Bohr-Einstein debate

An important experiment carried out as recently as summer 1982 by the French physicist, Aspect, has unequivocally demonstrated the fact that physicists cannot get round the Uncertainty Principle and simultaneously determine the quantum states of particles, and confirmed that physicists cannot divorce the consciousness of the observer from the events observed. This experiment (in disproving the separabilty of quantum measurements) has confirmed what Einstein, Bohr and Heisenberg were only able to philosophically debate over - that with quantum theory we have to leave behind our naive picture of reality as an intricate clockwork. We are challenged by quantum theory to build new ways in which to picture reality, a physics, moreover, in which consciousness plays a central role, in which the observer is inextricably interwoven in the fabric of reality. 

To ensure that the heretical ideas of wave mechanics remain permanently suppressed it was necessary to show that matrix mechanics provided a complete and infallible description of the atomic world. The famous debates against Einstein were obviously conducted by Bohr to defend this position. It is generally agreed that Bohr prevailed in this confrontation, and his stance, no longer considered in dispute, was accepted as the orthodox interpretation of all quantum theory. 

A second debate about the completeness of quantum theory did not benefit theoretical chemistry any better. Superposition of state functions which is allowed in quantum, but not in classical systems, dictates that the former is an entangled, non-local holistic theory [3]. The famous Einstein-Bohr debates, although centred around this issue, became so bogged down in side issues that they never squarely faced the real dilemma that a non-local (quan-... 

Analysis of this state is interesting from the point of view of the quantum measurement problem, an issue that has been debated since the inception of quantum theory by Einstein, Bohr, and others, and continues today [31]. One practical approach toward resolving this controversy is the introduction of quantum decoherence, or the environmentally induced reduction of quantum superpoations into clasacal statistical mbrtures [32], Decoherence provides a way to quantify the elusive boundary between classical and quantum worlds, and almost always precludes the existence of macroscopic Schrodinger-cat states, except for extremely short times. On the othm hand, the creation of mesoscopic Schrddinger-cat states like that of q. (10) may allow controlled studies of quantum decoherence and the quantum-classical boundary. This problem is directly relevant to quantum computation, as we discuss below. 

Kumar M (2008) Quantum - Einstein, Bohr and the great debate about the nature of reality. 

While two-photon absorption spectroscopy has been widely applied for precision measurements of atomic structure, the polarization correlation of the simultaneous two-photon emission from the metastable Is state of atomic hydrogen has only been measured very recently. The emission of the coincident two photons can be described by a single state vector which determines the circular and linear two-photon polarization. Compared to the two-photon cascade experiments the polarization correlation of the simultaneous two-photon decay of metastable hydrogen is conceptually closer to the original proposals by Bell and Bohm for tests of the foundation of quantum mechanics. More than SO years have elapsed since the famous Einstein-Bohr debate on microphysical reality and quantum formalism. The present and future outcome of the hydrogen two-photon correlation experiment is considered to be a most crucial test with regard to the rivalry between quantum mechanics and local realistic theories. 

---