Carbon dioxide water versus

And so the issue was joined hydroxylation versus peroxidation. It is true that if all of the hydrogen atoms of a saturated hydrocarbon were replaced by hydroxyl groups and if all the carbon to carbon bonds were broken and the carbon atoms completely hydroxylated, the net result would be an equivalent amount of carbon dioxide and water. But this does not constitute proof that these were produced in the manner indicated. In truth, it generally is not clear by what mechanism the hydrogen atoms are converted to hydroxyl groups. 

Fig. 15.19. Quantum efficiency versus potential at various p-type semiconductors in a DMF-0.1 A4TBAP solution containing 5% water under a C02 atmosphere. Monochromatic light of 600 nm was used for p-Si, p-lnP, p-GaAs, and p-CdTe, while light of 400 nm was used for p-GaP. Scan rate 0.1 V/s. (Reprinted from I. Taniguchi, Electrochemical and Photoelectrochemical Reduction of Carbon Dioxide, in Modem Aspects of Electrochemistry, J. O M. Bockris, R. White, and B. E. Conway, eds., No. 20, Fig. 7, p. 357, Plenum, 1989.)...

Examples of the solvent-dependent competition between nucleophilic substitution and / -elimination reactions [i.e. SnI versus Ei and Sn2 versus E2) have already been given in Section 5.3.1 [cf. Table 5-7). A nice example of a dichotomic y9-elimination reaction, which can proceed via an Ei or E2 mechanism depending on the solvent used, is shown in Eq. (5-140a) cf. also Eqs. (5-20) and (5-21) in Section 5.3.1. The thermolysis of the potassium salt of racemic 2,3-dibromo-l-phenylpropanoic acid (A), prepared by bromine addition to ( )-cinnamic acid, yields, in polar solvents [e.g. water), apart from carbon dioxide and potassium bromide, the ( )-isomer of l-bromo-2-phenylethene, while in solvents with low or intermediate polarity e.g. butanone) it yields the (Z)-isomer [851]. 

The second aspect of drying where carbon dioxide is more favorable than water is its low heat of vaporization and subsequently lower energy costs. The heat of vaporization of water is 555 cal/gm for water versus 35 cal/gm of carbon dioxide. This ratio of 16 converts to 6.5 if a per mole basis is considered. If solute loading is poorer for CO2, this may show up in increased energy costs for recycling however. 

A phase diagram of a pure substance is a plot of one system variable against another that shows the conditions at which the substance exists as a solid, a liquid, and a gas. The most common of these diagrams plots pressure on the vertical axis versus temperature on the horizontal axis. The boundaries between the single-phase regions represent the pressures and temperatures at which two phases may coexist. The phase diagrams of water and carbon dioxide are shown in Figure 6.1-1. 

Each patent has somewhat different features and claims. We select one patent for more detailed discussion to highlight certain technical facets of the process. First we explain the (often misunderstood) effect of water on the extractability of caffeine by selective supercritical carbon dioxide. A number of references report that dry carbon dioxide cannot extract caffeine from dry coffee, either green or roasted, but moist carbon dioxide can. The inability of dry carbon dioxide to extract caffeine from coffee should not be misconstrued to mean that dry carbon dioxide cannot dissolve neat caffeine. This same moist-versus-dry effect is experienced if, for example, methylene chloride is used to extract caffeine from coffee. Dry methylene chloride cannot decaffein-ate dry coffee but moistened coffee can be decaffeinated. It is thought that the caffeine is chemically bound in a chlorogenic acid structure present in the coffee bean. Thus, water somehow acts as a chemical agent it frees caffeine from its bound form in the coffee matrix in both the carbon dioxide and the methylene chloride processes. 

One of the more useful diagrams in geochemistry is the predominance diagram. In this, species activities are plotted versus pH, or often as pH versus log/o, and one of the more informative of these is the predominance diagram for aqueous CO2. There are three carbonate species, HjCOj, HCO3, and CO which would result from dissolving carbon dioxide gas in water. We have already calculated the equilibrium constant for one of the relevant ionic equilibria ( 9.3.1) ... 

For a pure substance, the phase diagram is simply a graph of temperature versus pressure. For mixtures, the phase diagram also includes variables that describe the composition of the substance. To illustrate the information contained in a phase diagram, we will examine the phase diagrams of two pure substances water and carbon dioxide. 

Figure 3.28 Adiabatic temperature rise (termed exotherm here) of reformate containing 53.1 vol.% hydrogen, 7.7 voL% carbon monoxide, 7.5 vol.% carbon dioxide, 31.4 vol.% steam and 0.3 vol.% methane versus carbon monoxide conversion by water-gas shift [57. ...

Fig. A4.10 shows scatter plots of experimental HTC values versus calculated HTC values according to Eq. [A4.2], and calculated and experimental values for wall temperarnres. Both plots he along a 45° straight line with an experimental data spread of 25% for the HTC values and 15% for the wall temperatures. This correlation was verified within the following operating conditions water, upward flow, vertical bare tubes with inside diameters of 3—38 mm, pressure of 22.8—29.4 MPa, mass flux of 200—3000 kg/m s, and heat flux of 70—1250kW/m. This correlation can be also used for supercritical carbon dioxide and other fluids. However, its accuracy might be less in these cases.

The molar heats of vaporization of ammonia, carbon dioxide, and water from a typical copper-ammonium-salt solution (mixed formate and carbonate) have been calculated by Zhavoronkov (1939) using the Clausius-Clapeyron equation and the slopes of the log p versus 1/T lines as plotted in Figure 16-23. For the solution illustrated in this figure, he obtained the results in Table 16-19. 

Quantitative analysis of tracer experiments can be more complicated than for isotopic dilution. Consider a hypothetical outcome for pure H2 0 mixed thoroughly with a 10-fold excess of pure H2 0, where all of the oxygen atoms (and only those oxygen atoms) turn up in recovered CO2. Statistically, the carbon dioxide should exhibit a distribution of zero, 1, or 2 labelled oxygens in the proportions m/z 44 m/z 46 m/z 48 = 100 20 1. It is clear that Equation [2] is not the right expression for analysing that result. Moreover, experiment has shown that observed ratios often deviate from statistical proportions because of fractionation factors (i.e. isotope effects that preferentially partition the heavier isotope into one chemical form versus another). The mathematical analysis for doubly labelled water studies, which includes the effects of fractionation factors, is well documented elsewhere. 

---