Branching star polymers

For the subsequent generation of arborescent graft polystyrenes, a dramatic increase in rj0 was observed by Hempenius et al. [43] for each of the three series included in their study. However, despite this increase in viscosity, the rj0 for each of these is still lower than that of the linear homologue polystyrenes of the same overall molecular weight. This jump in viscosity is due to an increase in branch density which in turn results in increase in chain extension similar to that observed by Roovers [31] for highly branched star polymers. 

Hecht, S. Vladimirov, N. Erechet, J.M. Encapsulation of functional moieties within branched star polymers effect of chain length and solvent on site isolation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001,123, 18-25. 

Sikorski and Romiszowski455 study confined branched star polymers by on-lattice MC simulation. Attractive forces are excluded and only excluded volume accounted for, thus making the simulations relevant for chains in a good solvent. Contrary to expectation, they find that the diffusion constant is very similar for either moderate or highly confined chains and scales approximately as A 1, though a more accurate representation is suggested by... 

When a is close to unity this equation will predict strongly enhanced values of the temperature coefficient of a for brandied polymers because of the presence of the term in poor agreement with perturbation theory which predicts quite small effects. For a six-branched star polymer for example Eq. (15) predicts a 300% increase while perturbation theory gives only 13%. It seems that i values obtained in this manner will be seriously underestimated. 

In the late 1990s, Penczek and co-workers described the synthesis of highly branched (star) polymers by reacting oligomeric alcoholates obtained by ring-opening polymerization of ethylene oxide (EO) with various diepoxides. One possible reaction sequence of the reaction is shown in Scheme 1. This approach can be seen as the first self-condensing ROP (SCROP) synthesis (see below) to obtain hyperbranched polymers. 

It is conceivable that at this point, a second difunctional monomer could be added giving a star polymer with two different kinds of branches, but normally, the reactor would be opened and the reaction terminated. From the structure above, there are Q) — 1) moles of DVB per mole of star branches, where b is the average number of branches per star. Since the number of moles of star molecules is equal to the moles of living chains over the average number of branches, and with an initiator such as -BuLi ( -butyl lithium), each molecule starts one living chain to make a Z)-branch star polymer, one must add... 

In this example, X is difunctional and the product is linear. If the fiinctionahty of X is higher, the product is branched, ie, it is a star polymer. 

Highly branched polymers, polymer adsorption and the mesophases of block copolymers may seem weakly connected subjects. However, in this review we bring out some important common features related to the tethering experienced by the polymer chains in all of these structures. Tethered polymer chains, in our parlance, are chains attached to a point, a line, a surface or an interface by their ends. In this view, one may think of the arms of a star polymer as chains tethered to a point [1], or of polymerized macromonomers as chains tethered to a line [2-4]. Adsorption or grafting of end-functionalized polymers to a surface exemplifies a tethered surface layer [5] (a polymer brush ), whereas block copolymers straddling phase boundaries give rise to chains tethered to an interface [6],... 

Blood compatibility see Biocompatibility Born-Oppenheimer separation 180, 182 Branch points, labeled 164 Branches, in star polymers 162... 

For star polymers a value of e = 0.5 has been obtained (1, V7) and studies (18) of model comb polymers indicate a value of 1.5. Other work (191 has suggested that e is near 0.5 at low LCB frequencies. For a random LCB conformation of higher branching frequency an e value between 0.7 and 1.3 might be expected, i.e. somewhere between a star and a comb configuration. 

Star-shaped polymer molecules with long branches not only increase the viscosity in the molten state and the steady-state compliance, but the star polymers also decrease the rate of stress relaxation (and creep) compared to a linear polymer (169). The decrease in creep and relaxation rate of star-shaped molecules can be due to extra entanglements because of the many long branches, or the effect can be due to the suppression of reptation of the branches. Linear polymers can reptate, but the bulky center of the star and the different directions of the branch chains from the center make reptation difficult. 

Tomalia, D.A. and Dewald, J.R., Dense star polymers having core, core branches, terminal groups. US Patent 4,507,466, filed January 7, 1983, published March 26, 1985. 

The molecular characterization of a polymeric material is a crucial step in elucidating the relationship between its properties (e.g., mechanical, thermal), its chemical structure, and its morphology. As a matter of fact, the development of a new product stems invariably from a good knowledge of the above relationships. Characterization of polymers is often a difficult task because polymers display a variety of architectures, including linear, cyclic, and branched chains, dendrimers, and star polymers with different numbers of arms. 

Different types of LCB are distinguished. Star polymers are the simplest branched polymers because they have only one branch point. Regular star polymers have a branch point with a constant number (functionality,/) of arms and every arm has the same molecular weight. They are therefore monodisperse polymers. Star polymers may also have arms with a most probable distribution [5], Star polymers can also be polydisperse due to a variable functionality. Palm tree [6] or umbrella polymers [7] that contain a single arm with different molecular weight (MW) than the other arms are classified under the asymmetric star [8] polymers, see Figure 3.2. 

---