Associative mechanism lead-ligand interactions

For an X—Y substrate, activation in this manner can ultimately lead to cleavage of the X—Y bond in a process called oxidative addition (5, 6, 16). The metal complex center has undergone an increase in both coordination number and oxidation state since in this formalism the electron pairs in metal-ligand bonds are associated with the ligands (14, 15). While substrate activation by oxidative addition occurs in this way for H2 (16), the term oxidative addition really represents a stoichiometric transformation, and does not necessarily imply a specific mechanism. In fact, studies over the past decade have shown that the interaction of X—Y with a metal center to give X—M—Y proceeds by any of a variety of mechanisms determined by the substrate and the metal complex (16-18). However, once the X—M—Y species is formed, the X—Y substrate can be viewed as activated. 

The tris(mercaptoimidazolyl) ligand TmAr has been employed to emulate the coordination environment of 5-aminolevulinate dehydratase (ALAD). Several ZnX(TmAr) have been described145-147 that also have helped in the knowledge of the mechanism of action of ALAD. To study the lead poisoning that is associated with lead interaction with ALAD, PbX(TmAr) complexes have been also reported.148... 

It was soon recognized that in specific cases of asymmetric synthesis the relation between the ee of a chiral auxiliary and the ee of the product can deviate from linearity [17,18,72 - 74]. These so-called nonlinear effects (NLE) in asymmetric synthesis, in which the achievable eeprod becomes higher than the eeaux> represent chiral amplification while the opposite case represents chiral depletion. A variety of NLE have been found in asymmetric syntheses involving the interaction between organometallic compounds and chiral ligands to form enantioselective catalysts [74]. NLE reflect the complexity of the reaction mechanism involved and are usually caused by the association between chiral molecules during the course of the reaction. This leads to the formation of diastereoisomeric species (e.g., homochiral and heterochiral dimers) with possibly different relative quantities due to distinct kinetics of formation and thermodynamic stabilities, and also because of different catalytic activities. 

A second variation of saturation transfer experiment has been devised by Dalvit and coworkers that uses the transfer of magnetization from the water (167). Water is intimately associated with proteins being bound either within or on the surface of the macromolecu-lar structure. Saturation of the water resonance will lead to protein saturation through a variety of mechanisms, including saturation of the aH resonances, saturation of exchanging protein resonances, and NOE interactions between water and the protein. If a compound is bound to the protein it will also become saturated, and this effect can be used as an indication of ligand binding (167). 

An examination of the photolysis of trans-[Cr(NH3)4(H20)(NCS)Hg], produced from trtms-[Cr(NH3)4(H20)(NCS)f (1) by interaction with Mg, and of (1) itself, has shown that only cis-[Cr(NH3)4(H20)2] is formed. Emission activation energies have been determined for [Cr(NH3)5CN] and trans-[Cr(NH3)4(CN)2p and ligand field irradiation of cis-[Cr(NH3)4(CN)2] in acid solution leads to aquation of NH3 and CN in a process whose quantum yields are wavelength dependent. The product [Cr(NH3)3(H20)(CN)2] consists of a mixture of l,2-CN-3-H20 and l,2-CN-6-H20, the composition of which is determined by the ligand-field band excited. A E state is thought to be involved, and either a dissociative (symmetry restricted) or associative (edge displacement) mechanism operates. ... 

The theoretical origin of these difficulties is not hard to understand. The role of configuration interaction as a source of two-electron crystal-field effects was pointed out in 1964 (Rajnak and Wyboume, 1964). The parametrization of two-electron crystal-field interactions in terms of general two-electron operators was discussed (Bishton and Newman, 1970). Other mechanisms involving polarization of the ligands by transient electrostatic fields of the electrons associated with the lanthanide ion (Judd, 1976 Morrison, 1980) lead to two-electron operators of the same form as that given by Bishton and Newman. 

---