Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Bond angle solvent effects

Table III-52 indicates the kinetic data for quatemization of 2- and 4-alkylthiazoles. The 8 value shows that the 4-positioiH more sensitive than the 2-position to steric effects, the bond angle HjCjN (123°6) being greater than that of HjQN (119 4). This result has been confirmed for all solvents and leaving groups (256). Table III-52 indicates the kinetic data for quatemization of 2- and 4-alkylthiazoles. The 8 value shows that the 4-positioiH more sensitive than the 2-position to steric effects, the bond angle HjCjN (123°6) being greater than that of HjQN (119 4). This result has been confirmed for all solvents and leaving groups (256).
This kind of perfect flexibility means that C3 may lie anywhere on the surface of the sphere. According to the model, it is not even excluded from Cj. This model of a perfectly flexible chain is not a realistic representation of an actual polymer molecule. The latter is subject to fixed bond angles and experiences some degree of hindrance to rotation around bonds. We shall consider the effect of these constraints, as well as the effect of solvent-polymer interactions, after we explore the properties of the perfectly flexible chain. Even in this revised model, we shall not correct for the volume excluded by the polymer chain itself. [Pg.49]

Chloroform, CHCla, is an example of a polar molecule. It has the same bond angles as methane, CH4, and carbon tetrachloride, CCLi- Carbon, with sp3 bonding, forms four tetrahedrally oriented bonds (as in Figure 16-11). However, the cancellation of the electric dipoles of the four C—Cl bonds in CCL does not occur when one of the chlorine atoms is replaced by a hydrogen atom. There is, then, a molecular dipole remaining. The effects of such electric dipoles are important to chemists because they affect chemical properties. We shall examine one of these, solvent action. [Pg.312]

The dipole moment of tributylpliosphine varies from 1.49 to 2.4 D according to the solvent used. Inductive effects in phosphines have been estimated by comparing the calculated and observed dipole moments, and the apparent dipole moment due to the lone electron pair on phosphorus has been estimated. A method of calculating the hybridization of the phosphorus atom in terms of bond angles is suggested which leads to a linear relationship between hybridization ratio and lone electron pair moment. The difference between experimental and calculated dipole moments for para-substitued arylphosphines, phosphine sulphides, and phosphinimines has been used to estimate mesomeric transfer of electrons to phosphorus. [Pg.283]

A fourth solvent structural effect refers to the average properties of solvent molecules near the solute. These solvent molecules may have different bond lengths, bond angles, dipole moments, and polarizabilities than do bulk solvent molecules. For example, Wahlqvist [132] found a decrease in the magnitude of the dipole moment of water molecules near a hydrophobic wall from 2.8 D (in their model) to 2.55 D, and van Belle et al. [29] found a drop from 2.8 D to 2.6 D for first-hydration-shell water molecules around a methane molecule. [Pg.17]

From the table, we note that the experimental 19F shielding (43) is again reproduced only qualitatively. Solvent effects are expected to be important here as well. We note in this connection that the U-O-Me bond is tilted with an optimized bond angle of 135.5°, leading to calculated 19F shieldings that vary widely between the different fluorine sites, Table IV. [Pg.110]

Since czls-azoalkanes exhibit dipole moments of ca. (7... 10) 10 Cm (2... 3 D) [194], this solvent effect is best rationalized by assuming a decrease and final loss of the dipole moment during activation. Due to their dipole moments, czls-azoalkanes are more stabilized by polar solvents than the less dipolar activated complexes. The activation process corresponds to a synchronous, two-bond cleavage, probably accompanied by widening of the C—N=N bond angles [193]. A two-step, one-bond cleavage process via short-lived diazenyl radicals has been discussed [567], but this mechanism seems to be important only in the case of unsymmetrical azoalkanes, in particular arylazoalkanes [192]. [Pg.203]


See other pages where Bond angle solvent effects is mentioned: [Pg.596]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.631]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.330]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.704]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.1138]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.1138]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.607]    [Pg.603]    [Pg.631]    [Pg.729]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.731]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.461]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.312]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.7 ]




SEARCH



Angle Effects

SOLVENT BONDING

© 2024 chempedia.info