Zoology systematic

Paramacrobiotus gen. nov. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 47,315-321. 

Schill, R.O., Steinbruck, G. (2007). Identification and differentiation of Heterotardigrada and Eutardigrada species by riboprinting. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 45,184-190. 

KristensenNP (1999) Lepidoptera, moths and butterflies, vol 1. Evolution, systematics, and biogeography. In Fischer M (ed) Handbook of zoology, vol IV. Arthropoda Insecta... 

Mayr, E. (1969) Principles of Systematic Zoology. McGraw-Hill, N.Y. 

Galazzo, D.E., Dayanandan, S., Marcogliese, D.J. and McFaughlin, J.D. (2002) Molecular systematics of some North American species of Diplostomum (Digenea) based on rDNA-sequence data and comparisons with European congeners. Canadian Journal of Zoology 80, 2207-221 7. 

Malmberg, C. (1970) The excretory systems and the marginal hooks as a basis for the systematics of Cyrodactylus (Trematoda, Monogenea). Arkiv for Zoologi Serie 2 23, 235. 

Ghiselin, M.T. 1974. A radical solution to the species problem. Systematic Zoology, 23,536-544. 

Species are groups of interbreeding natural populations reproductively isolated from other such groups. (1969. Principles of Systematic Zoology 26). (No word about evolution, —maybe implicitly meant— nor about characters, the notion potentially interbreeding is, correctly, deleted). 

Ball, I.R. (1976). Nature and formulation of biogeographical hypothesis. Systematic Zoology 24, 407-430. 

Sterrer, W. (1972). Systematics and evolution within the Gnathostomulida. Systematic Zoology 21,151-173. 

Archie J (1990) Homoplasy excess statistics and retention indices A reply to Farris. Systematic Zoology 39 169-174... 

Farris JS (1990) The retention index and homoplasy excess. Systematic Zoology 38 406-407... 

Mayr, E., Linsley, E.G., and Usinger, R.L., Methods and Principles of Systematic Zoology, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1953. 

The fact that there is no similar society to serve the interests and viewpoint of the taxonomic workers in zoology has prompted this letter. We, the undersigned, feel that there is a definite need for a Society of Systematic Zoologists and that such an organization can, and will, be of mutual benefit to its members and make a distinct contribution to the welfare and future of systematic zoology. 

First, to provide recognized official support for the point of view of the systematic zoologists so that their needs, as well as their contributions to zoology, may become better known to workers in other fields of science, and to the public in general. 

Second, to serve as a clearing house for workers in systematic zoology, for the exchange of pertinent information and concepts, the identification of specimens, and the advancement of the study of systematic zoology. 

Fifth, to cooperate with existing societies whose membership may be in part or largely made up of individuals interested in systematic zoology in the support of projects of special interest to systematic zoologists. 

Sixth, to provide government agencies and other establishments having need of experts or specialists in systematic zoology with names of those best able to serve them, and... 

---