Star branched polymers reptation theory

Despite these complications, there are now numerous evidences that the tube model is basically con-ect. The signatory mark that the chain is trapped in a tube is that the chain ends relax first, and the center of the chain remains unrelaxed until relaxation is almost over. Evidence that this occurs has been obtained in experiments with chains whose ends are labeled, either chemically or isotopically (Ylitalo et al. 1990 Russell et al. 1993). These studies show that the rate of relaxation of the chain ends is distinctively faster than the middle of the chain, in quantitative agreement with reptation theory. The special role of chain ends is also shown indirectly in studies of the relaxation of star polymers. Stars are polymers in which several branches radiate from a single branch point. The arms of the star cannot reptate because they are anchored at the branch point (de Gennes 1975). Relaxation must thus occur by the slower process of primitive-path fluctuations, which is found to slow down exponentially with increasing arm molecular weight, in agreement with predictions (Pearson and Helfand 1984). 

Complex Architectures. Perhaps the most significant recent advances in molecular understanding of polymer melts have emerged from the study of branched polymer architectures. We have noted above how a tube theory for star-polymers provided the means to treat fluctuations in entangled path length in linear polymers (see Figure lb). This is simply due to the complete suppression of reptation in star polymers without fluctuation there is no stress-relaxation at all ... 

Finally, we remark that the idea of self-consistent dynamic dilution was applied first by Marrucci [20] to the case of monodisperse linear polymers, and was then adapted by BaU and McLeish [11] to monodisperse stars. We also note that theories combining reptation, primitive path fluctuations, and constraint release by dynamic dilution have been applied successfully by Milner and McLeish and coworkers to monodisperse linear polymers [21], monodisperse stars [13], bimodal star/star blends [22], and star/linear blends [23], as well as H-branched polymers [24], and combs [25]. The approach taken for all these cases is similar at early times after a small step strain, the star arms and the tips of linear molecules relax by primitive path fluctuations and dynamic dilution. At some later time, if there are linear chains that reach their reptation time, there is a rapid relaxation of these linear chains. This produces a dilation of the effective tubes that surround any remaining unrelaxed star arms by constraint-release Rouse motion (see Section 7.3). Finally, after dilation has finished, the primitive path fluctuations of remaining portions of star arms begin again, in the dilated tube. We refer to this set of theories for stars, linears, and mixtures thereof as the Milner-McLeish theory . The details of the Milner-McLeish theory are beyond the scope of this work, but the interested reader can learn more from the original articles as well as from McLeish and Milner [26], McLeish [14], Park and Larson [27], and by Watanabe [19]. 

The case of star/linear blends is a challenging one, because the description of constraint release that works best for pure star polymers is dynamic dilution, while for pure linear polymers, double reptation , or some variant of it, seems to be the better description. However, Milner, McLeish and coworkers [23] have developed a rather successful theory for the case of star/ linear blends. In the Milner-McLeish theory, at early times after a step strain both the star branches and the ends of the linear chains relax by primitive-path fluctuations combined with dynamic dilution, the latter causing the effective tube diameter to slowly increase with time. Then, at a time corresponding to the reptation time of the linear chains, the tube surrounding the unrelaxed star arms increases rather quickly, because of the sudden reptation of the linear chains. The increase in the tube diameter would be very abrupt, if it were not slowed by inclusion of the constraint release-Rouse processes, which leads to a square-root-in-time decay in the modulus (see Section 7.3). With this formulation, the Milner-McLeish theory yields very favorable predictions of polybutadiene data for star/linear blends see Fig. 9.13, where the parameters have the same values as were used for pure linears and pure stars. 

For both linear and star polymers, the above-described theories assume the motion of a single molecule in a frozen system. In polymers melts, it has been shown, essentially from the study of binary blends, that a self-consistent treatment of the relaxation is required. This leads to the concepts of "constraint release" whereby a loss of segmental orientation is permitted by the motion of surrounding species. Retraction (for linear and star polymers) as well as reptation may induce constraint release [16,17,18]. In the homopol5mier case, the main effect is to decrease the relaxation times by roughly a factor of 1.5 (xb) or 2 (xq). In the case of star polymers, the factor v is also decreased [15]. These effects are extensively discussed in other chapters of this book especially for binary mixtures. In our work, we have assumed that their influence would be of second order compared to the relaxation processes themselves. However, they may contribute to an unexpected relaxation of parts of macromolecules which are assumed not to be reached by relaxation motions (central parts of linear chains or branch point in star polymers). 

All these observed characteristics of viscoelasticity for star polymers are natural consequences of the tube model. As suggested by the sketch in Fig. 3.49, the presence of even one long branch would surely suppress reptation [53]. There is no longer any direction for the star to move freely into new positions and conformations, and accordingly relaxation and diffusion must occur by some other motion. The Pearson-Helfand theory for stars based on tube-length fluctuations alone [72]... 

---