Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Configuration interactions classification

Configuration interaction calculations (3, 4) indicate a possible existence of systems belonging to the second group of our classification (triplets). Although these systems have an even number of electrons and no degenerate... [Pg.328]

A description as a MMCT transition is not very obvious for this case. However, there is no essential difference between the physical origin of the colors of Pb(N02)2 and, for example, CU2WO4. Unfortunately the literature shows sometimes discussions on the nature of their excited states in terms of either MMCT or metal-ion-induced CT transitions. To us, such a discussion does not seem to be very fruitful. In the classification it is a matter of taste which nomenclature is used, in the (more difficult) characterization it is essential to determine the coefficients which indicate the amount of configuration interaction. The latter describe the nature of the excited state. [Pg.175]

Fig. 8. Block form of the triplet configuration interaction problem involving 25 singly excited configurations Ag 6 Big 6 B2n 8 B3a 5). The symmetry classification refers to the space part of the triplet functions... Fig. 8. Block form of the triplet configuration interaction problem involving 25 singly excited configurations Ag 6 Big 6 B2n 8 B3a 5). The symmetry classification refers to the space part of the triplet functions...
Tgj is represented exactly and the exact electronic energy, which also includes dispersion effects correctly, is obtained. However, this comes with infinite computational costs. Hence, methods needed to be devised, which allow us to approximate the infinite expansion in Eq. (12.9) by a finite series to be as short as possible. A straightforward approach is the employment of truncated configuration interaction (CI) expansions. Note that (electronic) configuration refers to the set of molecular orbitals used to construct the corresponding Slater determinant. It is a helpful notation for the construction of the truncated series in a systematic manner and yields a classification scheme of Slater determinants with respect to their degree of excitation . Excitation does not mean physical excitation of the molecule but merely substitution of orbitals occupied in the Hartree-Eock determinant o by virtual, unoccupied orbitals. Within the LCAO representation of molecular orbitals the virtual orbitals are obtained automatically with the solution of the Roothaan equations for the occupied orbitals that enter the Hartree-Eock determinant. [Pg.427]

In order to have a more complete picture of the many-body problem for more general or complicated cases that DFT could help to treat, it is necessary to make a correspondence with the use of many-body perturbation theory. Under this wider classification of perturbation theory are included all the methods that treat electron correlation beyond the Hartree-Fock level, including configuration interaction, coupled cluster, etc. This perturbational approach has traditionally been known as second quantization, and its power for some applications can be seen when dealing with problems beyond the standard quantum mechanics. [Pg.387]

I/O =4, I/q = 2, etc.) of atom A can be. split into two parts AI/ and AK (equations 9a and 9b). The first term AV/ of equation (8) is a charge term resulting from RHF. It can be either positive or negative, while the second term A from configuration interaction must be negative due to the opening of the shells. This will always yield a reduced valence. For classification of the molecule as a diradical or zwitterion, the AV and AV are calculated according to equations (lOa) and (10b), where the sum runs over all atoms of the molecule. [Pg.509]

It has been shown earlier (see Chapters 15 and 16) that the technique relying on the tensorial properties of operators and wave functions in quasispin, orbital and spin spaces is an alternative but more convenient one than the method of higher-rank groups. It is more convenient not only for classification of states, but also for theoretical studies of interactions in equivalent electron configurations. The results of this chapter show that the above is true of more complex configurations as well. [Pg.199]

Chemisorption and Physisorption. One classification of adsorption phenomena is based on the adsorption energy the energy of the adsorbate-surface interaction. In this classification there are two basic types of adsorption chemisorption (an abbreviation of chemical adsorption) and physisorption (an abbreviation of physical adsorption). In chemisorption the chemical attractive forces of adsorption are acting between surface and adsorbate (usually covalent bonds). Thus, there is a chemical combination between the substrate and the adsorbate where electrons are shared and/or transferred. New electronic configurations are formed by this sharing of electrons. In physisorption the physical forces of adsorption, van der Waals or pure electrostatic forces, operate between the surface and the adsorbate there is no electron transfer and no electron sharing. [Pg.167]

Fig. 28. Classification of crossbridge configurations in myosin filaments in different muscles. In each case, the axial separation is 143-145 A and the lateral separation is 120-150 A. There are three main classes (A) Class I, where the interaction is between heads of the same molecule as in vertebrate striated muscles (B) Class II, where interaction occurs between heads of adjacent myosin molecules in the same crown, as seen in insect (Lethocerus) flight muscles and (C) Glass III, where the interaction appears to be between heads in different crowns, as seen in tarantula and Limulus. Fig. 28. Classification of crossbridge configurations in myosin filaments in different muscles. In each case, the axial separation is 143-145 A and the lateral separation is 120-150 A. There are three main classes (A) Class I, where the interaction is between heads of the same molecule as in vertebrate striated muscles (B) Class II, where interaction occurs between heads of adjacent myosin molecules in the same crown, as seen in insect (Lethocerus) flight muscles and (C) Glass III, where the interaction appears to be between heads in different crowns, as seen in tarantula and Limulus.
In contrast to NO, few complexes of the phosphorus monoxide (PO) ligand have been reported.30 On the basis of what you know about NO as a ligand and on the relevant electron configurations, discuss possible ways in which PO might be likely to interact with transition metals. Be sure to include in your discussion the specific classification(s) of ligand-metal interactions most likely to occur. [Pg.100]

The comparison with results of high level quantum-chemical calculations proves the utility of the simple discrete models of molecular interaction for predicting the most stable topologies of water cycles and PWCs. Based on these discrete models an effective enumerating techniques was developed for hierarchical classification of proton configurations. In spite of the fact that PWCs are very complex systems with complicated interactions, the discrete models of inter-molecular interaction help us to see the wood for the trees (Fig. 3). [Pg.311]


See other pages where Configuration interactions classification is mentioned: [Pg.314]    [Pg.314]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.950]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.360]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.371]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.569]    [Pg.814]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.359]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.108 ]




SEARCH



Configuration Interaction

Configurational interaction

© 2024 chempedia.info