Assay balances

First order a good and accurate Cologne or Niirnberg assay balance with a long beam which is adapted and proper to lift the silver button (Korn). Take care that you lift nothing heavy with it, for by that the balance will be lamed and [weigh] false. 

An assay balance in parts, from Lazarus Ercker, Beschreibung... 

An "assay balance of careful construction" of the type used by Lavoisier before 1788. This balance became the production model that served as a general, all-purpose balance for approximately 40 years. Users of this type of balance Included Sir Humphrey Davy and his young assistant Michael Faraday. 

In current industrial practice gas chromatographic analysis (glc) is used for quahty control. The impurities, mainly a small amount of water (by Kad-Fischer) and some organic trace constituents (by glc), are deterrnined quantitatively, and the balance to 100% is taken as the acetone content. Compliance to specified ranges of individual impurities can also be assured by this analysis. The gas chromatographic method is accurately correlated to any other tests specified for the assay of acetone in the product. Contract specification tests are performed on product to be shipped. Typical wet methods for the deterrnination of acetone are acidimetry (49), titration of the Hberated hydrochloric acid after treating the acetone with hydroxylamine hydrochloride and iodimetry (50), titrating the excess of iodine after treating the acetone with iodine and base (iodoform reaction). 

A total material balance assay is a Fischer assay in which the retort gases are collected. A complete material balance closure and yields in excess of those expected from Fischer assay results are achieved. More complete descriptions of both the Fischer assay and the Tosco material balance assay methods have been reported (9). 

Figure 4.42. Trend analysis over 46 batches of a bulk chemical produced according to the same manufacturing procedure Small and scaled-up batch size [kg], HPLC and Titration assays [%], resp. individual HPLC impurity levels [%], versus batch number. The lack of full correlation between assays indicates that the titration is insensitive to some impurities detected by HPLC. The mass balance, where available, suggests that all relevant impurities are quantified. Impurities B and C, for instance, are highly correlated (r = 0.884, p = 0.0002).

Assessment and definition of sensitivity are often described for quantitative analysis but are of equal importance for qualitative devices of the dip-stick type that are very popular for farm- or field-based screening assays. Because of the somewhat subjective nature of visually assessed assays, the assay s sensitivity must be validated using a number of observers to determine at what level a test is deemed positive. The number of false positives and false negatives must be carefully determined in order to balance consumer safety and potential economic loss to animal producers. 

The methylxanthines can be determined in foods and biological systems by the chromatographic methods of TLC, GC, HPLC, or CE. Ultraviolet spectroscopy following a separation procedure can also be used. More recently, immunoassay methods have been developed. There is no single best method the analyst must balance the features of each assay with the final requirements for data precision and reproducibility. 

The discussion above was concerned with the effects of solution conditions on enzyme activity, hence reaction velocity. Equally important for the purpose of assay design is the influence of specific solution conditions on the detection method being used. This latter topic is beyond the scope of the present text. Nevertheless, this is an important issue for screening scientists whose job is often to balance the needs of biochemical rigor and assay practicality in development of an HTS assay. An... 

We saw in Chapter 3 that bisubstrate reactions can conform to a number of different reaction mechanisms. We saw further that the apparent value of a substrate Km (KT) can vary with the degree of saturation of the other substrate of the reaction, in different ways depending on the mechanistic details. Hence the determination of balanced conditions for screening of an enzyme that catalyzes a bisubstrate reaction will require a prior knowledge of reaction mechanism. This places a necessary, but often overlooked, burden on the scientist to determine the reaction mechanism of the enzyme before finalizing assay conditions for HTS purposes. The importance of this mechanistic information cannot be overstated. We have already seen, in the examples of methotrexate inhibition of dihydrofolate, mycophenolic acid inhibiton of IMP dehydrogenase, and epristeride inhibition of steroid 5a-reductase (Chapter 3), how the [5]/A p ratio can influence one s ability to identify uncompetitive inhibitors of bisubstrate reactions. We have also seen that our ability to discover uncompetitive inhibitors of such reactions must be balanced with our ability to discover competitive inhibitors as well. 

---