Conformation of bonds

Molecular conformation of bonded ligands and their degree of freedom is dependent on bonding density. The higher the bonding density, the lower the number of possible conformations and thus the less mobility the bonded chains have. Immobilization of ligands on the surface already restrict their mobility, so if we compare the state of free Cl 8 molecules (n-octadecyl) with immobilized octadecyl, we can expect more rigid (or solid-like) behavior of immobilized chain. Indeed, the study of the viscosity of bonded layers [64]... 

This shielding effect and variable conformation of bonded ligands makes the estimate of the amount of accessible residual silanols virtually impossible. 

Fig. 4.4. Fracti

The concept underlying this equivalence is illustrated in Fig. 4.2. Whereas the conformations of bonds (/+1), (i-i-2), etc. are correlated with the conformation of bond /, that of bond (/-i-m ) is essentially independent of... 

The characteristic ratio of the poly(methylene) chain, which might be considered to be the simplest polymer molecule, as a function of chain length is shown in Fig. 4.4 for the simple models considered thus far. All save the simple freely jointed chain display end effects, manifest by an increase in Ci with chain length at small n, which will not be considered further. In what follows, only the asymptotic limit of the characteristic ratio for 00 (Coo) will be discussed. The values of for the freely jointed chain, the freely rotating chain and the chain with independent bond rotational potentials increase in value from 1 through 2 to ca 3-5. The latter value is, however, only ca one-half of the experimentally determined value of Coo=6-9 for poly(methylene). This serious discrepancy points to the fact that the bond rotational potentials are definitely not independent, i.e. the conformation of bond i depends upon the conformations of bonds (/—I) and (/-i-1). 

The second application of the CFTI approach described here involves calculations of the free energy differences between conformers of the linear form of the opioid pentapeptide DPDPE in aqueous solution [9, 10]. DPDPE (Tyr-D-Pen-Gly-Phe-D-Pen, where D-Pen is the D isomer of /3,/3-dimethylcysteine) and other opioids are an interesting class of biologically active peptides which exhibit a strong correlation between conformation and affinity and selectivity for different receptors. The cyclic form of DPDPE contains a disulfide bond constraint, and is a highly specific S opioid [llj. Our simulations provide information on the cost of pre-organizing the linear peptide from its stable solution structure to a cyclic-like precursor for disulfide bond formation. Such... 

A.s mentioned above, most molecules ean adopt more than one conformation, or molecular geometry, simply by rotation around rotatable bonds. Thus, the different conformations of a molecule can be regarded as different spatial arrangements of the atoms, but with an identical constitution and configuration, They are interconvertible and mo.stly they cannot be i.solatcd separately. Figure 2-101 show-s a. super-imposition of a set of conformations of 2R-benzylsuccinatc (cf. Figure 2-89). 

The origin of a torsional barrier can be studied best in simple cases like ethane. Here, rotation about the central carbon-carbon bond results in three staggered and three eclipsed stationary points on the potential energy surface, at least when symmetry considerations are not taken into account. Quantum mechanically, the barrier of rotation is explained by anti-bonding interactions between the hydrogens attached to different carbon atoms. These interactions are small when the conformation of ethane is staggered, and reach a maximum value when the molecule approaches an eclipsed geometry. 

In order to consider the 3D structure but make the chirality code independent of a specific conformer, r- is taken as the sum of the bond lengths between atoms i and j on the path with a minimum number of bond counts. 

Each combination of four atoms (A, B. C. and D) is characterized by two parameters, e and e.. As for the CICC, is a parameter that depends on atomic properties and on distances, and is calculated by Eq. (27), with r, again being the sum of bond lengths between atoms on the path with the minimum number of bond counts. However c is now a geometric parameter (dependent on the conformation)... 

As with methods for allocating electron density to atoms, the Mayer method is not necessarily correct, though it appears to be a useful measure of the bond order that conforms to accepted pictures of bonding in molecules. 

In a systematic search there is a defined endpoint to the procedure, which is reached whe all possible combinations of bond rotations have been considered. In a random search, ther is no natural endpoint one can never be absolutely sure that all of the minimum energ conformations have been found. The usual strategy is to generate conformations until n new structures can be obtained. This usually requires each structure to be generate many times and so the random methods inevitably explore each region of the conformc tional space a large number of times. 

---