Atomic weight basic particles

Interestingly, the teachings of Democritus (460-37Ibc) did not become so important, although in the sense of natural science (as we now know it), they were much more relevant. Leucippus was Democritus s teacher, and thus the scholar took over the basic ideas of atomic theory from his teacher atoms as tiny particles, too tiny to be visible, which were everlasting and could not be destroyed. They were supposedly made from the same material, but were of different sizes and weights. According to Democritus, life arises from a process in which the small particles of the moist earth combine with the atoms of fire. 

A firm grasp of the basic ideas of division of matter is important for the understanding of physical sciences. These basic ideas presented here are not only used in chemistry and physics, but in many diverse fields such as medicine, engineering, astronomy, geology, and so on. In this chapter, we will discuss ideas about atoms and molecules, and related aspects such as moles, Avogadro number, percentage composition, atomic mass, atomic weight, and subatomic particles. 

A pioneer of thermochemistry, Julius Thomsen was first and foremost an experimentalist. Yet he also had an interest in chemical theories, and he was the only Danish scientist who, until Bohr in 1913, actively examined and contributed to the understanding of the periodic system. As mentioned, ever since the 1860s he entertained the heterodox view that the atoms of chemistry are complex particles and that this is revealed by regularities in their atomic weights. Of course, he was far from the only neo-Proutean of his time, but he was one of the most distinguished and articulate advocates of the idea of a basic unity of matter. In a work of 1887 he connected for the first time this idea with the periodic system, undoubtedly inspired by an address that William Crookes (1832-1919) had given the year before to the British Association for the Advancement of Science.Another likely inspiration was the British astronomer Joseph Norman Lockyer (1836-1920), whose work on the cosmic evolution of the elements had a great deal of similarity with the views expounded by Thomsen. 

To return to Thomsen, in a memoir of 1894 published by the Royal Danish Academy of Sciences, he offered a detailed examination of the atomic weights and their significance. His purpose was to establish that they, if only properly interpreted, revealed that the so-called atoms of our elements have evolved out of combination of particles of a common basic substance. He did not on this occasion discuss the relation to the periodic system, but this is what he did the following year, in a paper in which he proposed a new classification of the elements (Figure 8.1). From a formal point of view, Thomsen s innovation was merely to reverse periods and groups, which was not entirely original since versions of this kind had been proposed earlier, first by Thomas Bayley in 1882 and again by Carnelley in 1886. ° However, in 1894 Thomsen was unaware of these two systems, such as he stated in a letter to the American chemist Francis Venable (1856-1934), who in a book of 1896 described Thomsen s system in some detail. ... 

The whole-number ratios of combining weights in chemical reactions can be readily explained knowing that the basic unit of all elements is the atom, which originally meant an indivisible particle. Therefore, one atom of carbon can react with either one atom of oxygen. 

It is not possible to state the absolute mass or weight of any material object. At the most fundamental level, one can only state that a hydrogen atom has the mass of a single proton and a single electron it is impossible to know the absolute masses of those subatomic particles. This basic relationship, however, provides the means whereby other atoms can be... 

---