Complementarity of charges

Once the protein interaction pattern is translated from Cartesian coordinates into distances from the reactive center of the enzyme and the structure of the ligand has been described with similar fingerprints, both sets of descriptors can be compared [25]. The hydrophobic complementarity, the complementarity of charges and H-bonds for the protein and the substrates are all computed using Carbo similarity indices [26]. The prediction of the site of metabolism (either in CYP or in UGT) is based on the hypothesis that the distance between the reactive center on the protein (iron atom in the heme group or the phosphorous atom in UDP) and the interaction points in the protein cavity (GRID-MIF) should correlate to the distance between the reactive center of the molecule (i.e. positions of hydrogen atoms and heteroatoms) and the position of the different atom types in the molecule [27]. 

A proposal has been put forward that electrostatic forces can play a role in complexes of a number of purines and pyrimidines (entries 50-69, Table II) with riboflavin. The interaction is suggested to be favored by the complementarity of charge (obtained as charge densities in Huckel calculations) in the regions C-6 to N-9 in the purines and N-1 to N-10 of the flavin (Fig. 24). These fractional charges are manifestations of the slight polarity of... 

It is Lewis complementarity, on the other hand, that is operative when the mating of the molecules is determined by acid-base interactions, one that is described and predicted by the complementary mating of the lumps with the holes in the two associated Laplacian distributions. A molecule s reactive surface is defined by the zero envelope of the Laplacian distribution, the envelope that separates the shells of charge concentration from those of charge depletion. The reactive surfaces make immediately clear the locations of the lumps, the nucleophilic sites, and the holes, the electrophilic sites, that are brought into juxtaposi-... 

The data in the Figs. 9.1,9.2 and 9.4 nicely illustrate the complementarity of XPS and SIMS and the possibilities that thin film oxide supports offer for surface investigations. Owing to the conducting properties of the support, charging is virtually absent and typical single crystal techniques such as monochromatic XPS and static SIMS can be applied to their full potential to answer questions on the preparation of supported catalysts. 

Figure 11.2. Globular conformations of an A-type duplex (left) and a B-type duplex (right), generally seen for RNA RNA and DNA DNA duplexes, respectively. Charge and shape complementarity of neomycin to the A-form major groove Computer models of (left) neomycin docked in the major groove of A-form DNA, and (right) neomycin buried in the B-form major groove. See color plates.

In order to develop selective electrodes, it is necessary to introduce specific interactions between the ionophore and the anion of interest. This can be achieved by designing an ion carrier whose structure is complementary to the anion. This type of design can be based on molecular recognition principles, such as the ones that involve complementarity of shape and charge distribution between the ion and the ionophore. 

Complementarity may involve the size and shape of guest molecules, the distribution of charged chemical groups on their surfaces, the ability to hydrogen bond through appropriately positioned donor or acceptor groups, the disposition of hydrophobic or hydrophilic chemical groups, or a combination of these. 

In most interactions between two reactants, local shape complementarity of functional groups is of importance. A local shape complementarity of molecular electron densities represented by FIDCOs implies complementary curvatures for complementary values of the charge density threshold parameters a. For various curvature domains of a FIDCO, we shall use the notations originally proposed for complete molecues [2], For example, the symbol D2(b),i(a, Fj) stands for the i-th locally convex domain of a FIDCO G(a) of functional group Fj, where local convexity, denoted by subscript 2(b), is interpreted relative to a reference curvature b. For locally saddle type and locally concave domains relative to curvature b, the analogous subscripts 1(b) and 0(b) are used, respectively. 

Shape complementarity of molecular electron densities represented by MIDCO s involves complementary curvatures, as well as complementary values of the charge density contour parameters a. In general, a locally convex domain relative to a reference curvature b shows shape complementarity with a locally concave domain relative to a reference curvature -b. Furthermore, shape complementarity between the lower electron density contours of one molecule and the higher electron density contours of the other molecule is of importance. 

These hydrides illustrate the complementarity of 7s(r) and Vs(r) in the context of molecular reactivity. Within a horizontal row, the electrostatic aspect is not determining the variation in VS min is small and not consistent with the trends in AHw and p/fa. However, these can be explained nicely in terms of 7S min, the charge transfer/sharing aspect. Within a vertical column, on the other hand, the situation is exactly reversed, and electrostatics are dominant. 

---