Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Calculations contact opening

Trasatti ° assumed that the value of at ct = 0 is constant (-0.31 V) and independent of the nature of the solvent. Therefore, if the contact potential difference at cr = 0 is known, the values of Sx for a given metal can be calculated. It should be noted that the idea that the potential shift due to the interaction of metal electrons with solvent is independent of the nature of the solvent is open to criticism. For example, the local solvent field can interfere with electron distribution in the metal in the vicinity of the interface. The data obtained for a mercury electrode and different solvents show that the contact potential difference is mainly determined by the orientation of solvent dipoles at the interface. The positive values of gjUdip)o are due to orientation of the solvent dipoles with their negative ends directed toward the mercury surface. [Pg.21]

The hlters must be designed and fastened to allow an easy removal to change the hlter and to keep a perfect peripheral airtightness. They must be provided with differential manometer to check them, (option equipped with maximum contact point). An obturable opening (+/- 100 mm) must be placed before the fan section to inject the DOP. The number of terminal hlters must be calculated to guarantee the same air velocity out of the... [Pg.45]

We have previously defined the one-electron spin-density matrix in the context of standard HF methodology (Eq. (6.9)), which includes semiempirical methods and both the UHF and ROHF implementations of Hartree-Fock for open-shell systems. In addition, it is well defined at the MP2, CISD, and DFT levels of theory, which permits straightforward computation of h.f.s. values at many levels of theory. Note that if the one-electron density matrix is not readily calculable, the finite-field methodology outlined in the last section allows evaluation of the Fermi contact integral by an appropriate perturbation of the quantum mechanical Hamiltonian. [Pg.328]

Figure 11.5 Dependence of friction on load for a single microcontact. The friction force between a silica sphere of 5 //in diameter and an oxidized silicon wafer is shown (filled symbols). Different symbols correspond to different silica particles. The solid line is a fitted friction force using a constant shear strength and the JKR model to calculate the true contact area (based on Eq. (6.68)). Results obtained with five different silanized particles (using hexamethylsililazane) on silanized silica are shown as open symbols. Redrawn after Ref. [467]. Figure 11.5 Dependence of friction on load for a single microcontact. The friction force between a silica sphere of 5 //in diameter and an oxidized silicon wafer is shown (filled symbols). Different symbols correspond to different silica particles. The solid line is a fitted friction force using a constant shear strength and the JKR model to calculate the true contact area (based on Eq. (6.68)). Results obtained with five different silanized particles (using hexamethylsililazane) on silanized silica are shown as open symbols. Redrawn after Ref. [467].
Having downcomers configured, the tray active area (ft2) is calculated next. The tray active area is defined as that area of tray cross section open to vapor-liquid contact. Downcomer areas and their inlets and... [Pg.87]

Fig. 11. (A) Force normalised by radius as a function of surface separation between mica surfaces in 0.01 wt.% acetic acid solution (pH 3.8). The arrow indicates a jump from a force barrier into molecular contact. (B) Forces between mica surfaces coated with chitosan across 0.01 wt.% acetic acid solution (pH 3.8). Two sets of measurements are shown. Filled and open symbols represent the forces measured on approach and separation, respectively, after 24 h of adsorption. The crosses represent the forces measured at pH 3.8 after the cycle of exposing chitosan adsorption layers for solutions of increasing alkalinity and measuring forces at pH 4.9, 6.2 and 9.1. The solid lines represent theoretically calculated DLVO forces. Redrawn with permission from Ref. [132]. 1992, American Chemical Society. Fig. 11. (A) Force normalised by radius as a function of surface separation between mica surfaces in 0.01 wt.% acetic acid solution (pH 3.8). The arrow indicates a jump from a force barrier into molecular contact. (B) Forces between mica surfaces coated with chitosan across 0.01 wt.% acetic acid solution (pH 3.8). Two sets of measurements are shown. Filled and open symbols represent the forces measured on approach and separation, respectively, after 24 h of adsorption. The crosses represent the forces measured at pH 3.8 after the cycle of exposing chitosan adsorption layers for solutions of increasing alkalinity and measuring forces at pH 4.9, 6.2 and 9.1. The solid lines represent theoretically calculated DLVO forces. Redrawn with permission from Ref. [132]. 1992, American Chemical Society.
Distributed circuit methods use coaxial lines, waveguides and resonant cavities at microwave frequencies. The circuits are designed for measuring an attenuation factor and a phase factor, from which sample dielectric properties can be calculated. The sample may form the dielectric medium between the two conductors of a coaxial line (Scaife et al, 1971), or an open coaxial line is brought into contact with the sample surface (Roussy and Pearce, 1995). Fagan et al, (2004) used an open coaxial line method to demonstrate that the moisture and salt contents of processed cheese could be predicted by measuring dielectric properties over a range of frequencies. [Pg.770]

Figure 1.33. Advancing and receding contact angles vs surface fraction of Mo, for a triple line moving along the two directions of the composite surface shown on Figure 1.32. Open symbols calculated data, full symbols experimental data from work reported in (Naidich et al. 1995). Figure 1.33. Advancing and receding contact angles vs surface fraction of Mo, for a triple line moving along the two directions of the composite surface shown on Figure 1.32. Open symbols calculated data, full symbols experimental data from work reported in (Naidich et al. 1995).

See other pages where Calculations contact opening is mentioned: [Pg.150]    [Pg.362]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.498]    [Pg.544]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.371]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.506]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.512]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.362]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.400]    [Pg.1008]    [Pg.1181]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.461]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.667]    [Pg.142]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.243 ]




SEARCH



Calculations (contact

Calculations opening

Contact opening

Open contact

© 2024 chempedia.info