Automated Optimization with HPLC Sampling

Both the simplex and steepest descent optimizations began at 70 °C and 180 s. From there, the simplex method moved toward conditions at higher temperature and lower residence time. Upon reaching the minimum residence time constraint, the simplex contracted, ultimately becoming a one-dimensional search until it reached the optimiun of 99 °C and 30 s near the corner of the design space after 30 experiments. The SNOBFIT algorithm initially performed a randomized, space-fining 

Method Number of set points Total time (h) Optimum  

Knoevenagel example with different Steepest descent method. Source Reprinted 

---

There are several software and automated systems for HPLC method development and optimization, such as Drylab , Chromsword , and ACD/AutoChrom MDS, and others (43 7). Their principles can be applied to UHPLC. In addition. Waters Corp. (Milford, MA) has recently promoted Fusion Method Development software. Fusion Method Development software from S-Matrix integrates seamlessly with Water s ACQUITY UPLC and Empower 2 Chromatography software to automate method development. The software automatically generates instrument methods and sample sets. Another feature of this software is to visualize data by statistically fitting the results. However, it cannot generate simulated chromatograms at predicted conditions, like Drylab can. 

Sample preparation, injection, calibration, and data collection, must be automated for process analysis. Methods used for flow injection analysis (FLA) are also useful for reliable sampling for process LC systems.1 Dynamic dilution is a technique that is used extensively in FIA.13 In this technique, sample from a loop or slot of a valve is diluted as it is transferred to a HPLC injection valve for analysis. As the diluted sample plug passes through the HPLC valve it is switched and the sample is injected onto the HPLC column for separation. The sample transfer time typically is determined with a refractive index detector and valve switching, which can be controlled by an integrator or computer. The transfer time is very reproducible. Calibration is typically done by external standardization using normalization by response factor. Internal standardization has also been used. To detect upsets or for process optimization, absolute numbers are not always needed. An alternative to... 

The development of a chromatographic procedure for an unknown sample (mixture) requires the selection of a variety of experimental conditions (type and composition of the mobile phase, characteristics of the column and the stationary phase, temperature, flow-rate, pressure, type of gradient, etc.). This problem was traditionally solved in an empirical way and with the aid of the vast literature on similar situations already dealt with. The last few years have seen attempts at the rationalization and automation of the optimization of chromatographic processes which have resulted In Interesting systematic approaches of great use. The monographs by Berridge [56], devoted to HPLC, and that by Shoenmakers [57], which deals with both HPLC and GC, represent the most systematic and complete compilations in this field at present. 

---