Capacity constraint resource

TOC should have widespread application in supply chain linkage building. The theory of constraints was introduced in Section 27.4. In formulating this theory, Eli Goldratt and Robert Fox observed that a production system could produce no more than its capacity constraint resource, or CCR. They use this principle as a foundation for what they call the drum-buffer-rope (DBR) way. ... 

The map of the supply chain we ve used will aid the introduction of another concept related to supply chain cost visibility and its effect on clarity in decision making. This concept is the "theory of constraints" or TOC. TOC is the product of thinking by Eliyahu Goldratt, Jeff Cox, and Robert Fox. They make the important observation that, in any operation, there is a "capacity constraint resource" (CCR) that determines the pace at which the operation can produce products. 

Capacity Constraint Resources Where a series of nonbottlenecks, based on the sequence in which they perform their jobs, can act as a constraint. 

The process step causes significant additional costs for capacity installation, personnel and/or maintenance (material and utility costs are part of the recipe and are included irrespective of the capacity modeling approach selected) of the equipment and hence an explicit modeling of resource requirements is required in addition to capacity constraints. 

The additional capacity restriction (3.98) accounts for the capacity of the shared resource. In order to determine shared-resource capacity, restriction (3.99) can be used if the number of equipment units is correlated with the number of production lines installed at a plant. In combination with the integrality restriction (3.100) it enforces the step-wise increase of the shard resource capacity in line with the development of overall plant capacity. For example, if for every three production lines one equipment unit is to be installed, the second unit will be installed once the fourth production line is put into operation. If the model is to select the number of equipment units independently, restriction (3.99) has to be deactivated. Finally, for the option to temporarily shut down production lines capacity constraint 24 needs to be modified as shown above. 

Section 3.1.8 Constraints. Describes major constraints on the project. Includes those things the project cannot or will not do. Also includes funding, personnel, facilities, manufacturing capability/capacity, critical resources, or other constraints. 

Once demand is known or forecast, and once the constraints are identified resources might have to be added or perhaps reduced to meet the expected demand. If demand changes capacity will need to be adjusted to meet the new demand. If there is insufficient capacity, customers must either wait for delivery or if they are not prepared to wait they will be lost. If there is too much capacity, then resources will be under utilized, and stock holding with all the attendant costs of stock holding will increase. For many organizations under utilization of resources and holding of buffer and reserve stock might be considered more profitable than the loss of customers. 

The theory of constraints (TOC) is a management philosophy developed by Goldratt (1992). The theory is that the output of an organization is limited (constrained) by internal resources, market factors and by policy. Resource constraint means not enough resources to meet demand, market constraints mean capacity is more than the market demands, and a policy constraint (i.e. a policy of no overtime) can limit output. TOC tries to improve system performance by focusing and eliminating constraints. In service operations where it is often difficult to quantify the capacity constraint, TOC can be very useful. For companies that employ skilled workers and for many service organizations the constraint is often the time of one or a few key employees. The key steps in this process are ... 

The Interactions between availability of resources, carbon gaining capacity, and the allocation of carbon to plant functions, Including chemical defense, will obviously differ among environments. We examine a particular system, the temperate deciduous forest, to Illustrate the nature of the constraints on chemical defenses Imposed by limitations on carbon gain. 

The integration of capital expenditures for the shared resources as shown in equation (3.11a) rests on the assumption that the number of equipments is correlated to the number of production lines. If the model can independently select the shared resource capacity, it is theoretically possible that the number of shared resources operated increases while the number of production lines used decreases. In this case a separate calculation of the investment expenditures for shared resources is required to avoid that "negative" capital expenditures from capacity reductions that are eliminated via the non-negativity constraint (3.54) offset the expenditures for shared resource installations. 

In model constraints given next, Q is a wrap-around operator (Shat et al., 1993), r, holds the duration of tasks in number of time intervals (5=8 h) and set K, gives the tasks belonging to chemical z. The objective function minimizes the total cost of the schedule in relative money units (r.m.u.). Eq 2 ensures that the volume handled by the task does not exceed the capacity of the vessel Vm. Eq 3 ensures that material production only occurs if the corresponding task is executed. The periodic schedule features exactly one batch of each chemical (eq 4). Eqs 5-6 are the excess resource balances. Eq 7 ensures that the start-up procedure does not require more units than those available. 

---