Bonding electronic theory

Boron Monoxide and Dioxide. High temperature vapor phases of BO, B2O3, and BO2 have been the subject of a number of spectroscopic and mass spectrometric studies aimed at developiag theories of bonding, electronic stmctures, and thermochemical data (1,34). Values for the principal thermodynamic functions have been calculated and compiled for these gases (35). 

The apparent inertness of the noble gases gave them a key position in the electronic theories of valency as developed by G. N. Lewis (1916) and W. Kossel (1916) and the attainment of a stable octet was regarded as a prime criterion for bond formation between atoms (p. 21). Their monatomic, non-polar nature makes them the most nearly perfect gases known, and has led to continuous interest in their physical properties. 

For bonded atoms, the off-diagonal terms (where i j) are taken to depend on tjje type and length of the bond joining the atoms on which the basis functions y- and Xj 0 centred. The entire integral is written as a constant, 0ij, which is not the same as the fixY in Hiickel 7r-electron theory. The are taken to be parameters, fixed by calibration against experiment. It is usual to set Pij to zero when the pair of atoms are not formally bonded. 

There is an equivalent way of generating solutions to the electronic Schrodinger equation which conceptually is much closer to the experimentalists language, known as Valence Bond (VB) theory. We will start by illustrating the concepts for the H2 molecule, and note how it differ from MO methods. 

A number of reaction pathways have been proposed for the Fischer indolization reaction. The mechanism proposed by Robinson and Robinson in 1918, which was extended by Allen and Wilson in 1943 and interpreted in light of modem electronic theory by Carlin and Fischer in 1948 is now generally accepted. The mechanism consists of three stages (I) hydrazone-ene-hydrazine equilibrium (II) formation of the new C-C bond via a [3,3]-sigmatropic rearrangement (III) generation of the indole nucleus by loss of... 

The Lewis structures encountered in Chapter 2 are two-dimensional representations of the links between atoms—their connectivity—and except in the simplest cases do not depict the arrangement of atoms in space. The valence-shell electron-pair repulsion model (VSEPR model) extends Lewis s theory of bonding to account for molecular shapes by adding rules that account for bond angles. The model starts from the idea that because electrons repel one another, the shapes of simple molecules correspond to arrangements in which pairs of bonding electrons lie as far apart as possible. Specifically ... 

After the discovery of the electron many efforts were made to develop an electronic theory of the chemical bond. A great contribution was made in 1916 by Gilbert Newton Lewis, who proposed that the chemical bond, such as... 

It was pointed out in my 1949 paper (5) that resonance of electron-pair bonds among the bond positions gives energy bands similar to those obtained in the usual band theory by formation of Bloch functions of the atomic orbitals. There is no incompatibility between the two descriptions, which may be described as complementary. It is accordingly to be expected that the 0.72 metallic orbital per atom would make itself clearly visible in the band-theory calculations for the metals from Co to Ge, Rh to Sn, and Pt to Pb for example, the decrease in the number of bonding electrons from 4 for gray tin to 2.56 for white tin should result from these calculations. So far as I know, however, no such interpretation of the band-theory calculations has been reported. 

The effects of the bonding electrons upon the d electrons is addressed within the subjects we call crystal-field theory (CFT) or ligand-field theory (LFT). They are concerned with the J-electron properties that we observe in spectral and magnetic measurements. This subject will keep us busy for some while. We shall return to the effects of the d electrons on bonding much later, in Chapter 7. 

In all these discussions, we separate, as best we might, the effects of the d electrons upon the bonding electrons from the effects of the bonding electrons upon the d electrons. The latter takes us into crystal- and ligand-field theories, the former into the steric roles of d electrons and the geometries of transition-metal complexes. Both sides of the coin are relevant in the energetics of transition-metal chemistry, as is described in later chapters. 

One-electron pictures of molecular electronic structure continue to inform interpretations of structure and spectra. These models are the successors of qualitative valence theories that attempt to impose patterns on chemical data and to stimulate experimental tests of predictions. Therefore, in formulating a one-electron theory of chemical bonding, it is desirable to retain the following conceptual advantages. 

In the final section of this chapter, we shall attempt to give a brief rationalization of the regularities and peculiarities of the reactions of non-labile complexes which have been discussed in the previous sections. The theoretical framework in which the discussion will be conducted is that of molecular orbital theory (mot). The MOT is to be preferred to alternative approaches for it allows consideration of all of the semi-quantitative results of crystal field theory without sacrifice of interest in the bonding system in the complex. In this enterprise we note the apt remark d Kinetics is like medicine or linguistics, it is interesting, it js useful, but it is too early to expect to understand much of it . The electronic theory of reactivity remains in a fairly primitive state. However, theoretical considerations may not safely be ignored. They have proved a valuable stimulus to incisive experiment. 

It was G. N. Lewis who extended the definitions of acids and bases still further, the underlying concept being derived from the electronic theory of valence. It provided a much broader definition of acids and bases than that provided by the Lowry-Bronsted concept, as it furnished explanations not in terms of ionic reactions but in terms of bond formation. According to this theory, an acid is any species that is capable of accepting a pair of electrons to establish a coordinate bond, whilst a base is any species capable of donating a pair of electrons to form such a coordinate bond. A Lewis acid is an electron pair acceptor, while a Lewis base is an electron pair donor. These definitions of acids and bases fit the Lowry-Bronsted and Arrhenius theories, and cover many other substances which could not be classified as acids or bases in terms of proton transfer. 

Gas phase transition metal cluster chemistry lies along critical connecting paths between different fields of chemistry and physics. For example, from the physicist s point of view, studies of clusters as they grow into metals will present new tests of the theory of metals. Questions like How itinerant are the bonding electrons in these systems and Is there a metal to non-metal phase transition as a function of size are frequently addressed. On the other hand from a chemist point of view very similar questions are asked but using different terminology How localized is the surface chemical bond and What is the difference between surface chemistry and small cluster chemistry Cluster science is filling the void between these different perspectives with a new set of materials and measurements of physical and chemical properties. 

---