funnels connecting different elecbonically excited states [1], are now generally believed to be involved in many photochemical reactions. Direct laboratory observation of these subsurfaces on the potential surfaces of polyatomic molecules is difficult, since they are not stationary points . The system is expected to pass through them veiy rapidly, as the transition from one electronic state to another at the conical intersection is very rapid. Their presence is sunnised from the following data [2-5] ... 

In recent years, computational testimonies for the existence of conical intersections in many polyatomic systems became abundant and compelling [6-11]. The current consensus concerning the ubiquitous presence of conical intersections in polyatomic molecules is due in large part to computational experiments. ... 

The H4 system is the prototype for many four-elecbon reactions [34]. The basic tetrahedral sfructure of the conical intersection is preserved in all four-electron systems. It arises from the fact that the four electrons are contributed by four different atoms. Obviously, the tefrahedron is in general not a perfect one. This result was found computationally for many systems (see, e.g., [37]). Robb and co-workers [38] showed that the structure shown (a tetraradicaloid conical intersection) was found for many different photochemical transformations. Having the form of a tetrahedron, the conical intersection can exist in two enantiomeric structures. However, this feature is important only when chiral reactions are discussed. 

The two coordinates defined for H4 apply also for the H3 system, and the conical intersection in both is the most symmetric structure possible by the combination of the three equivalent structures An equilateral triangle for H3 and a perfect tetrahedron for H4. These sbnctures lie on the ground-state potential surface, at the point connecting it with the excited state. This result is generalized in the Section. IV. 

A chemical reaction takes place on a potential surface that is determined by the solution of the electronic Schrddinger equation. In Section, we defined an anchor by the spin-pairing scheme of the electrons in the system. In the discussion of conical intersections, the only important reactions are those that are accompanied by a change in the spin pairing, that is, interanchor reactions. We limit the following discussion to these class of reactions. 

In this section, the systematic search for conical intersections based on the Longuet-Higgins phase-change rule is described. For conciseness sake, we limit the present discussion to Hiickel-type systems only, unless specifically noted otherwise. The first step in the antilysis is the determination of the LH loops containing a conical intersection for the reaction of interest. 

---