Quantum measurement problem

It is interesting to note that the Gottingen school, who later developed matrix mechanics, followed the mathematical route, while Schrodinger linked his wave mechanics to a physical picture. Despite their mathematical equivalence as Sturm-Liouville problems, the two approaches have never been reconciled. It will be argued that Schrodinger s physical model had no room for classical particles, as later assumed in the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics. Rather than contemplate the wave alternative the Copenhagen orthodoxy preferred to disperse their point particles in a probability density and to dress up their interpretation with the uncertainty principle and a quantum measurement problem to avoid any wave structure. 

Analysis of this state is interesting from the point of view of the quantum measurement problem, an issue that has been debated since the inception of quantum theory by Einstein, Bohr, and others, and continues today [31]. One practical approach toward resolving this controversy is the introduction of quantum decoherence, or the environmentally induced reduction of quantum superpoations into clasacal statistical mbrtures [32], Decoherence provides a way to quantify the elusive boundary between classical and quantum worlds, and almost always precludes the existence of macroscopic Schrodinger-cat states, except for extremely short times. On the othm hand, the creation of mesoscopic Schrddinger-cat states like that of q. (10) may allow controlled studies of quantum decoherence and the quantum-classical boundary. This problem is directly relevant to quantum computation, as we discuss below. 

The concept of quantum decoherence is often at the forefront of discussions on quantum communication and quantum information since it presents a serious obstacle to the extended use of many of the suggested future techniques. At the same time, this concept is a basic ingredient in our understanding of the quantum measurement problem and for the transition from a quantum to a classical description of the physical world. 

Srikanth, R. The quantum measurement problem and physical reality a computation theoretic perspective, quant-ph/0602114... 

The remarkable conclusion is that the microscopic quantum state, specified by the wave function ip, can be described on a macroscopic level by the probability distribution Pj. A single pure state corresponds to a macroscopic ensemble. The interference terms that are typical for quantum mechanics no longer appear. Incidentally, this resolves the paradox of Schrodinger s cat and, in general, the quantum mechanical measurement problem. )... 

However, it is not a good method to apply to typical Quantum-Chemistry problems. It woiks best for matrices which have small off-diagonal values and which have a small condition number. This last number is a measure of the spread of eigenvalues ... 

The elements of information summarized above are sufficient for our needs. We move on to examine the measurement problem from a perspective advanced in Refs. [4] and [5] and further developed here. Because the quantum evolution of probing and probe is entangled in Hilbert space and the events in real-space elicit results in measurements, this junction zone is a Fence. 

In the quantum-mechanical problem, E is the difference in energies between the lowest quantum states of A and A and hence is measured from the zero vibrational levels. 

Perhaps, the most important result in the field of quantum phase problem was obtained by Mandel et al. [47] within the framework of the operational approach. According to their analysis, there is no unique quantum phase variable, describing universally the measured phase properties of light. This very strong statement has obtained a totally convincing confirmation in a number of experiments [47,48]. The results of the operational approach can be interpreted with the aid of the method based on the special quasiprobability distribution functions [49]. 

At the time of our conversation, Pople was developing theories to include the density functional theory and he aimed to treat quantum mechanical problems more efficiently than before. He emphasized the importance of the possibility to make comparisons with experimental information. From this point of view, the density distribution of electrons is the same thing what X-ray diffraction provides, that is, the electron density distribution. In reality, when plots of the total electron density are calculated or measured the features of bonding (or the features of nonbonding electron pairs) are not directly discernable because the total electron density distribution suppresses the fine information related to them. There have been techniques that help us make the bonding features (as well as nonbonding electron... 

The subject of ultrafine particles (ufp) is perhaps currently the most challenging and interesting area in aerosol science. This subject entails the difficult area of nucleation processes to explain the origin of most ufp. Analysis of the evolution in size, composition, space and time of ufp involves one with current problems in statistical mechanics, kinetic theory, probability theory, quantum chemistry, etc. One also encounters very difficult measurement problems for ufp, although these will not be discussed here. 

In this unique book, many questions that arise beyond the standard streamlined presentation of quantum theory are addressed. The reader finds insightful essays on the emergence of classical physics from quantum physics and the decoherence mechanism, the measurement problem and the collapse of the wave function, and many other related subjects. 

The calculation of potential energy surfaces of interacting atoms is a complicated quantum-mechanical problem. It was solved for very simple systems only (see [132, 134, 241, 322, 413]). Consequently, along with the ab initio calculations there are may semiempirical methods based on theoretical correlations between readily measurable molecular parameters. Moreover, direct models of the potential surfaces are widely used [243]. 

Quantum mechanics is cast in a language that is not familiar to most students of chemistry who are examining the subject for the first time. Its mathematical content and how it relates to experimental measurements both require a great deal of effort to master. With these thoughts in mind, the authors have organized this introductory section in a manner that first provides the student with a brief introduction to the two primary constructs of quantum mechanics, operators and wavefunctions that obey a Schrodinger equation, then demonstrates the application of these constructs to several chemically relevant model problems, and finally returns to examine in more detail the conceptual structure of quantum mechanics. 

By learning the solutions of the Schrodinger equation for a few model systems, the student can better appreciate the treatment of the fundamental postulates of quantum mechanics as well as their relation to experimental measurement because the wavefunctions of the known model problems can be used to illustrate. 

Suppression of the tme diagonal peaks by double-quantum filtering (DQF-COSY) may resolve such problems. Finally, quantitative measurements of the magnitude of the coupling constants is possible using the Z-COSY modification, These experiments ate restricted to systems of abundant spins such as H, and which have reasonably narrow linewidths. 

Aside from merely calculational difficulties, the existence of a low-temperature rate-constant limit poses a conceptual problem. In fact, one may question the actual meaning of the rate constant at r = 0, when the TST conditions listed above are not fulfilled. If the potential has a double-well shape, then quantum mechanics predicts coherent oscillations of probability between the wells, rather than the exponential decay towards equilibrium. These oscillations are associated with tunneling splitting measured spectroscopically, not with a chemical conversion. Therefore, a simple one-dimensional system has no rate constant at T = 0, unless it is a metastable potential without a bound final state. In practice, however, there are exchange chemical reactions, characterized by symmetric, or nearly symmetric double-well potentials, in which the rate constant is measured. To account for this, one has to admit the existence of some external mechanism whose role is to destroy the phase coherence. It is here that the need to introduce a heat bath arises. 

By tradition, electrochemistry has been considered a branch of physical chemistry devoted to macroscopic models and theories. We measure macroscopic currents, electrodic potentials, consumed charges, conductivities, admittance, etc. All of these take place on a macroscopic scale and are the result of multiple molecular, atomic, or ionic events taking place at the electrode/electrolyte interface. Great efforts are being made by electrochemists to show that in a century where the most brilliant star of physical chemistry has been quantum chemistry, electrodes can be studied at an atomic level and elemental electron transfers measured.1 The problem is that elemental electrochemical steps and their kinetics and structural consequences cannot be extrapolated to macroscopic and industrial events without including the structure of the surface electrode. 

---