Chemical incidents nature

The background data should include test groups that show little or no effect of treatment, but these should be listed separately from control fetuses in the report tabulation. If there are structurally similar variations or if a substance of a chemically similar nature has shown a similar incidence of malformations then the findings would appear substance-related. 

In the effects assessment step the relationship between the level of exposure and the incidence, nature, and severity of an (adverse) effect following the exposure is determined. For most types of effects, it is assumed that there is a minimum dose or concentration below which adverse effects will not occur the no effect level or threshold. To determine the threshold, different doses are tested, for most chemical hazards usually in laboratory animals. In toxicology, the highest tested dose without adverse effects is called the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL). Based on the NOAEL established in an experimental study, a human limit value can be calculated, taking into account uncertainties and differences in experimental design and circumstances. Uncertainties and differences are accounted for by uncertainty factors (e.g., for interspecies differences, intraspecies variability, and exposure duration). For some types of substances, it is assumed that every level of exposure can result in adverse effects, in which case no threshold would exist. This, for instance, is assumed to apply for genotoxic carcinogens. 

Because most of the existing studies of PTSD following chemical incidents are predominantly epidemiological in nature, the focus of research has been on sequelae rather than treatment methods and their efficacy. 

The DIM, which was developed from findings of research on natural hazards, can best be applied to chemical incidents that have a well-defined geographic impact area, such as the release of hazardous materials from a fixed site or in transport. To date there has been no research to confirm that the DIM can be applied to incidents lacking a well-defined geographic impact area, such as chemical contamination of food or pharmaceuticals. 

Since chemical incidents are so varied in nature, they are difficult to define. As a result, several definitions are used ... 

One of the main difficulties of a chemical incident is obtaining rapid information on the identity of the chemical or mix of chemicals involved and their health hazards. Disseminating this information is vital and allows medical management to proceed on an adequately informed basis. Evidence of the nature of the released chemical will come from the detection equipment deployed by the fire and special ambulance services and also from the primary assessment of the signs and symptoms of casualties to try and identify characteristic toxidromes. These are considered in Chap. 6. 

When the incidence of occupational diseases was compared with the frequency of OEL violations in Finland, a rather good correlation was observed. This indicates that these OELs are reasonably well defined. This is also natural because they are based on long-term exposure history of a large number of people. However, the OELs for many chemicals are still only educated guesses, and numerous and often large changes have been made when the OEL lists have been revised. In addition, most chemicals still have no OEL. Only about 2000 chemicals have an OEL in some country. ... 

IR spectroscopy is a powerful and readily available orientation characterization technique. It offers a high chemical selectivity since most functional groups absorb at distinct wavelengths (typically in the 2.5-25 pm range (4,000 00 cm-1 range)), which often depend on their local environment. IR spectroscopy thus provides qualitative and quantitative information about the chemical nature of a sample, its structure, interactions, etc. The potential of IR spectroscopy for orientation characterization stems from the fact that absorption only occurs if the electric field vector of the incident radiation, E, has a component parallel to the transition dipole moment, M, of the absorbing entity. The absorbance, A, is given... 

We have to accept, in view of an absence of hypotheses to the contrary (apart from the very earliest literature, see19)), that perception of incident light in any photosensitive system effects a change in the chemical activity or nature of the target site(s). A sensory signal (or signals) then effects expression of the sensory response. 

---