Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Axial detector

Such is not the case if, instead of the axial detector, we employ the annular dark-field detector for which P la 1, where P is the effective angle subtended by the detector. Under these circumstances we anticipate that phase contrast will not contribute significantly to the image. Instead, modulation of the amplitude-contrast transfer function should be noted in an image if, for example, a probe of FWHM comparable to atomic separations is scanned across a sharp edge or a periodic structure. This is observed in Figure 8, in which a probe of FWHM 3 A is scanned across... [Pg.90]

We now return to Eqs. (87) and (88) to analyze the annular and central detector configuration. For a small axial detector, we see immediately that... [Pg.28]

Equation (2) is true in the case where there is no instrumental spreading, that is, where all particles present in the detector cell are of exactly the same diameter. Because of axial dispersion, and skewing caused by entrapment or adsorption, corrections for instrumental spreading are required. In this case x v) is described by ... [Pg.29]

Interpretation of copolymer chromatograms in the literature does not include axial dispersion correction (3, 6) and little is known regarding it (5). The usual approach( is to utilize dual detectors and to assume that both detectors respond to at mos both composition and concentration. The two chromatograms then provide two equations in these two unknowns at each retention time. [Pg.165]

Figure 6. Schematic outline of the first commercially available multiple collector ICPMS, the Plasma 54, after Halhday et al. (1995). This instrument uses Nier-Johnson double-focusing and is equipped with eight independently adjustable Faraday collectors. The axial collector can be wound down to provide access to a Daly detector equipped with ion counting capabilities and a second-stage energy filter for high abundance sensitivity measurements. The sample may be introduced to the plasma source by either solution aspiration or laser ablation. Figure 6. Schematic outline of the first commercially available multiple collector ICPMS, the Plasma 54, after Halhday et al. (1995). This instrument uses Nier-Johnson double-focusing and is equipped with eight independently adjustable Faraday collectors. The axial collector can be wound down to provide access to a Daly detector equipped with ion counting capabilities and a second-stage energy filter for high abundance sensitivity measurements. The sample may be introduced to the plasma source by either solution aspiration or laser ablation.
Thorium. Multiple-collector measurement protocols by TIMS for thorium isotopic analysis typically involve the simultaneous measurement of Th and °Th (for silicate rocks), or Th and °Th, then Th and Th (for low- Th samples), using an axial ion counter and off-axis Faraday collector (Table 1). Various methods are used to correct for the relative gain between the low-level and Faraday detectors and 2a-uncertainties of l-5%o are typically obtained (Palacz et al. 1992 Cohen et al. 1992 McDermott et al. 1993 Rubin 2001). Charge-collection TIMS protocols enable Th, °Th and Th to be monitored simultaneously on a multiple-Faraday array and can achieve measurement uncertainties at the sub-permil level (Esat et al. 1995 Stirling et al. 1995). [Pg.48]

The worst operating condition in a common design practice consists of overly conservative assumptions on the hot-channel input. These assumptions must be realistically evaluated in a subchannel analysis by the help of in-core instrumentation measurements. In the early subchannel analysis codes, the core inlet flow conditions and the axial power distribution were preselected off-line, and the most conservative values were used as inputs to the code calculations. In more recent, improved codes, the operating margin is calculated on-line, and the hot-channel power distributions are calculated by using ex-core neutron detector signals for core control. Thus the state parameters (e.g., core power, core inlet temper-... [Pg.431]

Fig. 2.4p shows three types of post-column reactor. In the open tubular reactor, after the solutes have been separated on the column, reagent is pumped into the column effluent via a suitable mixing tee. The reactor, which may be a coil of stainless steel or ptfe tube, provides the desired holdup time for the reaction. Finally, the combined streams are passed through the detector. This type of reactor is commonly used in cases where the derivatisation reaction is fairly fast. For slower reactions, segmented stream tubular reactors can be used. With this type, gas bubbles are introduced into the stream at fixed time intervals. The object of this is to reduce axial diffusion of solute zones, and thus to reduce extra-column dispersion. For intermediate reactions, packed bed reactors have been used, in which the reactor may be a column packed with small glass beads. [Pg.78]

Figure 2.4 Schematic diagram of an ICP torch. The sample is carried into the torch by the carrier argon gas, and is ignited by radio-frequency heating from the RF coils. The tangential argon flow lifts the flame from the burner, preventing melting. The position of the detector in axial or radial mode is shown. (From Pollard et al., 2007 Fig. 3-3, by permission of Cambridge University Press.)... Figure 2.4 Schematic diagram of an ICP torch. The sample is carried into the torch by the carrier argon gas, and is ignited by radio-frequency heating from the RF coils. The tangential argon flow lifts the flame from the burner, preventing melting. The position of the detector in axial or radial mode is shown. (From Pollard et al., 2007 Fig. 3-3, by permission of Cambridge University Press.)...
Figure 1 Diagrams showing the essential electron-optical configurations used for various imaging modes in CTEM and STEM as seen by two points A and B on the sample, (a) CTEM axial bright field, (b) CTEM tilted dark field, (c) CTEM hollow cone dark field, and (d) STEM with bright field and annular dark field detectors. Figure 1 Diagrams showing the essential electron-optical configurations used for various imaging modes in CTEM and STEM as seen by two points A and B on the sample, (a) CTEM axial bright field, (b) CTEM tilted dark field, (c) CTEM hollow cone dark field, and (d) STEM with bright field and annular dark field detectors.

See other pages where Axial detector is mentioned: [Pg.30]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.610]    [Pg.616]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.610]    [Pg.616]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.526]    [Pg.546]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.546]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.957]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.337]    [Pg.350]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.439]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.432]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.364]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.60]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.59 , Pg.60 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info