Clozapine symptoms

Neuroleptics or antipsychotics suppress the positive symptoms of schizophrenia such as combativeness, hallucinations and formal thought disorder. Some also alleviate the negative symptoms such as affective blunting, withdrawal and seclusiveness. Neuroleptics also produce a state of apathy and emotional indifference. Most neuroleptics block dopamine D2-receptors but some, like clozapine, also block dopamine D4-receptors or serotonin 5-hydroxytryptamine2A-receptors. 

Note that only a 1-week supply of clozapine is dispensed at a time. The drug is obtained through a special program designed to ensure the required blood monitoring. Weekly WBC laboratory tests are required. Immediately report any signs of weakness, fever, sore throat, malaise, or flu-like symptoms to the primary care provider. 

Reference has been made already to the shortcomings of the term neuroleptic . We now have a situation in which the drugs that are most useful in schizophrenia are regarded as atypical. While the term was introduced to cover those neuroleptics that do not cause EPSs, it has become synonymous with clozapine which has additional advantages over other neuroleptics (e.g. reduces negative symptoms, see text). Thus it is not always clear what is meant or covered by atypical. Hopefully this distinction between the neuroleptics will become unnecessary as better compounds are developed and the older ones become obsolete. 

Many of the neuroleptics are a-adrenoceptor antagonists. Some, like chlorpromazine, block d postsynaptic receptors while clozapine (and risperidone) are as potent at 2 as D2 receptors. There is no evidence that either of these actions could influence striatal or mesolimbic function but NA is considered important for function of the prefrontal cortex and any increase in its release, achieved by blocking a2-mediated autoinhibition, might contribute to a reduction in negative symptoms and provide a further plus for clozapine (see Nutt et al. 1997). Centrally, however, most a2-receptors are found postsynaptically and their function, and the effect of blocking them, is uncertain. 

Despite these problems it remains necessary to attempt some explanation in terms of differential NT antagonism, of why clozapine is so effective (see Reynolds 1997) in that it causes fewer EPSs, reduces negative symptoms and is effective in some patients refractory to other drugs. Considering these benefits in turn ... 

Negative symptoms. These may be reduced because either clozapine antagonises appropriate receptors in the prefrontal cortex or it does not act as an antagonist there. This apparently stupid statement is prompted by the lack of knowledge of what is required to reduce negative symptoms. D4 and Di receptors are found in the prefrontal cortex and only clozapine among current neuroleptics is more active at both of these than the D2 receptor. Thus on this basis it is well placed to block DA s... 

Refractory cases respond to clozapine. If D2 antagonism is considered necessary, or at least desirable, for counteracting positive symptoms it is surprising that a relatively weak D2 antagonist like clozapine should not only be so effective but also prove successful in patients who have not responded to other neuroleptics more potent at D2 receptors. 

Certainly clozapine can avoid EPSs by only blocking a fraction of D2 receptors but that seems insufficient on its own to make clozapine so effective in schizophrenia. That is probably achieved by a unique combination of other blocking actions, at Di, D4, 5-HT2, o 2 and possibly other receptors (see Fig. 17.8). It may simply be that clozapine is so effective because it is so dirty , a view held for many years about the first neuroleptic chlorpromazine. Indeed it is unlikely that the varied symptoms of such a complicated disorder could be rectified by manipulating just one NT. 

Figure 17.9 Schematic representation of the proposed activity profile of an ideal neuroleptic. The figure shows DA pathways to the prefrontal cortex, mesolimbic nucleus accumbens and striatum the effects required for an ideal drug on the DA influence and symptoms there and to what extent they are met by most typical and atypical neuroleptics and by clozapine. Note that while all atypical neuroleptics induce few extrapyramidal w side-effects (EPSs) few of them, apart from clozapine, have much beneficial effect in overcoming negative symptoms of schizophrenia ...

Whether the amelioration of negative symptoms results from an action in the cortex and, in particular, the prefrontal cortex requires further study. The fact that clozapine, the atypical drug that is currently most effective in this respect, has actions there which are not shown by other compounds is encouraging even though the precise mechanism by which it works remains to be elucidated. 

Finally, an intriguing possible future therapy arises from a radical idea of Horrobin (2001) that schizophrenia is a nutritional disorder linked to a decreased intake of essential polyunsaturated fatty acids. Recent 31P-MRS studies have shown changes in plasma membrane phospholipids in the neocortex of unmedicated schizophrenics, which would have deleterious consequences on synaptic neurotransmission (Fukuzako, 2001). A clinical trial with the co6 fatty acid derivative ethyleicosa-pentaenoic acid (LAX-101) in patients who had been unresponsive to clozapine, reported that a daily dose of 2g LAX-101 gave a 26% improvement in symptoms over 12 weeks compared with 6% with placebo (Peet and Horrobin, 2001). Maybe in... 

Dopamine receptor blocking agents. Many of the neuroleptics used in the treatment of schizophrenia frequently produce parkinsonian symptoms as unwanted effects. Neuroleptics block dopamine receptors and their therapeutic effect seems to be related to this action. Although these drugs act on DA systems without distinction, some are more selective. Thioridazine, clozapine and molindone, for example, have electrophysiological effects in the limbic region of the brain but little action in the nigro-striatal area. This selectivity may be related to receptor subtype specificity (see Chs 12 and 54). 

---