Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Catalytic Currents height

In some cases the kinetic currents are small (sometimes 10% or even less) even at their maximum height when compared with waves of the equimolar solutions that are diffusion-controlled. This type of behaviour has been observed in particular in systems in which the waves of are obscured by the supporting electrolyte. However, not all kinetic currents are so small and whilst abnormally small currents may indicate kinetic currents, currents of the normal height do not allow us to exclude the role of chemical reactions. (Some catalytic currents are abnormally high.)... [Pg.36]

Criteria used to distinguish among diffusion, kinetic, adsorption, and catalytic currents include changes in the wave height (limiting current) with (1) concentration of the electroactive species, (2) mercury pressure, (3) pH, (4) buffer concentration, and... [Pg.56]

The techniques of measurement described above proved to be the best in numerous instances. However it is sometimes necessary, in view of the unusual shape of the wave or of special requirements, to choose an alternative measuring technique. Maxima and catalytic currents come into this category. Here the rules of identical measurement techniques in the measurement of compared curves (e.g. of anal)rsed solution and calibration curves) should be followed. It should be stressed that the wave-height is always measured in the direction of one of the ordinates, never on a line perpendicular to some part of the polarographic curve. The use of a soft pencil and ruler to draw lines, and by carrying out the measurements directly on the polarogram, proved to be the most suitable method. [Pg.73]

Upon addition of 1 mM of HOTs, a new reduction peak was observed at around -1.48 and -1.43 V for 12 and 14, respectively. As ean be seen in Figure 9, the current height of the reduction peak aroimd -1.48 and -1.43 V displayed a signifreant increases with an inerease of acid concentration, respectively, whieh showed an eleetrocatalytic response. The cvrrrent intensity of these reduction peaks gradually increased and the potentials were shifted to relatively more negative values with increasing acid concentration. These features are typieal of a catalytic proton reduction process. We conclude that the reduction peaks arotmd -1.48 V for 12 and -1.43 V for 14 display eleetrocatalytic responses to proton reduction. [Pg.209]

The first catalysts reported for the electroreduction of C02 were metallophthalocyanines (M-Pc).126 In aqueous solutions of tetraalkylammonium salts, current-potential curves at a cobalt phthalocyanine (Co-Pc)-coated graphite electrode showed a reduction current peak whose height was proportional to the C02 concentration and to the square root of the potential sweep rate at a given C02 concentration. On electrolysis, oxalic acid and glycolic acid were detected, but formic acid was not. Mn and Pd phthalocyanines were inactive, while Cu and Fe phthalocyanines were slightly active. At the potentials used for C02 reduction, M-Pc catalysts would be in their dinegative state, and the occupied dz2 orbital of the metal ion in the metallophthalocyanine was suggested to play an important role in the catalytic activity. [Pg.368]

The best approach is normally an in situ determination based on voltammetry or charging curves, usually within the hydrogen adsorption region [96]. It is of course necessary to know the actual value of 0H for absolute determinations, but the method is practicable on a relative basis. The method becomes absolute only in a few cases, in particular for Pt electrodes [97] for which the catalytic activity per metal atom, which is the parameter really needed to evaluate electrocatalytic effects, can be calculated [98]. Sometimes, results are reported relative to the surface area measured on the basis of the limiting current for a redox reaction [99], but what is obtained is only the macroscopic surface in which asperities of a height higher than the diffusion layer thickness can only be accounted for. [Pg.11]

The peak height of the SWV net current increases in all the cases with the square wave amplitude until it reaches a constant value (plateau) for sw > lOOmV. This value depends on the electrode shape and size and also on the catalytic rate constants. Under steady-state conditions, the plateau current at microspheres and microdiscs is given by... [Pg.525]

Thus, if three or four different heights of a mercury column are used for the dropping-mercury electrode, the resulting current can be tested by Eq. (3.13). If kinetic or catalytic complications are present, the current will not adhere to this relationship. [Pg.60]

These are also kinetic currents except, that now the chemical reaction or the electrolysis regenerates the original substance on which the height and position of the wave depends. Since this substance is not consumed by the electrolysis, it plays the part of a catalyst and hence the wave it generates is known as a catalytic wave. [Pg.115]

A basic demonstration of the hydrogen sensitivity of an AIGaN/GaN Schottky diode is presented in Fig. 5.8, which shows the linear (Fig. 5.8(a)) and log scale (Fig. 5.8(b)) forward I-V characteristics at 25°C of the HEMT diode, both in air and in a 1 % H2 in air atmosphere. For these diodes, there is a clear increase in current on the introduction of H2, as a result of a lowering of the effective barrier height through the mechanism previously discussed. The H2 catalytically decomposes on the Pt metallization and diffuses rapidly to the interface, where it forms a dipole layer. A more... [Pg.171]

The catalytic double prewave in Ni(II) reduction has been observed in the presence of thiourea [46]. The catalytic character of these currents was proven by high values of the temperature coefficient (7-14 %/K), by the independence of the catalytic wave of the mercury column height (without the drop timing) and by the linear dependence I at vs. The first prewave fits these characteristics strictly, the second one only roughly (influence of the diffusion transport). Nevertheless, the more positive location of both prewaves (with respect to the main wave) stressed their catalytic character. [Pg.177]


See other pages where Catalytic Currents height is mentioned: [Pg.585]    [Pg.562]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.486]    [Pg.562]    [Pg.444]    [Pg.449]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.583]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.576]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.404]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.591]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.560]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.560]    [Pg.771]    [Pg.4973]    [Pg.5323]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.352]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.19 ]




SEARCH



Catalytic current

© 2024 chempedia.info