Calculation Details

Energy dissipation rate per unit mass of fluid (ranges 570 < Ns < 1420) fluid and sphere, m/s. Cq,. = drag coefficient for single particle fixed in fluid at velocity i>,.. See 5-27-G for calculation details and other applica- ... 

Pages 1 and 2 list all the calculation details and execute a calculation for the center point condition of the former statistical study. This is done at 70 atmospheres hydrogen, 25 atmospheres carbon monoxide, and 5 atmospheres of methanol (all partial pressures), and at 485 K temperature. This is a test case because we know that the rate is 4 mol/m s at these conditions, and this is satisfied here. 

Numerical errors due are controlled by limiting the calculational detail. 

Generally, explosions liave an identifiable accidental, natural, or intentional cause. Table 7.4.4 lists a nmiiber of explosion sources according to tliese tliree allegories. Extensive calculational details on a host of ex-plosion types is available in tlie literaulure. ... 

Generally, the slope factor is a plausible upper bound estimate of the probability of a response per unit intake of a ehemieal over a lifetime. The slope factor is used in risk assessments to estimate an upper-bound lifetime probability of an individual developing cancer as a result of e.xposure to a particular level of a potential carcinogen. Slope factors should always be accompanied by the weight-of-evidence classification to indicate the strength of the evidence that the agent is a human carcinogen. Calculational details are presented below. 

The outer and inner tubes extend from separate stationary tube sheets. The process fluid is heated or cooled by heat transfer to/from the outer tube s outside surface. The overall heat transfer coefficient for the O.D. of the inner tube is found in the same manner as for the double-pipe exchanger. The equivalent diameter of the annulus uses the perimeter of the O.D. of the inner tube and the I.D. of the inner tube. Kem presents calculation details. 

The same examples as before are considered and the equations of combustion written, without giving ali the calculation details. 

MATLAB calculation details and plots can be found on our Web Support. You should observe that Cohen-Coon and Ziegler-Nichols tuning relations lead to roughly 74% and 64% overshoot, respectively, which are more significant than what we expect with a quarter decay ratio criterion. 

For both calculational details as well as for a discussion of this approximation and its relation to other approaches we refer to [4] here we only emphasize its structure. The first term on the rhs is simply the pressure of free massive particles. Written in the form p = pld(T, m) — B(T), the function B is related to m(T) such that the entropy s = dp/dT reduces, due to the stationarity of Q, to the entropy sld(T, m) of an ideal gas. 

The p-value calculation detailed in the previous section gives what we call a two-tailed or a two-sided test since we calculate p by taking into account values of the test statistic equal to, or more extreme, than that observed, in both directions. So... 

We have seen that the ab initio self-consistent quantum mechanical functional methods such as DFT/B3LYP with the chosen 6-31+G(d,p) basis sets are well suited to calculate reasonable molecular ion structures and vibrational spectra of these ions. The results obtained by us or others have indicated that the neglect of the presence of cation-anion interactions is a reasonable approximation for a rather successful prediction of the Raman spectra. Based on such calculations, detailed and reliable assignments of the spectra can be given and information on conformational equilibria can be obtained. 

As each term is handled in the same way, we give the calculation details for one of them, say, for... 

We will give the calculation details for the case of the subalgebra Mi only, since the remaining subalgebras are handled in a similar way. For the case in... 

Reproducibility Are results sensitive to slight changes in calculation details, and if so, why ... 

Hernandez and Catlow (86) recently reported an investigation of n-butane and of n-hexane diffusion in silicalite the work is similar to that of June et al. (85). Many calculation details were the same as in the earlier work, including the assumption of identical Lennard-Jones coefficients of intermolecular dispersion and repulsion. Simulations were performed at different loadings for butane, namely, 2, 4, 5.3, and 8 molecules per unit cell. In addition, simulations were performed at a constant loading and variable temperature (200, 300, and 400 K) for both butane and hexane. These calculations were performed for 1000 ps, twice the length of those of June et al. The zeolite framework was held rigid. 

The nature of the methanol-zeolite interaction has been shown to be sensitive to a number of parameters and as such has proved to be a good benchmark for judging the reliability of quantum chemical methods. Not only are there a number of possible modes whereby one and two molecules interact with an acidic site (245), the barrier to proton transfer is small and sensitive to calculation details. Recent first-principles simulations (236-238) suggest that the nature of adsorbed methanol may be sensitive to the topology of the zeolite pore. The activation and reaction of methane, ethane, and isobutane have been characterized by using reliable methods and models, and realistic activation energies for catalytic reactions have been obtained. 

---