Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Aromatization, relative effects

As has been pointed out in the past (e.g. concerning the linear-cyclic equilibrium in Ceand Cio carbon clusters (40)), Hartree-Fock underestimates the resonance stabilization of aromatic relative to non-aromatic systems (in the case at hand, between the N- and / -protonated isomers) and MP2 overcorrects. The structures are found to be nearly isoenergetic at the CCSD level inclusion of connected triple excitations favors the N-protonated ion. The direction of the effect of connected quadruples is somewhat unclear, and a CCSD(TQ) or CCSDT(Q) calculation impossible on systems this size, but the contribution will anyhow be much smaller in absolute magnitude than that of connected triple excitations, particularly for systems like these which are dominated by a single reference determinant. We may therefore infer that at the full Cl limit, the N-protonated species will be slightly more stable than its / -protonated counterpart. [Pg.188]

Gas-phase basicities of several substituted benzaldehydes (62 X = o-/m-/p-Me/F, o-j 77 -Cl) have been measured, relative to benzaldehyde or mesitylene as reference bases, over a range of temperatures.101 The tolualdehydes are more basic than benzaldehyde, the halobenzaldehydes less so, following classical aromatic substituent effects. The data also correlate well with solution-based linear-free-energy substituent constants, as well as with theoretical (MNDO) calculations. Some deviations are noteworthy (i) the o-halobenzaldehydes (especially chloro) have higher basicities than predicted, but calculations tend to rale out the hydrogen-bonded isomer (63), which is also contraindicated by a normal A,S value, inconsistent with the expected restriction of— hOH rotation in such a structure (ii) anomalies in the high-temperature behaviour of m-fluorobenzaldehyde in the presence of mesitylene reference base are consistent with a specific catalysed isomerization to the ortho- or para-isomer. [Pg.18]

The relative effects of supercitical carbon dioxide density, temperature, extraction cell dimensions (I.D. Length), and cell dead volume on the supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) recoveries of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and methoxychlor from octadecyl sorbents are quantitatively compared. Recoveries correlate directly with the fluid density at constant temperature whereas, the logarithms of the recoveries correlate with the inverse of the extraction temperature at constant density. Decreasing the extraction vessels internal diameter to length ratio and the incorporation of dead volume in the extraction vessel also resulted in increases in SFE recoveries for the system studied. Gas and supercritical fluid chromatographic data proved to be useful predictors of achievable SFE recoveries, but correlations are dependent on SFE experimental variables, including the cell dimensions and dead volume. [Pg.240]

The lower barrier in phospholes relative to the acyclic phosphines is attributed to stabilization in the planar transition state. This stabilization is assigned to cyclic (3p-2p)7r delocalization in P and (4p-2p)7r de-localization for arsenic. The increased barrier upon annelation in the phosphorus system may be attributed to a disruption of the phosphole aromaticity. Similar effects have been noted in indoles. [Pg.245]

The influence of molecular structures and substituents on the antiozonant properties of a series of related aromatic diamine compounds was studied. The relative effectiveness of the compounds was determined by viscometric techniques and by comparison of the rate of degradation of protected vuicanizates. Results indicate that unsymmetrical p-phenylenediamine derivatives are less effective than analogous symmetrical compounds as antiozonants. The protective capacity of the antiozonants decreases as the size or number of the N-hydrogen substituents, or the distance between the amine groups, increases. The comparative stability of the free radicals of aryl diamines, in terms of the theory of resonance, is utilized to explain the relative inhibiting properties of the chemicals examined. [Pg.176]

Some interesting secondary solvent effects have been noted for adsorption of the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and certain of their derivatives on alumina 14). The more nearly linear isomers (e.g., anthracene relative to phenanthrene, 2-bromonaphthalene relative to 1-bromonaph-thalene) are preferentially adsorbed from most solvents, owing to the apparent weak localization of these compounds on linear site complexes see Section 11-2B, There is also a tendency for the preferential adsorption of strong solvent molecules on these same linear site complexes, with the result that strong solvents (or their solutions in weaker solvents) behave as selectively stronger solvents toward the preferentially adsorbed linear aromatics, relative to less linear isomers. As a consequence the ratio of values for two such isomers varies sharply with the solvent used, despite the fact that Eq. (8-3) predicts that this ratio should remain constant for all solvents i.e., A. is generally constant for two or more isomers. Jn extreme cases the ratio of K" values for two isomers of this type can be varied by a factor of 10 or more, depending upon the solvent used (see Table 11-4). [Pg.117]

In the 1930s Hammett formulated the equation named in his honor. It is based on the observation of the constancy of the relative effects of substituents on aromatic rings, regardless of the reaction rate or equilibrium of interest. This relationship is expressed according to equation (3.3). [Pg.62]

The correlation of selectivity with hyperconjugation has been made many times in the past, and is the basis of the recent attempt of Knowles et al. (179) at a parametric separation of the polarization and polarizability effects of alkyl substituents. Still, the simple induction-hyperconjugation balance interpretation of secondary isotope effects—or of the relative effects of methyl vs. terf-butyl—in aromatic substitution does not hold up well under scrutiny ... [Pg.211]

The solubility of a compound is thus affected by many factors the state of the solute, the relative aromatic and aliphatic degree of the molecules, the size and shape of the molecules, the polarity of the molecule, steric effects, and the ability of some groups to participate in hydrogen bonding. In order to predict solubility accurately, all these factors correlated with solubility should be represented numerically by descriptors derived from the structure of the molecule or from experimental observations. [Pg.495]

The relative basicities of aromatic hydrocarbons, as represented by the equilibrium constants for their protonation in mixtures of hydrogen fluoride and boron trifluoride, have been measured. The effects of substituents upon these basicities resemble their effects upon the rates of electrophilic substitutions a linear relationship exists between the logarithms of the relative basicities and the logarithms of the relative rate constants for various substitutions, such as chlorination and... [Pg.113]

Excluding the phenomenon of hyperconjugation, the only other means by which electronic effects can be transmitted within saturated molecules, or exerted by inductive substituents in aromatic molecules, is by direct electrostatic interaction, the direct field effect. In early discussions of substitution this was usually neglected for qualitative purposes since it would operate in the same direction (though it would be expected to diminish in the order ortho > meta > para) as the cr-inductive effect and assessment of the relative importance of each is difficult however, the field effect was recognised as having quantitative significance. ... [Pg.126]

These relative rate data per position are experimentally determined and are known as partial rate factors They offer a convenient way to express substituent effects m elec trophilic aromatic substitution reactions... [Pg.491]


See other pages where Aromatization, relative effects is mentioned: [Pg.206]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.504]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.480]    [Pg.387]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.527]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.428]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.1446]    [Pg.1448]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.530]    [Pg.982]    [Pg.557]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.141]   


SEARCH



Relative aromaticity

© 2024 chempedia.info