Concentration laws

The added scavengers compete with the secondary recombination between CeHgO and e aq according to the square root of concentration law. 

As could have been expected from other studies dealing with the oxidation of phenolic compounds (e.g., oxidation with 02 see Chapter 2, this volume), the monophenolate species (HQ-) of a given hydroquinone is a by far more reactive reductant as compared to the nondissociated hydroquinone (H2Q). This is illustrated by Figure 8, which shows the pH dependence of the rate of transformation of 4-chloro-nitrobenzene (4-C1) in 5 mM H2S at a fixed total lawson concentration [[LAW]T = 250 piM, pKTal (H2LAW) = 8.68]. 

Ab initio calculations for nondilute systems become very complicated. Einstein derived the linear term in the concentration law for the viscosity in 1906 and 1911. The quadratic term, which is the first interaction term, was published in 1977 by Batchelcn ... 

In principle, some types of nonspherical particles could be packed more tightly than spheres, although they would start to interact at lower concentrations. In reality, higher viscosities are normally found with nonspherical particles. The concentration law is approximately exponential at low to moderate concentrations, but equations similar to eq. 10.5.1 can still be used as well. The empirical value of 4>m can be much smaller than that for spherical particles (e.g., 0.44 for rough crystals with aspect ratios close to unity Kitano et al., 1981). If fibers are used, this value drops even further, down to 0.18 for an aspect ratio of 27 (see also Metzner, 1985). The decrease with aspect ratio seems to be roughly linear. Homogeneous suspensions of fibers with large aspect ratios are difficult to prepare and handle. As in dilute systems, the type of flow will determine the extent of the shape effect. Extensional flows are discussed below. 

Effect of electrostatic repulsion on the coefficient of the term in the viscosity-concentration law. After Russel (1980). 

Relation between the power law indices of the concentration laws for modulus and yield stress comparison between experiment (rectangles) (van der Aerschot, 1989) and theory (lines). From Patel and Russel (1988). 

Yielding is more difficult to measure and to model. For strongly flocculated systems, Buscall et al. (1987) measured the yield stress under compression and found a concentration law quite similar to that for the shear modulus. This relation differed, however, from that for the yield stress in shear. Patel and Russel (1988) predicted nearly identical power law indices for modulus and shear yield stress. This prediction has been confirmed experimentally (Figure 10.7.2), albeit for reversibly flocculated systems. The theory is based on the classical yielding criteria. Reversible systems do not follow these criteria as yielding becomes a kinetic phenomenon. The yield stress then depends on shear history (Mewis and Meire, 1984). 

The equations which govern the different concentrations, laws of mass action, electroneutrahty, balance equations, are very similar whether they be dopants or defects, leading to similar calculations. Let us consider once again the earher example of SrTi03, the concentration of electrons at 400 K after quenching at 1,000 K is 8.7.101 /cm instead of S.SO.lO /cm, value calculated at equihbrium. 

Relationships between the intensity of incident light, sample thickness, concentration and intensity of transmitted light are embodied in Beer s law and Lambert s law. ... 

Beer s law This states that the proportion of light absorbed depends on the thickness d) of the absorbing layer, and on the molecular concentration (c) of the absorbing substance in the layer. It is an extension of Lambert s law, and may be written in the form... 

Fick s law of diffusion A law relating the rate of diffusion of a substance in a given direction to the gradient of its concentration. 

For dilute solutions, solute-solute interactions are unimportant (i.e., Henry s law will hold), and the variation of surface tension with concentration will be linear (at least for nonelectrolytes). Thus... 

Once nuclei form in a supersaturated solution, they begin to grow by accretion and, as a result, the concentration of the remaining material drops. There is thus a competition for material between the processes of nucleation and of crystal growth. The more rapid the nucleation, the larger the number of nuclei formed before relief of the supersaturation occurs and the smaller the final crystal size. This, qualitatively, is the basis of what is known as von Weimam s law [86] ... 

The polymer concentration profile has been measured by small-angle neutron scattering from polymers adsorbed onto colloidal particles [70,71] or porous media [72] and from flat surfaces with neutron reflectivity [73] and optical reflectometry [74]. The fraction of segments bound to the solid surface is nicely revealed in NMR studies [75], infrared spectroscopy [76], and electron spin resonance [77]. An example of the concentration profile obtained by inverting neutron scattering measurements appears in Fig. XI-7, showing a typical surface volume fraction of 0.25 and layer thickness of 10-15 nm. The profile decays rapidly and monotonically but does not exhibit power-law scaling [70]. 

The Langmuir-Hinshelwood picture is essentially that of Fig. XVIII-14. If the process is unimolecular, the species meanders around on the surface until it receives the activation energy to go over to product(s), which then desorb. If the process is bimolecular, two species diffuse around until a reactive encounter occurs. The reaction will be diffusion controlled if it occurs on every encounter (see Ref. 211) the theory of surface diffusional encounters has been treated (see Ref. 212) the subject may also be approached by means of Monte Carlo/molecular dynamics techniques [213]. In the case of activated bimolecular reactions, however, there will in general be many encounters before the reactive one, and the rate law for the surface reaction is generally written by analogy to the mass action law for solutions. That is, for a bimolecular process, the rate is taken to be proportional to the product of the two surface concentrations. It is interesting, however, that essentially the same rate law is obtained if the adsorption is strictly localized and species react only if they happen to adsorb on adjacent sites (note Ref. 214). (The apparent rate law, that is, the rate law in terms of gas pressures, depends on the form of the adsorption isotherm, as discussed in the next section.)... 

The course of a surface reaction can in principle be followed directly with the use of various surface spectroscopic techniques plus equipment allowing the rapid transfer of the surface from reaction to high-vacuum conditions see Campbell [232]. More often, however, the experimental observables are the changes with time of the concentrations of reactants and products in the gas phase. The rate law in terms of surface concentrations might be called the true rate law and the one analogous to that for a homogeneous system. What is observed, however, is an apparent rate law giving the dependence of the rate on the various gas pressures. The true and the apparent rate laws can be related if one assumes that adsorption equilibrium is rapid compared to the surface reaction. 

It was pointed out that a bimolecular reaction can be accelerated by a catalyst just from a concentration effect. As an illustrative calculation, assume that A and B react in the gas phase with 1 1 stoichiometry and according to a bimolecular rate law, with the second-order rate constant k equal to 10 1 mol" see" at 0°C. Now, assuming that an equimolar mixture of the gases is condensed to a liquid film on a catalyst surface and the rate constant in the condensed liquid solution is taken to be the same as for the gas phase reaction, calculate the ratio of half times for reaction in the gas phase and on the catalyst surface at 0°C. Assume further that the density of the liquid phase is 1000 times that of the gas phase. 

Using the Gibbs-Diihem equation ((A2.1.27) with dT = 0, dp = 0), one can show that the solvent must obey Raoult s law over the same concentration range where Hemy s law is valid for the solute (or solutes) ... 

The theory of strong electrolytes due to Debye and Htickel derives the exact limiting laws for low valence electrolytes and introduces the idea that the Coulomb interactions between ions are screened at finite ion concentrations. 

Wlien KC) < i (i.e. at very low concentrations), we have the Debye-Htickel limiting law distribution fiinction ... 

Going beyond die limiting law it is found that the modified (or renonnalized) virial coefficients in Mayer s theory of electrolytes are fiinctions of the concentration through their dependence on k. The ionic second virial coefficient is given by [62]... 

In both cases the late stages of kinetics show power law domain growth, the nature of which does not depend on the mitial state it depends on the nature of the fluctuating variable(s) which is (are) driving the phase separation process. Such a fluctuating variable is called the order parameter for a binary mixture, tlie order parameter o(r,0 is tlie relative concentration of one of the two species and its fluctuation around the mean value is 5e(/,t) = c(r,t) - c. In the disordered phase, the system s concentration is homogeneous and the order... 

---