Comparability testing clinical considerations

Product bioavailability is mentioned, especially where it is low. Where there are differences between the formulations tested for bioavailability during the development process and the formulation to be marketed, there is considerable discussion of the data provided on the bioequivalence of the different products and/or formulations. This is particularly so where, for example, early clinical studies were undertaken with capsules but the marketed dosage form is to be a tablet. Bioequivalence data and pharmacokinetic data (e.g., in crossover studies) and comparative dissolution studies are usually reported. This is particularly significant where the different strengths of the final products are not achieved by using different quantities of the same granulate formulation. Process optimization may also be addressed in such cases. 

The premarket notification application, 510(k), is reviewed by the FDA scientific staff. This evaluation takes into consideration tumor-associated analytes, test requirements, medical usefulness of the test system for a particular clinical claim, and its application (i.e., monitoring or treatment follow-up). The FDA determines the appropriate performance requirements for each tumor analyte category. The agency s staff considers factors, such as consequences of a false positive or false negative, and the importance or impact of an absolute versus a significant change in the results or values of the tumor marker tests. The performance criteria (parameters) of a particular tumor marker test are compared with those of previously... 

Clinical trial supplies can be blinded using several techniques depending on the availability of resources and the consideration of competitor companies. The ideal situation is to produce a placebo or comparator product that looks and behaves in an identical fashion to its active test counterpart, for example, the same colour, weight, shape, size, markings, texture and... 

---