Atomic orbitals observation

In Chapter 7, we used valence bond theory to explain bonding in molecules. It accounts, at least qualitatively, for the stability of the covalent bond in terms of the overlap of atomic orbitals. By invoking hybridization, valence bond theory can account for the molecular geometries predicted by electron-pair repulsion. Where Lewis structures are inadequate, as in S02, the concept of resonance allows us to explain the observed properties. 

Among the diatomic molecules of the second period elements are three familiar ones, N2,02, and F2. The molecules Li2, B2, and C2 are less common but have been observed and studied in the gas phase. In contrast, the molecules Be2 and Ne2 are either highly unstable or nonexistent. Let us see what molecular orbital theory predicts about the structure and stability of these molecules. We start by considering how the atomic orbitals containing the valence electrons (2s and 2p) are used to form molecular orbitals. 

This was a claim that I and several other authors criticized in a number of journals, but unfortunately not in Nature magazine.11 Although the authors of the Orbitals Observed study protested their innocence, it became clear that their claims had been incorrect and exaggerated.12 In a section of the same paper, I discussed the notion that the 4s atomic orbital is occupied before the 3d orbitals. This has subsequently turned out to be incorrect and there is conclusive spectroscopic evidence to the contrary which seemed to have escaped the attention of several authors who have written on this issue, including myself.13... 

In addition most of the more tractable approaches in density functional theory also involve a return to the use of atomic orbitals in carrying out quantum mechanical calculations since there is no known means of directly obtaining the functional that captures electron density exactly. The work almost invariably falls back on using basis sets of atomic orbitals which means that conceptually we are back to square one and that the promise of density functional methods to work with observable electron density, has not materialized. 

This is why I and some others have been agitating about the recent reports, starting in Nature magazine in September 1999, that atomic orbitals had been directly observed. This is simply impossible unless one is using the word "orbital" rather perversely to mean charge density (Scerri, 2000). 

In molecular applications the calculation of the HF energy is a still more difficult problem. It should be observed that, in the SCF-MO-LCAO now commonly in use, one does not determine the exact HF functions but only the best approximation to these functions obtainable within the framework given by the ordinarily occupied AO s. Since the set of these atomic orbitals is usually very far from being complete, the approximation may come out rather poor, and the correlation energy estimated from such a calculation may then turn out to be much too large in absolute order of magnitude. The best calculation so far is perhaps Coulson s treatment of... 

In Fig. 1 there is indicated the division of the nine outer orbitals into these two classes. It is assumed that electrons occupying orbitals of the first class (weak interatomic interactions) in an atom tend to remain unpaired (Hund s rule of maximum multiplicity), and that electrons occupying orbitals of the second class pair with similar electrons of adjacent atoms. Let us call these orbitals atomic orbitals and bond orbitals, respectively. In copper all of the atomic orbitals are occupied by pairs. In nickel, with ou = 0.61, there are 0.61 unpaired electrons in atomic orbitals, and in cobalt 1.71. (The deviation from unity of the difference between the values for cobalt and nickel may be the result of experimental error in the cobalt value, which is uncertain because of the magnetic hardness of this element.) This indicates that the energy diagram of Fig. 1 does not change very much from metal to metal. Substantiation of this is provided by the values of cra for copper-nickel alloys,12 which decrease linearly with mole fraction of copper from mole fraction 0.6 of copper, and by the related values for zinc-nickel and other alloys.13 The value a a = 2.61 would accordingly be expected for iron, if there were 2.61 or more d orbitals in the atomic orbital class. We conclude from the observed value [Pg.347]

In order to explain the observed saturation ferromagnetic moment of Fe, 2.22/xb, I assumed that the Fe atom in the metal has two kinds of 3d orbitals 2.22 atomic (contracted) orbitals, and 2.78 bonding 3d orbitals, which can hybridize with 4s and 4p to form bond orbitals. Thus 2.22 of the 8 outer electrons could occupy the atomic orbitals to provide the ferromagnetic moment, with the other 5.78 outer electrons forming 5.78 covalent bonds. 

The experimentally observed quadrupole splitting AEq for Fe in inorganic compounds, metals, and solids reaches from 0 to more than 6 mm s [30, 32]. The range of AEq for other Mossbauer isotopes may be completely different because of the different nuclear quadrupole moment Q of the respective Mossbauer nucleus, and also because the EFG values may be intrinsically different due to markedly different radial distributions of the atomic orbitals (vide infra). As Q is constant for a given isotope, variations in the quadrupole coupling constants eQV can only arise from... 

Thus, the calculations show that the outer ns(np) atomic orbitals can play a significant role in the formation of M-M bonds in transition metal acido-clusters. The probability that these atomic orbitals will participate in the formation of M-M bonds is maximal for elements of Group 7, particularly, for technetium, in whose clusters Zeff for technetium atoms is the lowest of those observed in all known acido-clusters. 

Gardner 45) has observed the spectrum of Cl atoms adsorbed on a silica-gel surface at 77°K. The experimental results indicate that the orbital degeneracy of the 3p atomic orbital has been removed as a result of the electrostatic interaction with the surface. From the occupancy of the atomic orbitals one would predict that gx >011 — 2.00 and indeed the experimental g values are = 2.012 with g = 2.003. The hyperfine coupling indicates that the impaired electron is highly localized in the 3p orbitals. 

The hydrogen atom migration observed on thermolysis of is reminiscent of 1,2-hydrogen atom migrations in carbene chemistry (45,46,47). The stereochemistry of such processes is now relatively well-understood and involves initial hyperconjugative interaction between a gauche C-H bond and the carbene unoccupied p atomic orbital, followed by a low activation energy 1,2 shift (eq.(6)) ( 7,48,49,50). 

In outer parts of benzene rings containing three non-joint atoms, one observes localized orbitals of type 7t 2 as well as as of type jt 3 and in some instances intermediate types. This is illustrated in Fig. 20 (see p. 102/103) where, in the upper left hand comer, pyrene exemplifies a pure ir 3-type orbital. As we go to the right in the first row and then into the second row, we see orbitals on similar three atom branches which become more and more asymmetric and finally are of type jt 2. Proceeding through the second row into the third row, we have again a transition to type 7r 3, but now one of the three atoms is a joint atom. 

---