Computer implementation of coupled cluster

This becomes more complicated once the algorithm is parallelized to utilize modem computer architectures. Again one may therefore consider to utilize existing implementations of coupled cluster techniques to benefit from the work done in this area. The first step would be to derive a restricted algorithm that can be compared to non-relativistic closed shell algorithms. 

A superior method for the calculation of excited-state PE surfaces is CC2, which is a simplified and computationally efficient variant of coupled-cluster theory with single and double excitations [22], CC2 can be considered as the equivalent of MP2 for excited electronic states. Efficient implementations of CC2 with density fitting [23] and analytic gradients [24] allow reaction path calculations for rather large systems. Being a singlereference method, CC2 fails in the vicinity of conical intersections of excited states with the electronic ground state. 

In Volume 5 of this series, R. J. Bartlett and J. E Stanton authored a popular tutorial on applications of post-Hartree-Fock methods. Here in Chapter 2, Dr. T. Daniel Crawford and Professor Henry F. Schaefer III explore coupled cluster theory in great depth. Despite the depth, the treatment is brilliantly clear. Beginning with fundamental concepts of cluster expansion of the wavefunction, the authors provide the formal theory and the derivation of the coupled cluster equations. This is followed by thorough explanations of diagrammatic representations, the connection to many-bodied perturbation theory, and computer implementation of the method. Directions for future developments are laid out. 

The purpose of this work is to extend Sekino and Bartlett s approach - which we will refer to as a linearized EOM coupled cluster (EOM-CCl) method - to computations of the frequency-dependent optical rotations of chiral molecules. The development of coupled cluster methods in this field has been dedicated to the implementation of streamlined models of chiroptical properties that are applicable to large molecules[27,28], and this work represents apossible step toward that goal. We will compare the performance of the EOM-CCl approach to its linear-response counterpart - both in terms of theoretical predictions and computational efficiency - for the rigid chiral molecules (5 )-methyloxirane, (5)-2-chloropropionitrile, and (1S,4S)-norbornenone, as well as the conformationally flexible species (/ )-epichlorohydrin. 

A second purpose of the present work is to assess the performance of the explicitly correlated coupled-cluster model CCSD(F12) that we have recently implemented in the TuR-BOMOLE program package [68, 69]. This model has the potential to yield electronic molecular energies at the level of coupled-cluster theory with single and double excitations (CCSD [37, 70]) at the limit of a complete one-particle basis set. In conjunction with corrections for higher excitations (connected triples and connected quadruples) it should be possible to compute the barrier height for the above reaction with an accuracy of about 1-2 kJ mol that is, with an error of about 0.5-1.0%. 

Piecuch, P., Kucharski, S. A., Kowalski, K., 8c Musiat, M. (2002). Efficient computer implementation of the renormalized coupled-cluster methods The R-CCSD[T], R-CCSD(T), CR-CCSD T, and CR-CCSD(T) approaches. Computer Physics Communications, 149, 7196. 

If we except the Density Functional Theory and Coupled Clusters treatments (see, for example, reference [1] and references therein), the Configuration Interaction (Cl) and the Many-Body-Perturbation-Theory (MBPT) [2] approaches are the most widely-used methods to deal with the correlation problem in computational chemistry. The MBPT approach based on an HF-SCF (Hartree-Fock Self-Consistent Field) single reference taking RHF (Restricted Hartree-Fock) [3] or UHF (Unrestricted Hartree-Fock ) orbitals [4-6] has been particularly developed, at various order of perturbation n, leading to the widespread MPw or UMPw treatments when a Moller-Plesset (MP) partition of the electronic Hamiltonian is considered [7]. The implementation of such methods in various codes and the large distribution of some of them as black boxes make the MPn theories a common way for the non-specialist to tentatively include, with more or less relevancy, correlation effects in the calculations. 

The computational problem, then, is determination of the cluster amplitudes t for aU of the operators included in tlie particular approximation. In the standard implementation, this task follows the usual procedure of left-multiplying the Schrodinger equation by trial wave functions expressed as dctcnninants of the HF orbitals. This generates a set of coupled, nonlinear equations in the amplitudes which must be solved, usually by some iterative technique. With the amplitudes in hand, the coupled-cluster energy is computed as... 

The accurate calculation of these molecular properties requires the use of ab initio methods, which have increased enormously in accuracy and efficiency in the last three decades. Ab initio methods have developed in two directions first, the level of approximation has become increasingly sophisticated and, hence, accurate. The earliest ab initio calculations used the Hartree-Fock/self-consistent field (HF/SCF) methodology, which is the simplest to implement. Subsequently, such methods as Mpller-Plesset perturbation theory, multi-configuration self-consistent field theory (MCSCF) and coupled-cluster (CC) theory have been developed and implemented. Relatively recently, density functional theory (DFT) has become the method of choice since it yields an accuracy much greater than that of HF/SCF while requiring relatively little additional computational effort. 

For molecules that require a multireference description, use of a single reference post-HF method can often fail since the dynamic correlation space is insufficient. Multireference post-HF methods are quite taxing in terms of computational resources and comprise a very active area of theoretical development." A method that has shown some recent promise is multireference coupled cluster (MRCC) theory, and the implementation proposed by Mukheijee and coworkers" (often labeled as MkCC or MkMRCC) has garnered much interest." ... 

Impressive work implementing and applying various coupled-cluster codes on parallel computer architectures was reported by Rendell and coworkers, Rendell, Lee, and Lindh presented a formulation of the singles... 

Using the truncated Hausdorff expansion, we may obtain analytic expressions for the commutators in Eq. [52] and insert these into the coupled cluster energy and amplitude equations (Eqs. [50] and [51], respectively). However, this is only the first step in obtaining expressions that may be efficiently implemented on the computer. We must next choose a truncation of T and then derive expressions containing only one- and two-electron integrals and cluster amplitudes. This is a formidable task to which we will return in later sections. 

---