Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Characterization zeolites, methods

The hypotheses and interpretations proposed here need further testing with other zeolite frameworks and additional spectral analysis. Infrared spectroscopy must be used as a supplemental tool to characterize zeolites, along with the more common methods of determining structure and properties e.g., x-ray crystallography, chemical analysis, adsorption, and other characterizations. [Pg.233]

X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD), thermo gravimetric (TGA) analysis, solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and measurements of adsorption isotherms are key methods for characterizing zeolite-like behavior. However, a simple proof for observing structural changes during the sorption processes is XRPD. [Pg.1002]

W.E. Pameth, R.J. Gorte, Methods for characterizing zeolite acidity, Chem. Rev. 95... [Pg.104]

In this chapter we have limited ourselves to the most common techniques in catalyst characterization. Of course, there are several other methods available, such as nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), which is very useful in the study of zeolites, electron spin resonance (ESR) and Raman spectroscopy, which may be of interest for certain oxide catalysts. Also, all of the more generic tools from analytical chemistry, such as elemental analysis, UV-vis spectroscopy, atomic absorption, calorimetry, thermogravimetry, etc. are often used on a routine basis. [Pg.166]

A wide variety of NMR methods are being applied to understand solid acids including zeolites and metal halides. Proton NMR is useful for characterizing Brpnsted sites in zeolites. Many nuclei are suitable for the study of probe molecules adsorbed directly or formed in situ as either intermediates or products. Adsorbates on metal halide powders display a rich carbenium ion chemistry. The interpretation of NMR experiments on solid acids has been greatly improved by Ae integration of theoretical chemistry and experiment. [Pg.573]

In view of catalytic potential applications, there is a need for a convenient means of characterization of the porosity of new catalyst materials in order to quickly target the potential industrial catalytic applications of the studied catalysts. The use of model test reactions is a characterization tool of first choice, since this method has been very successful with zeolites where it precisely reflects shape-selectivity effects imposed by the porous structure of tested materials. Adsorption of probe molecules is another attractive approach. Both types of approaches will be presented in this work. The methodology developed in this work on zeolites Beta, USY and silica-alumina may be appropriate for determination of accessible mesoporosity in other types of dealuminated zeolites as well as in hierarchical materials presenting combinations of various types of pores. [Pg.217]

Alumina is an amphoteric catalyst, which can difficult to characterize via chemical and physic methods. The transformation of cyclopentanol/cyclohexanone mixture allows us to estimate at the same time the acid-base properties of aluminas. From this transformation, it was shown that aluminas can be classified into two families only basic aluminas, such as theta, which were more basic than MgO, and acido-basic aluminas, eta, gamma and delta, which possess an acidic character less pronounced than dealuminated HMOR zeolite... [Pg.224]

The effectiveness of zeolites in catalysis and separation can often be improved by the textural and chemical properties of the matrices in which they are imbedded. Chitosan gels issued from renewable resources are already used as supports for the preparation of heterogeneous catalysts in the form of colloids, flakes or gel beads [1, 2], In this study we present several methods for the incorporation of zeolites in chitosan matrices and characterize the synergic effect of the components on the properties of the composite. [Pg.389]

One difficulty with many synthetic preparations of semiconductor NCs that complicates any interpretation of NMR results is the inevitable distribution of sizes (and exact shapes or surface morphologies). Therefore attempts to make semiconductors as a sort of molecular cluster having a well-defined stoichiometry are of interest to learn potentially about size-dependent NMR parameters and other properties. One approach is to confine the semiconductor inside a template, for instance the cuboctahedral cages of the sodalite framework or other zeolite structures, which have been characterized by multinuclear NMR methods [345-347], including the mesoporous channel material MCM-41 [341, 348]. [Pg.294]

The title Spectroscopy in Catalysis is attractively compact but not quite precise. The book also introduces microscopy, diffraction and temperature programmed reaction methods, as these are important tools in the characterization of catalysts. As to applications, I have limited myself to supported metals, oxides, sulfides and metal single crystals. Zeolites, as well as techniques such as nuclear magnetic resonance and electron spin resonance have been left out, mainly because the author has little personal experience with these subjects. Catalysis in the year 2000 would not be what it is without surface science. Hence, techniques that are applicable to study the surfaces of single crystals or metal foils used to model catalytic surfaces, have been included. [Pg.10]

In this book we describe some the most often used techniques in catalyst characterization (see Fig. 1.5). We will highlight those methods that have been particularly useful in the study of metal, oxide and sulfide catalysts, and related model systems. Zeolites and techniques such as nuclear magnetic resonance [2,3,16] fall outside the scope of this book. A number of books on catalyst characterization are listed in the references [3, 16-22],... [Pg.21]

The currently available quantum chemical computational methods and computer programs have not been utilized to their potential in elucidating the electronic origin of zeolite properties. As more and more physico-chemical methods are used successfully for the description and characterization of zeolites, (e.g. (42-45)), more questions will also arise where computational quantum chemistry may have a useful contribution towards the answer, e.g. in connection with combined approaches where zeolites and metal-metal bonded systems (e.g. (46,47)) are used in combination. The spectacular recent and projected future improvements in computer technology are bound to enlarge the scope of quantum chemical studies on zeolites. Detailed studies on optimum intercavity locations for a variety of molecules, and calculations on conformation analysis and reaction mechanism in zeolite cavities are among the promises what an extrapolation of current developments in computational quantum chemistry and computer technology holds out for zeolite chemistry. [Pg.154]

The discovery of the new class of high-silica zeolites "pentasil" during the last decade has attracted considerable interest due to the important applications of these zeolites in catalysis. The best known member of this family of zeolites is ZSM-5, developed in the Mobil laboratories. The unusual properties of pentasil zeolites have rekindled the interest in other high-silica zeolites, prepared by dea-lumination of low-silica zeolites. In this paper we shall review the preparation methods of aluminum-deficient zeolites, and shall discuss the properties of these materials, with emphasis on recent advances in their characterization. [Pg.157]

Another thermal analysis method available for catalyst characterization is microcalorimetiy, which is based on the measurement of the heat generated or consumed when a gas adsorbs and reacts on the surface of a solid [66-68], This information can be used, for instance, to determine the relative stability among different phases of a solid [69], Microcalorimetiy is also applicable in the measurement of the strengths and distribution of acidic or basic sites as well as for the characterization of metal-based catalysts [66-68], For instance, Figure 1.10 presents microcalorimetry data for ammonia adsorption on H-ZSM-5 and H-mordenite zeolites [70], clearly illustrating the differences in both acid strength (indicated by the different initial adsorption heats) and total number of acidic sites (measured by the total ammonia uptake) between the two catalysts. [Pg.11]


See other pages where Characterization zeolites, methods is mentioned: [Pg.171]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.416]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.789]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.376]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.382]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.132]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.44 , Pg.45 ]




SEARCH



Characterization methods

Characterization zeolites

© 2024 chempedia.info