Hydrogen bonding cohesive energy

Hansen [137-139], and later van Krevelen [114] proposed the generalization of the solubility parameter concept to attempt to include the effects of strong dipole interactions and hydrogen bonding interactions. It was proposed that the cohesive energy density be written as the sum of three terms, viz. 

Liquids without dipole moments (alkanes) have quite low cohesive energy densities, whereas hquids with dipole moments or hydrogen-bonding groups have high cohesive energy densities. 

To illustrate the application of the imf and steric parameters we consider cohesive energies of MeX at 298.15 K taken from the compilation of Majer and Svoboda73. The data set (Table 9) contains no compounds capable of hydrogen bonding. We have therefore used the IMF equation in the form ... 

The second important solvent effect on Lewis acid-Lewis base equilibria concerns the interactions with the Lewis base. Since water is also a good electron-pair acceptor129, Lewis-type interactions are competitive. This often seriously hampers the efficiency of Lewis acid catalysis in water. Thirdly, the intermolecular association of a solvent affects the Lewis acid-base equilibrium242. Upon complexation, one or more solvent molecules that were initially coordinated to the Lewis acid or the Lewis base are liberated into the bulk liquid phase, which is an entropically favourable process. This effect is more pronounced in aprotic than in protic solvents which usually have higher cohesive energy densities. The unfavourable entropy changes in protic solvents are somewhat counterbalanced by the formation of new hydrogen bonds in the bulk liquid. 

While the solubility parameter can be used to conduct solubility studies, it is more informative, in dealing with charged polymers such as SPSF, to employ the three dimensional solubility parameter (A7,A8). The solubility parameter of a liquid is related to the total cohesive energy (E) by the equation 6 = (E/V) 2, where V is the molar volume. The total cohesive energy can be broken down into three additive components E = E j + Ep + Ejj, where the three components represent the contributions to E due to dispersion or London forces, permanent dipole-dipole or polar forces, and hydrogen bonding forces, respectively. This relationship is used... 

In the present context, the solvation of a solvent molecule in its own liquid (i.e., condensation from the vapor, the opposite of evaporation) is of interest (Ben-Naim and Marcus, 1984). The solvation properties of solvents (solvent effects) depend mainly on their polarity/polarizability (accounting also for dispersion interactions), hydrogen-bond donation and acceptance abilities, and cohesive energy density (Marcus, 1993). 

Whereas the polarity effect is ascribed to the dielectric constant, the hydrophobic effect is a consequence of the high cohesive energy density (c.e.d.) of water, resulting from a unique hydrogen-bonding network (Lubineau et al., 1994). Given table 6.5, which compares the cohesive energy density and the dielectric constant of selection of common solvents at 25°C, there is no correlation between the structuralization and the polarity of the solvents. 

---