Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Atomic Energy Commission

DOD (C.V.), CHENG (C.C.), SIMPSON (W.A.), DEEDA (D.A.), SMITH (J.H.), The analysis of reflection type coils for eddy current testing, DAK Ridge Normal Laboratory, US atomic energy commission. [Pg.296]

For several years, the French Atomic Energy Commission (CEA) has developed modelling tools for ultrasonic NDT configurations. Implemented within the CIVA software for multiple technique NDT data acquisition and processing [1,2], these models are not only devoted to laboratory uses but also dedicated to ultrasonic operators without special training in simulation techniques. This approach has led us to develop approximate models carrying out the compromise between as accurate as possible quantitative predictions and simplicity, speed and intensive use in an industrial context. [Pg.735]

D. H. Slade, ed.. Meteorology and Atomic Pnergy 1968, U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, July 1968 available as TlD-24190, Cleatinghouse for Eederal Scientific and Technical Information National Bureau of Standards, U.S. Department of Commerce, Sptingfteld, Va. [Pg.414]

R. J. Ring and D. Royston, d Repiew of Fluorine Cells and Fluorine Production Facilities, Austrahan Atomic Energy Commission, AAEC/E 281 /, Sept. 1973. [Pg.133]

R. F. Smith, U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, F4jFA-SR-52S6 1960. [Pg.162]

I. G. Ryss, The Chemistry of Fluorine and Its Inorganic Compounds., State Publishing House for Scientific and Technical Literature, Moscow, 1956 Engl. transL by E. Haimson for the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission,HEC-/r-i5 27, Washington, D.C., 1960, p. 812. [Pg.209]

R. N. Lyon, ed., TiquidMetals Handbook, Atomic Energy Commission and Department of the Navy, Washington, D.C., 1952. [Pg.510]

R. L. Matliews, Pxplosion and Detonation Pimits for an Oyygen-Djdrogen-Water l apor Sjstem, U.S. Atomic Energy Commission KAPL-M-6564, Cleariaghouse for Eedeial Scientific and Technical Information, Washington, D.C., 1966, 54 pp. [Pg.434]

Whereas new appHcations of lithium compounds were developed, commercial growth was slow. In 1953 worldwide sales of lithium products, expressed as lithium carbonate, were only ca 1000 metric tons (2). In 1954 the U.S. lithium industry underwent a sudden, very large expansion when the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission required large amounts of lithium hydroxide [1310-65-2] for its nuclear weapons program (see Nuclearreactors). Three domestic producers built 4500-t/yr plants to meet contract commitments with the U.S. government. When these government contracts ended in 1960, capacity exceeded demand and several operations were discontinued. [Pg.220]

A technique called probabiUstic safety assessment (PSA) has been developed to analy2e complex systems and to aid in assuring safe nuclear power plant operation. PSA, which had its origin in a project sponsored by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, is a formali2ed identification of potential events and consequences lea ding to an estimate of risk of accident. Discovery of weaknesses in the plant allows for corrective action. [Pg.181]

G. M. Murphy, H. C. Urey, and I. Kirshenbaum, eds.. Commercial Production of Heavy Water, National Nuclear Enef Series, Div. Ill, Vol. 4E, U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Technical Information Service, Oak Ridge, Term., 1951 (declassified 1960). [Pg.199]

Safety Evaluation of the Midwest Fuel Recovey Plant, General Electric Co., Docket No. 50-268, United States Atomic Energy Commission, Washington,... [Pg.208]

J. L. Woolfrey, Preparation and Caldnation of Ammonium Uranates—-A Eiterature Survey, AEC/TM-476, AustraUm Atomic Energy Commission, Lucas Heights, Austraha, Sept. 1968. [Pg.208]

The results of design studies, calculations, and experiments for the reactor types selected for investigation in the post-Wodd War II period were collected in the multivolume proceedings of several international conferences at Geneva (24). The U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEG) sponsored the pubhcation of individual books between 1958 and 1964 describing the status of several reactor types (9,18,33—36). [Pg.212]

Comparative Risk-Cost-Benefit Study of Alternative Sources of Electrical Energy, Report WASH-1224, U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, Washington, D.C., Dec. 1974 Nucl Sa 17(2), 171 (1976). [Pg.246]


See other pages where Atomic Energy Commission is mentioned: [Pg.171]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.919]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.429]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.207]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.2 , Pg.13 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.8 , Pg.49 , Pg.54 , Pg.57 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.126 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.83 , Pg.110 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.243 , Pg.245 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.119 , Pg.185 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.70 , Pg.73 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.151 , Pg.159 , Pg.481 , Pg.485 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.67 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.35 , Pg.37 , Pg.47 , Pg.50 , Pg.51 , Pg.53 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.2 , Pg.3 , Pg.4 , Pg.86 , Pg.112 , Pg.193 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.2 , Pg.3 , Pg.4 , Pg.86 , Pg.112 , Pg.193 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.5 , Pg.35 , Pg.65 , Pg.68 , Pg.270 , Pg.274 , Pg.275 , Pg.276 , Pg.279 , Pg.294 , Pg.306 , Pg.321 , Pg.324 , Pg.327 , Pg.332 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.51 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.52 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.3 , Pg.8 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.3 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.15 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.15 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.525 , Pg.637 , Pg.656 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.114 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.73 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.133 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.105 ]




SEARCH



Atomic Energy Commission Bibliographies

Atomic Energy Commission Reactor

Atomic Energy Commission Reports

Atomic Energy Commission programs

Atomic Energy Commission, example

French Atomic Energy Commission

General Medical Sciences-Atomic Energy Commission

Japan Atomic Energy Commission

Korea Atomic Energy Commission

Korea Atomic Energy Commission KAEC)

U.S. Atomic Energy Commission

US Atomic Energy Commission

United States Atomic Energy Commission

United States Atomic Energy Commission USAEC)

WASH-740 report, Atomic Energy Commission

© 2024 chempedia.info