Schrodinger equation configuration interaction

The K-matrix method is essentially a configuration interaction (Cl) performed at a fixed energy lying in the continuum upon a basis of "unperturbed funetions that (at the formal level) includes both diserete and eontinuous subsets. It turns the Schrodinger equation into a system of integral equations for the K-matrix elements, which is then transformed into a linear system by a quadrature upon afinite L basis set. 

The difference between the Hartree-Fock energy and the exact solution of the Schrodinger equation (Figure 60), the so-called correlation energy, can be calculated approximately within the Hartree-Fock theory by the configuration interaction method (Cl) or by a perturbation theoretical approach (Mpller-Plesset perturbation calculation wth order, MPn). Within a Cl calculation the wave function is composed of a linear combination of different Slater determinants. Excited-state Slater determinants are then generated by exciting electrons from the filled SCF orbitals to the virtual ones ... 

A rigourous way to evaluate the total interaction potential energy, U(q(N- ), would be the formulation and resolution of the Schrodinger equation for the whole system at each configuration. However, given the size of the samples where the statistical simulations are performed, this method is impracticable. 

This chapter reviews models based on quantum mechanics starting from the Schrodinger equation. Hartree-Fock models are addressed first, followed by models which account for electron correlation, with focus on density functional models, configuration interaction models and Moller-Plesset models. All-electron basis sets and pseudopotentials for use with Hartree-Fock and correlated models are described. Semi-empirical models are introduced next, followed by a discussion of models for solvation. 

Configuration Interaction Calculations. For the ground state of a molecule, the optimal coefficients for the MC wave function in Eq. 5 are those that cause F to satisfy the Schrodinger equation with the lowest energy. Other sets of coefficients that cause F to satisfy Eq. 1 give the wave functions for excited states of the molecule. 

Having discussed ways to reduce the scope of the MCSCF problem, it is appropriate to consider the other limiting case. What if we carry out a CASSCF calculation for all electrons including all orbitals in the complete active space Such a calculation is called full configuration interaction or full CF. Witliin the choice of basis set, it is the best possible calculation that can be done, because it considers the contribution of every possible CSF. Thus, a full CI with an infinite basis set is an exact solution of the (non-relativistic, Bom-Oppenheimer, time-independent) Schrodinger equation. 

There are essentially two different quantum mechanical approaches to approximately solve the Schrodinger equation. One approach is perturbation theory, which will be described in a different set of lectures, and the other is the variational method. The configuration interaction equations are derived using the variational method. Here, one starts out by writing the energy as a functional F of the approximate wavefunction ip>... 

A common and important problem in theoretical chemistry and in condensed matter physics is the calculation of the rate of transitions, for example chemical reactions or diffusion events. In either case, the configuration of atoms is changed in some way during the transition. The interaction between the atoms can be obtained from an (approximate) solution of the Schrodinger equation describing the electrons, or from an otherwise determined potential energy function. Most often, it is sufficient to treat the motion of the atoms using classical mechanics,... 

Based on first principles. Used for rigorous quantum chemistry, i. e., for MO calculations based on Slater determinants. Generally, the Schrodinger equation (Hy/ = Ey/) is solved in the BO approximation (see Born-Oppenheimer approximation) with a large but finite basis set of atomic orbitals (for example, STO-3G, Hartree-Fock with configuration interaction). 

The only model available for direct quantum-mechanical study of interatomic interaction is the hydrogen molecular ion Hj. If the two protons are considered clamped in position at a fixed distance apart, the single electron is represented by a Schrodinger equation, which can be separated in confo-cal elliptic coordinates. On varying the interproton distance for a series of calculations a complete mapping of the interaction for all possible configurations is presumably achieved. This is not the case. Despite its reasonable appearance the model is by no means unbiased. 

In configuration interaction (Cl), one mixes states arising from different spin-orbital configurations. In theory, one may expand the exact solution to Schrodinger s electronic equation (equation 5) in terms of the complete (infinite) set of determi-nantal wavefunctions, which in turn are constructed from some complete set of one-electron spin orbitals.33 This is obviously not a practical solution, and one must find instead, a smaller number of determinantal functions formed from the complete set which will give a close approximation to the true solution. 

Beyond the Molecular Orbital Approach Introduction.—In principle an exact solution to the non-relativistic Schrodinger equations for a molecule can be achieved by the configuration interaction technique. A complete set of one-electron spin orbitals i is used to form a complete set of Slater determinants by choosing all possible ordered sets of n elements of the set of 4u s. A linear combination of these determinants is then used ... 

In table 2 our result is compared with the UV spectroscopic result of Klein et al. [26], Also shown are the theoretical results of Zhang et al. [2], Plante et al. [27], and Chen et al. [28], The first of these uses perturbation theory, with matrix elements of effective operators derived from the Bethe-Salpeter equation, evaluated with high precision solutions of the non-relativistic Schrodinger equation. This yields a power series in a and In a. The calculations of Zhang et al. include terms up to O(o5 hi a) but omit terms of 0(ary) a.u. The calculations of Plante et al. use an all orders relativistic perturbation theory method, while those of Chen et al. use relativistic configuration interaction theory. These both obtain all structure terms, up to (Za)4 a.u., and use explicit QED corrections from Drake [29],... 

Two general groups of methodologies are used to solve the Schrodinger equation in combination with cluster models, the Hartree-Fock (HF) approach and related methods to include correlation effects like Mpller-Plesset perturbation theory (MP2) or configuration interaction (Cl) [58,59] and the Density Functional Theory (DFT) approach [59,60]. 

---