Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Basis sets applications

Basis Set [Applicable Atoms] Description Basis Fimctions 1st row hydrogen atoms atoms Default Function Types ... [Pg.102]

A planar molecule of point group 03b is shown in Fig. 5. The sigma orbitals i, <72 and (73 represented there will be taken as the basis set Application of the method developed in Section 8.9 yields the characters of the reducible representation given in Table 14. With the use of the magic formula (Eq. (37)] the structure of the reduced representation is of the form Ta — A, ... [Pg.319]

Dahle, P., Helgaker, T., Jonsson, D., Taylor, RR. Accurate quantum-chemical calculations using Gaussian-type geminal and Gaussian-type orbital basis sets applications to atoms and diatomics. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2007, 9, 3112-26. [Pg.147]

This significant m variability is reduced but does not disappear if we switch to the real spherical harmonics, which are arguably more important chemically, particularly in minimal-basis-set applications. In the context of chemistry we almost never use the complex spherical harmonics but rather their real and imaginary parts. The real spherical harmonics each have / nodal circles... [Pg.299]

Full ab initio optimizations of molecular geometries of enamines (and of any other kind of molecules) depend strongly on the kind of applied basis sets application of STO-3G 2 3, 3-21G 3-2lG 4-3lG 6-3lG 6-31G " and 6-31G basis sets leads to optimizations for the coplanar framework of all atoms of vinylamine, but it was not stated in these references whether coplanarity was assumed by input constraint or not. Contrary to that, the use of a double-zeta basis set with heavy atom polarization functions as well as 6-31 - -G ° based optimization yielded a non-planar amino group for 115. [Pg.25]

In order to determine the symmetry coordinates for the three stretching vibrations, we must apply the projection operator to one of the three basis functions in the Fg i basis set. Application of the projection operator for the A/ IRR on the fj basis function yields the SALC shown in Table 9.10. This SALC is shown in Figure 9.13(b). If the A projection operator had been applied to the r-i or basis function instead, the exact same SALC would have resulted. This will always be true for a nondegenerate IRR. The choice of the basis function in these cases is entirely irrelevant. [Pg.246]

The representation of trial fiinctions as linear combinations of fixed basis fiinctions is perhaps the most connnon approach used in variational calculations optimization of the coefficients is often said to be an application of tire linear variational principle. Altliough some very accurate work on small atoms (notably helium and lithium) has been based on complicated trial functions with several nonlinear parameters, attempts to extend tliese calculations to larger atoms and molecules quickly runs into fonnidable difficulties (not the least of which is how to choose the fomi of the trial fiinction). Basis set expansions like that given by equation (A1.1.113) are much simpler to design, and the procedures required to obtain the coefficients that minimize are all easily carried out by computers. [Pg.38]

Pisani [169] has used the density of states from periodic FIP (see B3.2.2.4) slab calculations to describe the host in which the cluster is embedded, where the applications have been primarily to ionic crystals such as LiE. The original calculation to derive the external Coulomb and exchange fields is usually done on a finite cluster and at a low level of ab initio theory (typically minimum basis set FIP, one electron only per atom treated explicitly). [Pg.2225]

The application of density functional theory to isolated, organic molecules is still in relative infancy compared with the use of Hartree-Fock methods. There continues to be a steady stream of publications designed to assess the performance of the various approaches to DFT. As we have discussed there is a plethora of ways in which density functional theory can be implemented with different functional forms for the basis set (Gaussians, Slater type orbitals, or numerical), different expressions for the exchange and correlation contributions within the local density approximation, different expressions for the gradient corrections and different ways to solve the Kohn-Sham equations to achieve self-consistency. This contrasts with the situation for Hartree-Fock calculations, wlrich mostly use one of a series of tried and tested Gaussian basis sets and where there is a substantial body of literature to help choose the most appropriate method for incorporating post-Hartree-Fock methods, should that be desired. [Pg.157]

Application of the variational self-consistent field method to the Haitiee-Fock equations with a linear combination of atomic orbitals leads to the Roothaan-Hall equation set published contemporaneously and independently by Roothaan and Hall in 1951. For a minimal basis set, there are as many matr ix elements as there are atoms, but there may be many more elements if the basis set is not minimal. [Pg.278]

In the first chapter, we described a model chemistry as an unbiased, uniquely defined, and uniformly applicable theoretical model for predicting the properties of chemical systems. A model chemistry generally consists of the combination of a theoretical method with a basis set. Each such unique pairing of method with basis set represents... [Pg.93]

In the next section we derive the Taylor expansion of the coupled cluster cubic response function in its frequency arguments and the equations for the required expansions of the cluster amplitude and Lagrangian multiplier responses. For the experimentally important isotropic averages 7, 7i and yx we give explicit expressions for the A and higher-order coefficients in terms of the coefficients of the Taylor series. In Sec. 4 we present an application of the developed approach to the second hyperpolarizability of the methane molecule. We test the convergence of the hyperpolarizabilities with respect to the order of the expansion and investigate the sensitivity of the coefficients to basis sets and correlation treatment. The results are compared with dispersion coefficients derived by least square fits to experimental hyperpolarizability data or to pointwise calculated hyperpolarizabilities of other ab inito studies. [Pg.114]


See other pages where Basis sets applications is mentioned: [Pg.25]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.2184]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.409]    [Pg.438]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.592]    [Pg.312]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.395]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.457]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.134]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.485 , Pg.486 , Pg.487 , Pg.488 , Pg.489 , Pg.490 ]




SEARCH



Examples of 4-Component Basis Sets in Applications

Set...Application

© 2024 chempedia.info