Selenium complex hydrides

Since the hydride technique only permits quantitative detection of selenium which is present ionogenically in solution, decomposition is required for organically or complex-bonded selenium. Organically loaded water samples must also be decomposed before measurement. Two methods of decomposition are described below. 

According to this model the iron-hydride bond is cleaved upon illumination and the hydride, together with the proton, leaves the complex. This would lead to re-establishment of the nickel thiolate bond which was weakened in the former state, explaining the changes in the EPR spectrum observed after illumination (Pig. 7.16-III). After a flip of the electronic z-axis the selenium could in this state interact with the unpaired electron in an orbital with d -y2 character. To get EPR-active, CO-treated... 

The EPA has approved special methods for arsenic (EPA Method 7061) and selenium (EPA Method 7741) analysis by gaseous hydride generation technique, which offer a unique combination of selectivity and sensitivity. This technique has an advantage of being able to isolate these elements from complex matrices that may cause interferences in analysis with other techniques. 

A combination of IPC and inductively coupled plasma (ICP) MS was extensively explored for the speciation of phosphorus, arsenic, selenium, cadmium, mercury, and chromium compounds [108-118] because it provides specific and sensitive element detection. Selenium IPC speciation was joined to atomic fluorescent spectrometry via an interface in which all selenium species were reduced by thiourea before conventional hydride generation [119], Coupling IPC separation of monomethyl and mercuric Hg in biotic samples by formation of their thiourea complexes with cold vapor generation and atomic fluorescence detection was successfully validated [120]. The coupling of IPC with atomic absorption spectrometry was also used for online speciation of Cr(III) and Cr(VI) [121] and arsenic compounds employing hydride generation [122]. 

With this information in hand, it seemed reasonable to attempt to use force field methods to model the transition states of more complex, chiral systems. To that end, transition state.s for the delivery of hydrogen atom from stannanes 69 71 derived from cholic acid to the 2.2,.3-trimethy 1-3-pentyl radical 72 (which was chosen as the prototypical prochiral alkyl radical) were modeled in a similar manner to that published for intramolecular free-radical addition reactions (Beckwith-Schicsscr model) and that for intramolecular homolytic substitution at selenium [32]. The array of reacting centers in each transition state 73 75 was fixed at the geometry of the transition state determined by ah initio (MP2/DZP) molecular orbital calculations for the attack of methyl radical at trimethyltin hydride (viz. rsn-n = 1 Si A rc-H = i -69 A 6 sn-H-C = 180°) [33]. The remainder of each structure 73-75 was optimized using molecular mechanics (MM2) in the usual way. In all, three transition state conformations were considered for each mode of attack (re or ) in structures 73-75 (Scheme 14). In general, the force field method described overestimates experimentally determined enantioseleclivities (Scheme 15), and the development of a flexible model is now being considered [33]. 

---