Basis functions energy

Rank changes also occur at higher J-values when level crossings occur. When the energy of the basis function, Z7inin, overtakes the 1E basis function energy, from below (because Bin > Bi- - ), the energy rank of the... 

The perturbations of the SiO A1 state are summarized in Fig. 5.7. The J-values where the A1 and perturber basis function energies become equal are marked using a different symbol for each type of electronic perturber. This not necessarily integer J-value is called the culmination of the perturbation and is easily recognized because ... 

In order to confirm this conjecture we need to know the actual relationship between the , and the MO coefficients and the basis-function energy integrals. The most direct way to obtain an expression for (and hence a physical interpretation) of the fj is from the Hartree-Fock equation for each column of C in the orthonormal basis ... 

When approximated or modelled, this potential is certain to be more complex than the simple Slater exchange potential Xa, LDA, LSD) and therefore will generate basis-function energy integrals... 

Now we can calculate the ground-state energy of H2. Here, we only use one basis function, the Is atomic orbital of hydrogen. By symmetry consideration, we know that the wave function of the H2 ground state is... 

Employing simplifications arising from the use of asymptotic forms of the electronic basis functions and the zeroth-order kinetic energy operator, we obtain... 

A convenience of electronic basis functions (53) is that they reduce at infinitesimal-amplitude bending to (28) with the same meaning of the angle 9 we may employ these asymptotic forms in the computation of the matrix elements of the kinetic energy operator and in this way avoid the necessity of carrying out calculations of the derivatives of the electronic wave functions with respect to the nuclear coordinates. The electronic part of the Hamiltonian is represented in the basis (53) by... 

The present perturbative beatment is carried out in the framework of the minimal model we defined above. All effects that do not cincially influence the vibronic and fine (spin-orbit) stracture of spectra are neglected. The kinetic energy operator for infinitesimal vibrations [Eq. (49)] is employed and the bending potential curves are represented by the lowest order (quadratic) polynomial expansions in the bending coordinates. The spin-orbit operator is taken in the phenomenological form [Eq. (16)]. We employ as basis functions... 

The zeroth-order energy level is twofold degenerate. The corresponding vibronic basis functions are ur K+2 0 0 —) = 11) and luj- A"—2 0 0 +) = 2). The first-order energy correction is... 

In other cases, the zeroth-order vibronic levels are generally more than twofold degenerate and the perturbative handling is much more complicated. An exception is the case 07= , U( =li K = 0 with the twofold degenerate zeroth-order level. The basis functions are 1 1 1 1 —) = 1) and 1 —1 1 —l- -)s 2). The zeroth-order energy is... 

Ihe one-electron orbitals are commonly called basis functions and often correspond to he atomic orbitals. We will label the basis functions with the Greek letters n, v, A and a. n the case of Equation (2.144) there are K basis functions and we should therefore xpect to derive a total of K molecular orbitals (although not all of these will necessarily 3e occupied by electrons). The smallest number of basis functions for a molecular system vill be that which can just accommodate all the electrons in the molecule. More sophisti- ated calculations use more basis functions than a minimal set. At the Hartree-Fock limit he energy of the system can be reduced no further by the addition of any more basis unctions however, it may be possible to lower the energy below the Hartree-Fock limit ay using a functional form of the wavefunction that is more extensive than the single Slater determinant. 

The core contributions thus require the calculation of integrals that involve basis functions on up to two centres (depending upon whether 0, and 0 are centred on the same nucleus or not). Each element H)) can in turn be obtained as the sum of a kinetic energy Integra and a potential energy integral corresponding to the two terms in the one-electror HcUniltonian. 

A Hbasis functions provides K molecular orbitals, but lUJiW of these will not be occupied by smy electrons they are the virtual spin orbitals. If u c were to add an electron to one of these virtual orbitals then this should provide a means of calculating the electron affinity of the system. Electron affinities predicted by Konpman s theorem are always positive when Hartree-Fock calculations are used, because fhe irtucil orbitals always have a positive energy. However, it is observed experimentally that many neutral molecules will accept an electron to form a stable anion and so have negative electron affinities. This can be understood if one realises that electron correlation uDiild be expected to add to the error due to the frozen orbital approximation, rather ihan to counteract it as for ionisation potentials. 

The optimization procedure is canied out to find the set of coefficients of the eigenvector that minimizes the energy. These are the best coefficients for the chosen linear combination of basis functions, best in the sense that the linear combination of arbitrarily chosen basis functions with optimized coefficients best approximates the molecular orbital (eigenvector) sought. Usually, some members of the basis set of funetions bear a eloser resemblanee to the true moleeular orbital than others. If basis function a +i. 

Corrections to the MP4/6-311G(d,b) Energy. Higher-level basis functions, if they are prudently chosen, should be better than lower-level functions. Thus the energy of, for example, a diffuse function, [MP2/6-311 - - G(d,p)] should be lower (more negative) than the same function in which diffuse electron density is not taken into account [MP2/6-31 lG(d,p)], provided that the levels of elecUon... 

The second approximation in HF calculations is due to the fact that the wave function must be described by some mathematical function, which is known exactly for only a few one-electron systems. The functions used most often are linear combinations of Gaussian-type orbitals exp(—nr ), abbreviated GTO. The wave function is formed from linear combinations of atomic orbitals or, stated more correctly, from linear combinations of basis functions. Because of this approximation, most HF calculations give a computed energy greater than the Hartree-Fock limit. The exact set of basis functions used is often specified by an abbreviation, such as STO—3G or 6—311++g. Basis sets are discussed further in Chapters 10 and 28. 

In this formulation, the electron density is expressed as a linear combination of basis functions similar in mathematical form to HF orbitals. A determinant is then formed from these functions, called Kohn-Sham orbitals. It is the electron density from this determinant of orbitals that is used to compute the energy. This procedure is necessary because Fermion systems can only have electron densities that arise from an antisymmetric wave function. There has been some debate over the interpretation of Kohn-Sham orbitals. It is certain that they are not mathematically equivalent to either HF orbitals or natural orbitals from correlated calculations. However, Kohn-Sham orbitals do describe the behavior of electrons in a molecule, just as the other orbitals mentioned do. DFT orbital eigenvalues do not match the energies obtained from photoelectron spectroscopy experiments as well as HF orbital energies do. The questions still being debated are how to assign similarities and how to physically interpret the differences. 

Likewise, a basis set can be improved by uncontracting some of the outer basis function primitives (individual GTO orbitals). This will always lower the total energy slightly. It will improve the accuracy of chemical predictions if the primitives being uncontracted are those describing the wave function in the middle of a chemical bond. The distance from the nucleus at which a basis function has the most significant effect on the wave function is the distance at which there is a peak in the radial distribution function for that GTO primitive. The formula for a normalized radial GTO primitive in atomic units is... 

---