Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Clouds particle effects

Genovese, D.B., and Lozano, J.E. (2000). Effect of cloud particle characteristics on the viscosity of cloudy apple juice. J. FoodSci. 65, 641-645. [Pg.251]

Ground-based polarimetric observations of some features on the planetary disk indicated the existence of a haze layer overlying the main cloud (especially in subauroral regions). This was confirmed by the results of photopolarimetric observations from Pioneer Venus [24]. The value of the effective radius of the haze particles was about 0.23 micrometers the value of the real part of the refractive index was the same as for the cloud particles. [Pg.377]

Inconsistency of the published estimates of the haze-particle effective radius are discussed in [24, 29, 51]. The cause of the differences is discussed in [53]. Using the assumption that the haze (for heights greater than 66 km) is a continuation of the underlying cloud layer [30], it was shown that stratification of particles should take place due to turbulent intermixing. [Pg.377]

The effect of heating and resultant radiation of any orbiting dust cloud particles around red giants should be also detectable in the IR. The Kuiper belt objects (KBO) start to sublimate because they are heated up to 170 K. This leads to an IR excess at 25 pm. [Pg.139]

There can be subtle but important non-adiabatic effects [14, ll], due to the non-exactness of the separability of the nuclei and electrons. These are treated elsewhere in this Encyclopedia.) The potential fiinction V(R) is detennined by repeatedly solving the quantum mechanical electronic problem at different values of R. Physically, the variation of V(R) is due to the fact that the electronic cloud adjusts to different values of the intemuclear separation in a subtle interplay of mutual particle attractions and repulsions electron-electron repulsions, nuclear-nuclear repulsions and electron-nuclear attractions. [Pg.56]

For any nucHde that decays only by this electron capture process, if one were to produce an atom in which all of the electrons were removed, the effective X would become infinite. An interesting example of this involves the decay of Mn in interstellar space. For its normal electron cloud, Mn decays with a half-life of 312 d and this decay is by electron capture over 99.99% of the time. The remaining decays are less than 0.0000006% by j3 -decay and a possible branch of less than 0.0003% by /5 -decay. In interstellar space some Mn atoms have all of their electrons stripped off so they can only decay by these particle emissions, and therefore their effective half-life is greater than 3 x 10 yr. [Pg.446]

The life persistency of a smoke cloud is deterrnined chiefly by wind and convection currents in the air. Ambient temperature also plays a part in the continuance or disappearance of fog oil smokes. Water vapor in the air has an important role in the formation of most chemically generated smokes, and high relative humidity improves the performance of these smokes. The water vapor not only exerts effects through hydrolysis, but it also assists the growth of hygroscopic (deliquescent) smoke particles to an effective size by a process of hydration. Smoke may be generated by mechanical, thermal, or chemical means, or by a combination of these processes (7). [Pg.401]

A third screening smoke-type is white phosphoms [7723-14-0] (WP), P (see Phosphorus and THE phosphides), which reacts spontaneously with air and water vapor to produce a dense cloud of phosphoms pentoxide [1314-56-3]. An effective screen is obtained as the P2O5 hydrolyzes to form droplets of dilute phosphoric acid aerosol. WP produces smoke in great quantity, but it has certain disadvantages. Because WP has such a high heat of combustion, the smoke it produces from bulk-filled munitions has a tendency to rise in pillarlike mass. This behavior too often nullifies the screening effect, particularly in stiU air. Also, WP is very brittle, and the exploding munitions in which it is used break it into very small particles that bum rapidly. [Pg.401]

Pollution can cause opposite effects in relahon to precipitation. Addition of a few particles that act as ice nuclei can cause ice particles to grow at the expense of supercooled water droplets, producing particles large enough to fall as precipitation. An example of this is commercial cloud seeding with silver iodide particles released from aircraft to induce rain. If too many particles are added, none of them grow sufficiently to cause precipitation. Therefore, the effects of pollution on precipitation are complex. [Pg.144]

Only two possibilities exist for explaining the existence of cloud formation in the atmosphere. If there were no particles to act as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN), water would condense into clouds at relative humidities (RH) of around 300%. That is, air can remain supersaturated below 300% with water vapor for long periods of fime. If this were to occur, condensation would occur on surface objects and the hydrologic cycle would be very different from what is observed. Thus, a second possibility must be the case particles are present in the air and act as CCN at much lower RH. These particles must be small enough to have small settling velocity, stay in the air for long periods of time and be lofted to the top of the troposphere by ordinary updrafts of cm/s velocity. Two further possibilities exist - the particles can either be water soluble or insoluble. In order to understand why it is likely that CCN are soluble, we examine the consequences of the effect of curvature on the saturation water pressure of water. [Pg.144]

Chemical interactions also occur in the condensed phases. Some of these are expected to be quite complex, e.g., the reactions of free radicals on the surfaces of or within aerosol particles. Simpler sorts of interactions also exist. Perhaps the best understood is the acid-base relationship of NH3 with strong acids in aerosol particles and in liquid water (see Chapter 16). Often, the main strong acid in the atmosphere is H2SO4, and one may consider the nature of the system consisting of H2O (liquid), NH3, H2SO4, and CO2 under realistic atmospheric conditions. Carbon dioxide is not usually important to the acidity of atmospheric liquid water (Charlson and Rodhe, 1982) the dominant effects are due to NH3 and H2SO4. The sensitivity the pH of cloud (or rainwater produced from it) to NH3 and... [Pg.152]


See other pages where Clouds particle effects is mentioned: [Pg.299]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.2047]    [Pg.478]    [Pg.480]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.493]    [Pg.376]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.2176]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.675]    [Pg.377]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.382]    [Pg.423]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.1022]    [Pg.1110]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.726]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.450]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.446]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.800 , Pg.801 , Pg.802 , Pg.803 , Pg.804 , Pg.805 , Pg.806 , Pg.807 , Pg.808 , Pg.809 , Pg.810 , Pg.811 , Pg.812 , Pg.813 ]




SEARCH



Particle effects

© 2024 chempedia.info