Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Boundary layers defined

Fig. 6.4 Streamlines for two axisymmetric Hiemenz stagnation flow situations having different outer velocity gradients, one at a = 1 s 1 and the other at a = 5 s—. Both cases are for air flow at atmospheric pressure and T = 300 K. The streamlines are plotted to an axial height of 3 cm and a radius of 10 cm. However, the solution itself has infinite radial extent in both the axial and radial directions. In both cases the streamlines are separated by 2jt A l = 2.0 x 10-5 kg/s. The shape of the scaled radial velocities V = v/r is plotted on the right of the figures. The maximum value of the scaled radial velocity is Vmax = a/2. Even though streamlines show curvature everywhere, the viscous region is confined to the boundary layer defined by the region of V variation. Outside of this region the flow behaves as though it is inviscid. Fig. 6.4 Streamlines for two axisymmetric Hiemenz stagnation flow situations having different outer velocity gradients, one at a = 1 s 1 and the other at a = 5 s—. Both cases are for air flow at atmospheric pressure and T = 300 K. The streamlines are plotted to an axial height of 3 cm and a radius of 10 cm. However, the solution itself has infinite radial extent in both the axial and radial directions. In both cases the streamlines are separated by 2jt A l = 2.0 x 10-5 kg/s. The shape of the scaled radial velocities V = v/r is plotted on the right of the figures. The maximum value of the scaled radial velocity is Vmax = a/2. Even though streamlines show curvature everywhere, the viscous region is confined to the boundary layer defined by the region of V variation. Outside of this region the flow behaves as though it is inviscid.
The ratio between the local shear stress in the boundary layer defined by (5.246) and the shear stress at the wall given by (1.359), yields ... [Pg.627]

The thin region near the body surface, which is known as the boundary layer, lends itself to relatively simple analysis by the very fact of its thinness relative to the dimensions of the body. A fundamental assumption of the boundary layer approximation is that the fluid immediately adjacent to the body surface is at rest relative to the body, an assumption that appears to be valid except for very low-pressure gases, when the mean free path of the gas molecules is large relative to the body [6]. Thus the hydrodynamic or velocity boundary layer 8 may be defined as the region in which the fluid velocity changes from its free-stream, or potential flow, value to zero at the body surface (Fig. 1.3). In reality there is no precise thickness to a boundary layer defined in this manner, since the velocity asymptotically approaches the free-stream value. In practice we simply imply that the boundary layer thickness is the distance in which most of the velocity change takes place. [Pg.24]

Thickness of the diffusion layer Thickness of the Prandtl boundary layer Defined by Eq. (5.34)... [Pg.306]

The comparison of the magnitude of the two resistances clearly indicates whether tire metal or the slag mass transfer is rate-determining. A value for the ratio of the boundary layer thicknesses can be obtained from the Sherwood number, which is related to the Reynolds number and the Schmidt number, defined by... [Pg.325]

Considering the case of Eq. (4.244), it is normal to describe a real mass transfer case by taking into consideration the boundary layer flows and the turbulence by using a mass transfer factor which is defined by... [Pg.129]

The probability density function of u is shown for four points in Fig. 11.16, two points in the wall jet and two points in the boundary layer close to the floor. For the points in the wall jet (Fig. 11.16<2) the probability (unction shows a preferred value of u showing that the flow has a well-defined mean velocity and that the velocity is fluctuating around this mean value. Close to the floor near the separation at x/H = I (Fig. 11.16f ) it is hard to find any preferred value of u, which shows that the flow is irregular and unstable with no well-defined mean velocity and large turbulent intensity. From Figs. 11.15 and 11.16 we can see that LES gives us information about the nature of the turbulent fluctuations that can be important for thermal comfort. This type of information is not available from traditional CFD using models. [Pg.1049]

Indeed, the multi-layered model, applied to fiber reinforced composites, presented a basic inconsistency, as it appeared in previous publications17). This was its incompatibility with the assumption that the boundary layer, constituting the mesophase between inclusions and matrix, should extent to a thickness well defined by thermodynamic measurements, yielding jumps in the heat capacity values at the glass-transition temperature region of the composites. By leaving this layer in the first models to extent freely and tend, in an asymptotic manner, to its limiting value of Em, it was allowed to the mesophase layer to extend several times further, than the peel anticipated from thermodynamic measurements, fact which does not happen in its new versions. [Pg.174]

The novel element in these models is the introduction of a third phase in the Hashin-Rosen model, which lies between the two main phases (inclusions and matrix) and contributes to the progressive unfolding of the properties of the inclusions to those of the matrix, without discontinuities. Then, these models incoporate all transition properties of a thin boundary-layer of the matrix near the inclusions. Thus, this pseudo-phase characterizes the effectiveness of the bonding between phases and defines a adhesion factor of the composite. [Pg.175]

The thickness of the boundary layer may be arbitrarily defined as the distance from the surface at which the velocity reaches some proportion (such as 0.9, 0.99, 0.999) of the undisturbed stream velocity. Alternatively, it may be possible to approximate to the velocity profile by means of an equation which is then used to give the distance from the surface at which the velocity gradient is zero and the velocity is equal to the stream velocity. Difficulties arise in comparing the thicknesses obtained using these various definitions, because velocity is changing so slowly with distance that a small difference in the criterion used for the selection of velocity will account for a very large difference in the corresponding thickness of the boundary layer. [Pg.663]

When a viscous fluid flows over a surface it is retarded and the overall flowrate is therefore reduced. A non-viscous fluid, however, would not be retarded and therefore a boundary layer would not form. The displacement thickness 8 is defined as the distance the surface would have to be moved in the 7-direction in order to obtain the same rate of flow with this non-viscous fluid as would be obtained for the viscous fluid with the surface retained at x = 0. [Pg.673]

If the velocity profile is the same for all stream velocities, the shear stress must be defined by specifying the velocity ux at any distance y from the surface. The boundary layer thickness, determined by the velocity profile, is then no longer an independent variable so that the index of < in equation 11.25 must be zero or ... [Pg.676]

The relations between ux and y have already been obtained for both streamline and turbulent flow. A relation between and y for streamline conditions in the boundary layer is now derived, although it is not possible to define the conditions in the turbulent boundary layer sufficiently precisely to derive a similar expression for that case. [Pg.687]

In the Taylor-Prandtl modification of the theory of heat transfer to a turbulent fluid, it was assumed that the heat passed directly from the turbulent fluid to the laminar sublayer and the existence of the buffer layer was neglected. It was therefore possible to apply the simple theory for the boundary layer in order to calculate the heat transfer. In most cases, the results so obtained are sufficiently accurate, but errors become significant when the relations are used to calculate heat transfer to liquids of high viscosities. A more accurate expression can be obtained if the temperature difference across the buffer layer is taken into account. The exact conditions in the buffer layer are difficult to define and any mathematical treatment of the problem involves a number of assumptions. However, the conditions close to the surface over which fluid is flowing can be calculated approximately using the universal velocity profile,(10)... [Pg.727]

For the inlet length of a pipe in which the boundary layers are forming, the equations in the previous section will give an approximate value for the heat transfer coefficient. It should be remembered, however, that the flow in the boundary layer at the entrance to the pipe may be streamline and the point of transition to turbulent flow is not easily defined. The results therefore are, at best, approximate. [Pg.731]

Open-channel monoliths are better defined. The Sherwood (and Nusselt) number varies mainly in the axial direction due to the formation ofa hydrodynamic boundary layer and a concentration (temperature) boundary layer. Owing to the chemical reactions and heat formation on the surface, the local Sherwood (and Nusselt) numbers depend on the local reaction rate and the reaction rate upstream. A complicating factor is that the traditional Sherwood numbers are usually defined for constant concentration or constant flux on the surface, while, in reahty, the catalytic reaction on the surface exhibits different behavior. [Pg.353]

With turbulent channel flow the shear rate near the wall is even higher than with laminar flow. Thus, for example, (du/dy) ju = 0.0395 Re u/D is vaHd for turbulent pipe flow with a hydraulically smooth wall. The conditions in this case are even less favourable for uniform stress on particles, as the layer flowing near the wall (boundary layer thickness 6), in which a substantial change in velocity occurs, decreases with increasing Reynolds number according to 6/D = 25 Re", and is very small. Considering that the channel has to be large in comparison with the particles D >dp,so that there is no interference with flow, e.g. at Re = 2300 and D = 10 dp the related boundary layer thickness becomes only approx. 29% of the particle diameter. It shows that even at Re = 2300 no defined stress can be exerted and therefore channels are not suitable model reactors. [Pg.48]

Cherry and Papoutsakis [33] refer to the exposure to the collision between microcarriers and influence of turbulent eddies. Three different flow regions were defined bulk turbulent flow, bulk laminar flow and boundary-layer flow. They postulate the primary mechanism coming from direct interactions between microcarriers and turbulent eddies. Microcarriers are small beads of several hundred micrometers diameter. Eddies of the size of the microcarrier or smaller may cause high shear stresses on the cells. The size of the smallest eddies can be estimated by the Kolmogorov length scale L, as given by... [Pg.129]

Another device that finds frequent use is the stirred cell shown in Fig. 20-54. This device uses a membrane coupon at the bottom of the reservoir with a magnetic stir bar. Stirred cells use low fluid volumes and can be used in screening and R D studies to evaluate membrane types and membrane properties. The velocity profiles have been well defined (Schlichting, Boundary Layer Theory, 6th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968, pp. 93-99). [Pg.40]

Figure 3.18 A typical photograph defining the bubble boundary layer (pi - 500 psia, Vi - 1 ft/sec. 7 a, - 7] = 200°F, q/A = 0.804 x 10f) Btu/hr ft2). (From Jiji and Clark, 1964. Copyright 1964 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York. Reprinted with permission.)... Figure 3.18 A typical photograph defining the bubble boundary layer (pi - 500 psia, Vi - 1 ft/sec. 7 a, - 7] = 200°F, q/A = 0.804 x 10f) Btu/hr ft2). (From Jiji and Clark, 1964. Copyright 1964 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York. Reprinted with permission.)...
The limitation of using such a model is the assumption that the diffusional boundary layer, as defined by the effective diffusivity, is the same for both the solute and the micelle [45], This is a good approximation when the diffusivities of all species are similar. However, if the micelle is much larger than the free solute, then the difference between the diffusional boundary layer of the two species, as defined by Eq. (24), is significant since 8 is directly proportional to the diffusion coefficient. If known, the thickness of the diffusional boundary layer for each species can be included directly in the definition of the effective diffusivity. This approach is similar to the reaction plane model which has been used to describe acid-base reactions. [Pg.143]

Early investigators assumed that this so-called diffusion layer was stagnant (Nernst-Whitman model), and that the concentration profile of the reacting ion was linear, with the film thickness <5N chosen to give the actual concentration gradient at the electrode. In reality, however, the thin diffusion layer is not stagnant, and the fictitious t5N is always smaller than the real mass-transfer boundary-layer thickness (Fig. 2). However, since the actual concentration profile tapers off gradually to the bulk value of the concentration, the well-defined Nernst diffusion layer thickness has retained a certain convenience in practical calculations. [Pg.214]


See other pages where Boundary layers defined is mentioned: [Pg.523]    [Pg.523]    [Pg.556]    [Pg.523]    [Pg.523]    [Pg.556]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.478]    [Pg.2009]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.664]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.324]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.357 ]




SEARCH



Boundary layers functions, defined

Boundary, defined

Planetary boundary layer defined

© 2024 chempedia.info