Block copolymers analytical techniques

It is important to recognize that the following analytical methods essentially determine EO-PO ratio ( H NMR, IR, cleavage methods) or even simply alkylene oxide content (compleximetric methods) of the analyte, and as such are not specific quantitative or qualitative methods for poloxamers, since EO-PO copolymers of a different structure (for instance, random copolymers, or PO-EO-PO block copolymers) may respond to the methods in a way indistinguishable from poloxamers. The principal technique that permits definitive identification of a sample as a poloxamer is C NMR, which allows structural details, such as the distribution of EO and PO units along the polymer chain, to be elucidated [10]. 

Explicitly developed are models of several theoretical multiphase distributions, with corresponding depth-profile results on thin-film plasma polymers, phase-separated block copolymers, and chemical reactions on fiber surfaces. Ion impact is treated from three points of view as an analytical fingerprint tool for polymer surface analysis via secondary ion mass spectroscopy, by forming unique thin films by introducing monomers into the plasma, and as a technique to modify polymer surface chemistry. 

Many analytical techniques are available for the determination of the primary molecular structure of a block copolymer and its average chemical composition. Among them spectroscopic techniques used for low molecular weight compounds are the most powerful and most widely employed. NMR can provide both qualitative and quantitative information with respect to comonomer composition and stereochemical configuration of polymeric molecules (136,137). The IR technique provides information on chemical, structural, and conformational aspects of polymeric chains (138). Because of the inherently high sensitivity of UV spectroscopy the technique is often utilized for the identification and quantitative determination of comonomers in block copolymers. 

Surface science. Surface characterization studies included those for base polyurethane segmented block copolymers and base polymer modified by <2 wt% U-P[AB], Surface analytical techniques included tapping mode atomic force microscopy (TM-AFM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), wetting behavior by dynamic contact angle (DCA) analysis and sessile drop measurements, and attenuated total reflectance infrared spectroscopy (ATR-IR). Contact antimicrobial behavior of U-P[AB] containing hydantoin and aikylammonium B side chains was determined by spray-on and sandwich tests previously described in detail elsewhere [11, 22, 38]. 

The difficulty results, in part, from the fact that only a small fraction of the chemical bonds, generally less than one in a thousand, are involved in me-chanochemical processes. The concentration of connecting units is therefore at the detection limit and below for traditional analytical methods such as conventional nuclear magnetic resonance and infrared spectroscopy. The sensitivity can, of course, be enhanced by techniques such as cumulative, multiple scans, Fourier transform analysis, and difference techniques for detection to one part in ten thousand and better. It may yet be difficult to determine whether polymers are linked by chemical bonds or whether they are simply intimate mixtures. For this distinction, other tests can be of value. For example, the difference between blocks and blends for ethylene-propylene polymer systems has been distinguished by thermal analysis [5]. In many cases, simple extraction tests can distinguish between copolymers and blends. For example, for rubber milled into polystyrene, the fraction of extractable rubber is a measure of mechanochemistry. Conversely, only the rubber in this system is readily cross-linked by benzoyl peroxide after which free polystyrene may be conveniently extracted [6]. In another case, homopolymers of styrene and methyl methacrylate can be separated cleanly from each other and from their copolymers by fractional precipitation [7]. The success of such processes, of course, depends on both the compositions and molecular weights involved. 

---