Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Atomic structure quantum mechanical description

The density of He I at the boiling point at 1 atm is 125 kg m 3 and the viscosity is 3 x 10 6 Pa s. As we would anticipate, cooling increases the viscosity until He II is formed. Cooling this form reduces the viscosity so that close to 0 K a liquid with zero viscosity is produced. The vibrational motion of the helium atoms is about the same or a little larger than the mean interatomic spacing and the flow properties cannot be considered in classical terms. Only a quantum mechanical description is satisfactory. We can consider this condition to give the limit of De-+ 0 because we have difficulty in defining a relaxation when we have the positional uncertainty for the structural components. [Pg.80]

An understanding of the structure of molecules requires a proper quantum mechanical description of the covalent bond that cannot be captured by the use of central pair potentials. We therefore extend our linear combination of atomic orbitals (LCAO) treatment of the s-valent dimer to three-, four-, five-, and six-atom molecules respectively. Following eqs (3.46) and (4.17), we write the binding energy per atom for an. -atom molecule as... [Pg.85]

GENERAL CHEMISTRY, Linus Pauling. Revised 3rd edition of classic first-year text by Nobel laureate. Atomic and molecular structure, quantum mechanics, statistical mechanics, thermodynamics correlated with descriptive chemistry. Problems. 992pp. 54 x 84. 65622-5 Pa. 18.95... [Pg.125]

Although there are many ways to describe a zeolite system, models are based either on classical mechanics, quantum mechanics, or a mixture of classical and quantum mechanics. Classical models employ parameterized interatomic potentials, so-called force fields, to describe the energies and forces acting in a system. Classical models have been shownto be able to describe accurately the structure and dynamics of zeolites, and they have also been employed to study aspects of adsorption in zeolites, including the interaction between adsorbates and the zeolite framework, adsorption sites, and diffusion of adsorbates. The forming and breaking of bonds, however, cannot be studied with classical models. In studies on zeolite-catalyzed chemical reactions, therefore, a quantum mechanical description is typically employed where the electronic structure of the atoms in the system is taken into account explicitly. [Pg.140]

The goal of this chapter is to describe the structure and properties of atoms using quantum mechanics. We couple the physical insight into the atom developed in Sections 3.2, 3.3, and 3.4 with the quantum methods of Chapter 4 to develop a quantitative description of atomic structure. [Pg.170]

With these approximations, the electronic structure can be treated using a relativistic quantum mechanical description, while the nuclei are held fixed. To overcome this clamped-nuclei approximation, an attempt has been made (Parpia et al. 1992b) to include relativistic corrected nuclear motion terms and to reach an adiabatic separation of the electronic and nuclear motion at least for atoms. [Pg.63]

The s and p orbitals used in the quantum mechanical description of the carbon atom, given in Section 1.10, were based on calculations for hydrogen atoms. These simple s and p orbitals do not, when taken alone, provide a satisfactory model for the tetravalent— tetrahedral carbon of methane (CH4, see Practice Problem 1.22). However, a satisfactory model of methane s structure that is based on quantum mechanics can be obtained through an approach called orbital hybridization. Orbital hybridization, in its simplest terms, is nothing more than a mathematical approach that involves the combining of individual wave functions for r and p orbitals to obtain wave functions for new orbitals. The new orbitals have, in varying proportions, the properties of the original orbitals taken separately. These new orbitals are called hybrid atomic orbitals. [Pg.32]

We showed in Section 2.2 how the structure of the periodic table arises from a quantum-mechanical description of the electronic structure of elements in terms of atomic orbitals. However, the origin of the periodic table predates the development of quantum... [Pg.143]

An interesting approach to the quantum mechanical description of many-electron systems such as atoms, molecules, and solids is based on the idea that it should be possible to find a quantum theory that refers solely to observable quantities. Instead of relying on a wave function, such a theory should be based on the electron density. In this section, we introduce the basic concepts of this density functional theory (DFT) from fundamental relativistic principles. The equations that need to be solved within DFT are similar in structure to the SCF one-electron equations. For this reason, the focus here is on selected conceptual issues of relativistic DFT. From a practical and algorithmic point of view, most contemporary DFT variants can be considered as an improved model compared to the Hartree-Fock method, which is the reason why this section is very brief on solution and implementation aspects for the underlying one-electron equations. For elaborate accounts on nonrelativistic DFT that also address the many formal difficulties arising in the context of DFT, we therefore refer the reader to excellent monographs devoted to the subject [383-385]. [Pg.313]

This does not mean that the core electrons are unimportant in atomic, molecular and solid state physics. They determine the actual states and energies of the valence electrons. Thus, in a quantum mechanical description of the electronic structure of atoms, solids or molecules, these core electrons have to be included in the hamiltonian. Consider e.g. an atom of charge Za.e, with M electrons. The hamiltonian then contains a sum of M kinetic terms, M attractive terms between the nucleus and the electrons, and M(Af —1)/2 terms for the Coulomb repulsion of the electrons ... [Pg.45]

If the effects calculated there should grasp the known chemical facts in Uieir nature—and not merely as the result of lengthy calculations— we wish to find the concepts of chemistry in the quantum-mechanical description and establish a connection with the structure of atoms. In chemistry these have proven to be reliable even in complicated cases, as a guide through the plethora of possible compounds. We especially want to interpret the valence numbers of the homo-polar compoimds on the basis of the conceptual framework of quantum-mechanics, in a fashion similar to the one in which the polar valence numbers have been interpreted fruitfully, though not in all cases fully satisfactorily, with the pictures of Kossel ind Lewis. [Pg.156]

For the calculation of properties at the atomic scale, ab initio or first-principles approaches, based on a quantum mechanical description of the interactions between electrons and atomic nuclei with the atomic numbers and masses as only input, have the advantage of a wider range of applicability with respect to e.g., different chemical environments of the atomic nuclei compared to empirical methods, at the price of higher computational complexity. The ab initio calculation of the electronic ground state structure within density functional theory [3] in the Kohn-Sham scheme [4] has become a standard approach to study bulk crystal structures, surfaces, and molecular reactions. [Pg.500]

H, He+, Li +, Be T and so on, are one-electron atoms. Each consists of only two particles, a nucleus and an electron. The quantum mechanical description of one-electron atoms is the starting point for understanding the electronic structure of atoms and of molecules. It is a problem that can be solved analytically, and it is useful to work through the details. In the case of the hydrogen atom, the nuclear mass is about 2000 times that of an electron. Thus, the proton would be expected to make small excursions about the mass center relative to any excursions of the very light electron. That is, we expect the electron to be "moving quickly" about, and in effect, orbiting the nucleus. [Pg.291]

The second large class of computational methods that is most useful for predicting reactivity of zeolites is based on the quantum mechanical description of a chemical system. Quantum mechanics represents the highest level in the hierarchy of computational methods. By solving the electronic structure problem they provide us the energy and wave function of a system, from which all properties of all atoms in it can be derived. In practice, however, the exact solution of the electronic structure problem cannot be obtained for any realistic system. [Pg.113]


See other pages where Atomic structure quantum mechanical description is mentioned: [Pg.103]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.383]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.447]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.446]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.372]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.104]   


SEARCH



Atomic Mechanisms

Atomic structure, quantum mechanics

Atomization description

Atomization mechanism

Atoms description

Atoms quantum mechanics

Mechanical structure

Mechanism, description

Quantum mechanical atom

Quantum mechanical descriptions

Quantum mechanics structures

Quantum structure

Structural description

Structural mechanic

Structural mechanism

Structures description

© 2024 chempedia.info