Catalytic methanol carbonylation cobalt iodide catalyst

The iodide content of the catalyst formulation is the key to avoiding these problems of competing reactions and achieving maximum acetic acid selectivity. The addition of iodide ensures that any initially formed methanol (7) is rapidly (H) converted to the more electrophilic methyl iodide. However, further increases in the quantities of iodide beyond that needed for methanol conversion to methyl iodide may lead to a portion, or all, of the catalytic-ally active cobalt carbonyl reverting to catalytically inactive cobalt iodide species - e.g. the [Col4] anion identified in this work, or possibly the cationic [Co(MeOH) (CO) I species (9). 

Mankind has produced acetic acid for many thousand years but the traditional and green fermentation methods cannot provide the large amounts of acetic acid that are required by today s society. As early as 1960 a 100% atom efficient cobalt-catalyzed industrial synthesis of acetic acid was introduced by BASF, shortly afterwards followed by the Monsanto rhodium-catalyzed low-pressure acetic acid process (Scheme 5.36) the name explains one of the advantages of the rhodium-catalyzed process over the cobalt-catalyzed one [61, 67]. These processes are rather similar and consist of two catalytic cycles. An activation of methanol as methyl iodide, which is catalytic, since the HI is recaptured by hydrolysis of acetyl iodide to the final product after its release from the transition metal catalyst, starts the process. The transition metal catalyst reacts with methyl iodide in an oxidative addition, then catalyzes the carbonylation via a migration of the methyl group, the "insertion reaction". Subsequent reductive elimination releases the acetyl iodide. While both processes are, on paper, 100%... 

Commercial methanol carbonylation processes have employed each of the group 9 metals, cobalt, rhodium and iridium as catalysts. In each case acid and an iodide co-catalyst are required to activate the methanol by converting it into iodomethane (CH3OH + HI CH3I + H2O) catalytic carbonylation of iodomethane into acetyl iodide is followed by hydrolysis to acetic acid. A problem common to all these processes arises because the mixture of HI and acetic acid is highly corrosive this necessitates special techniques for plant construction involving the use of expensive steels. We discuss each catalyst system in turn below. 

Carbonylation and decarbonylation reactions of alkyl complexes in catalytic cycles have been reviewed . A full account of the carbonylation and homologation of formic and other carboxylic acid esters catalysed by Ru/CO/I systems at 200 C and 150-200 atm CO/H2 has appeared. In a novel reaction, cyclobutanones are converted to disiloxycyclopentenes with hydrosilane and CO in the presence of cobalt carbonyl (reaction 4) . The oxidative addition of Mel to [Rh(CO)2l2] in aprotic solvents (MeOH, CHCI3, THF, MeOAc), the rate determining step in carbonylation of methyl acetate and methyl halides, is promoted by iodides, such as Bu jN+I", and bases (eg 1-methylimidazole) . A further kinetic study of rhodium catalysed methanol carbonylation has appeared . The carbonylation of methanol by catalysts prepared by deposition of Rh complexes on silica alumina or zeolites is comparable with the homogeneous analogue . 

Carbonylation of methanol to form acetic acid has been performed industrially using carbonyl complexes of cobalt ( ) or rhodium (2 ) and iodide promoter in the liquid phase. Recently, it has been claimed that nickel carbonyl or other nickel compounds are effective catalysts for the reaction at pressure as low as 30 atm (2/4), For the rhodium catalyst, the conditions are fairly mild (175 C and 28 atm) and the product selectivity is excellent (99% based on methanol). However, the process has the disadvantages that the proven reserves of rhodium are quite limited in both location and quantity and that the reaction medium is highly corrosive. It is highly desirable, therefore, to develop a vapor phase process, which is free from the corrosion problem, utilizing a base metal catalyst. The authors have already reported that nickel on activated carbon exhibits excellent catalytic activity for the carbonylation of... 

In the mid-1960s, Paulik and Roth at Monsanto Co discovered that rhodium and an iodide promoter were more efficient than cobalt, with selectivities of 99% and 85%, with regard to methanol and CO, respectively. Moreover, the reaction is operated under significantly milder conditions such as 40-50 bar pressure and around 190 °C [8]. Even though rhodium was 1000 times more costly than cobalt at this time, Monsanto decided to develop the rhodium-based catalyst system mainly for the selectivity concerns, and thus for the reduction of the process cost induced by the acetic acid purification, even if it was necessary to maintain a 14% w/w level of water in the reactor to keep the stability of the rhodium catalyst. In addition, Paulik et al. [9] demonstrated that iridium can also catalyze the carbonylation of methanol although at a lower rate. However, it is noteworthy that the catalytic system is more stable, especially in the low partial pressure zones of the industrial unit. 

---