Classification of animals

Classification of animal viruses Most of the animal viruses which have been studied in any detail have been those which have been amenable to cultivation in cell cultures. As seen, animal viruses are known with either single-stranded or doublestranded DNA or RNA. Some animal viruses are enveloped, others are naked. Size varies greatly, from those large enough to be just visible in the light microscope, to those so tiny that they are hard to see well even in the electron microscope. In the following sections, we will discuss characteristics and manner of multiplication of some of the most important and best-studied animal viruses. 

Ushakov, B.P. (1963). On the classification of animal and plant adaptations and on the role of cytoecology in elaboration of the adaptation concept (In Russian). In The Problems of Animal Cytoecology (B.P. Ushakov, ed.), pp. 5-20. Academii Nauk, Moscow, Leningrad. 

Blackwelder s professional writing expressed the same polarization. His contribution to the first issue of Systematic Zoology, with Alan Boyden, was a broadside against phylo-genists within systematics. Their criticisms were aimed specifically at Dobzhansky, Mayr, Simpson, and Huxley (Blackwelder and Boyden, 1952). Blackwelder (1964) claimed the speciationists have stolen and twisted his generation s revolution in systematics techniques and called for a return to an omnispective approach that he later explained in detail (Blackwelder, 1967). Even his short guide to the classification of animals raised this conflict (Blackwelder, 1963). This polarization continued in private correspondence, where Black-... 

Natural or Artificial Systems —The Eighteenth-Century Controversy on Classification of Animals and Plants and its Philosophical Contexts. In Between Leibniz, Newton, and Kant, edited hy Wolfgang Lefevre, 191-209. Dordrecht Kluwer. 

Huxley, T.H. (1869) An Introduction to the Classification of Animals (London John Churchill Sons), 147pp. 

The importance of hydrolysis potential, ie, whether moisture or water is present, is illustrated by the following example. In the normal dermal toxicity test, namely dry product on dry animal skin, sodium borohydride was found to be nontoxic under the classification of the Federal Hazardous Substances Act. Furthermore, it was not a skin sensitizer. But on moist skin, severe irritation and bums resulted. 

Mottran, H. R., S. N. Dudd, G. J. Lawrence, A. W. Stott, and R. P. Evershed (1999), New chromatographic, mass spectrometric and stable isotope approaches to the classification of degraded animal fats preserved in archaeological pottery,. Chro-matogr. A 833, 209-221. 

Mottram H.R., Dudd S.N., Lawrence G.J., Stott A.W., Evershed R.P., New chromato graphic, mass spectrometry and stable isotope approaches to the classification of degra dated animal fats preserved in archaeological pottery, Journal of Chromatography, 1999, 833, 209 221. 

---