Arbitrary nomenclature

Quite naturally there is a certain amount of arbitrariness in this system, although the lUPAC nomenclature is followed. The preferred Chemical Abstracts index names for chemical substances have been, with very few exceptions, continued unchanged (since 1972) as set forth in the Ninth Collective Index Guide and in a journal article. Any revisions appear in the updated Index Guide new editions appear at 18-month intervals. Appendix VI is of particular interest to chemists. Reprints of the Appendix may be purchased from Chemical Abstracts Service, Marketing Division, P.O. Box 3012, Columbus, Ohio 43210. 

Thiamine is present in cells as the free form 1, as the diphosphate 2, and as the diphosphate of the hydroxyethyl derivative 3 (Scheme 1) in variable ratio. The component heterocyclic moieties, 4-amino-5-hydroxymethyl-2-methylpyrimidine (4) and 4-methyl-5-(2-hydroxyethyl)thiazole (5) are also presented in Scheme 1, with the atom numbering. This numbering follows the rules of nomenclature of heterocyclic compounds for the ring atoms, and is arbitrary for the substituents. To avoid the use of acronyms, compound 5 is termed as the thiazole of thiamine or more simply the thiazole. This does not raise any ambiguity because unsubstituted thiazole is encountered in this chapter. Other thiazoles are named after the rules of heterocyclic nomenclature. Pyrimidine 4 is called pyramine, a well established name in the field. A detailed account of the present status of knowledge on the biosynthesis of thiamine diphosphate from its heterocyclic moieties can be found in a review by the authors.1 This report provides only the minimal information necessary for understanding the main part of this chapter (Scheme 2). 

Since many of the developments in modern liquid chromatography are of recent origin the nomenclature commonly used is less standardized than that of gas chromatography [188]. Wc have Mde an arbitrary selection of the terms we prefer to use in this book along with some other common alternatives in Table 1.13. 

Figure 9.2 Magnetic entropy versus temperature for a hypothetical paramagnet at two distinct magnetic fields. Hf represents the final field and the initial, although this nomenclature is arbitrary and there is...

The nomenclature of zeolites is rather arbitrary and follows no obvious rules because every producer of synthetic zeolites uses his/her own acronyms for the materials. However, as mentioned before, at least the structure types of the different zeolites have a unique code. For example, FAU represents Faujasite-type zeolites, LTA Linde Type A zeolites, MFI Mobile Five, and BEA Zeolite Beta. The structure commission of the International Zeolite Association (IZA) is the committee granting the respective three-letter codes [4], Some typical zeolites, which are of importance as catalysts in petrochemistry, will be described in the following sections. 

Similarly to homopolymers, source-based nomenclature has been applied to copolymers [4]. The principal problem is to define the kind of arrangement in which various types of monomeric units are related to each other. Seven types of separate arrangements have been defined, which are shown in Table 1, where A, B and C represent the names of monomers. The monomer names are linked either through an italicized qualifier or connective (infix), such as -CO- , to form the name of the copolymer, as in poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile). The order of citation of the monomers is arbitrary. 

The terms diarylethenes, dithienylethenes, and dihetarylethenes, as applied to the structures of photochromic products II, of course, do not strictly meet the nomenclature requirements. However, these terms have gained wide acceptance in the special literature. The classification of compounds containing heterocycles as bridges is also rather arbitrary. 

Specialists in nomenclature recognise two different categories of nomenclature. Names that are arbitrary (including the names of the elements, such as sodium and hydrogen) as well as laboratory shorthand names (such as diphos and LithAl) are termed trivial names. This is not a pejorative or dismissive term. Trivial nomenclature contrasts with systematic nomenclature, which is an assembly of rules, themselves arbitrary. The function of specialists in nomenclature is to codify such rules so that everyone can use them to identify pure substances, rather like many of us use an alphabet to represent words. There may be more than one way to name a compound or species, and no one way may be superior to all the others. Names also vary in complexity, depending upon how much information needs to be conveyed. For example, a compositional name conveys less information than a structural (or constitutional) name, because this includes information about the arrangement of atoms in space. 

It is generally an arbitrary matter to decide where to apply substitutive nomenclature in these cases. Table 5.1 shows the elements to which both CNIC and CNOC approve the application. Table 5.2 gives the names of the corresponding mononuclear parent hydrides. The only additional elements to which substitutive nomenclature may sometimes be applied are the halogens, particularly iodine. 

For this review, heterophanes are considered to contain one or more heteroaromatic ring(s) bridged by a non-aromatic chain of atoms. Although a certain arbitrariness identifies (1) but not (2), as a heterophane, this definition focuses attention on the chemistry appropriate for this review and makes the volume of literature to be reviewed more manageable. Different nomenclature approaches for heterophanes have been proposed (70T5847,72T5183, 72TL2109) as alternatives for the currently accepted, complex IUPAC or Chemical Abstracts names, which actually obscure the phane structural element in these compounds. A proposal... 

However, if we take the CH4 molecule apart stepwise, we get four different results that we may call the bond dissociation energies D (the nomenclature is arbitrary) ... 

At temperatures above 250°C, the olefin-forming reactions are irreversible but the transformations in the first line of Scheme 3 are reversible. Thus, starting with an arbitrary amine, all other derivatives are obtained by these reactions, called disproportionations, transalkylations or dismutations (the nomenclature is also inconsistent in that the analoguous formation of ethers from alcohols is named dehydration). 

Area. II. We have previously designated the /th representation, or its set of characters, by the symbol T, in a fairly arbitrary way. Although this practice is still to be found in some places and is common in older literature, most books and papers—in fact, virtually all those by English-speaking authors— now use the kind of symbols found in the C3v table above and all tables in Appendix II. This nomenclature was proposed by R. S. Mulliken, and the symbols are normally called Mulliken symbols. Their meanings are as follows ... 

In conventional organic nomenclature, a polymer is not considered to be an isomer of the repeating molecular unit, because the molecular formulas formally differ. This is a somewhat arbitrary distinction, however, because it is never really an isolated, single molecule of monomer that is compared with the polymer. In an aggregate of monomer molecules, intermolecular forces exist and the constitutional difference from an aggregate of polymer molecules is simply that some intermolecular forces have been converted into true chemical bonds. In any case, the term polymerization isomerism has had a long-standing use in coordination chemistry. It may refer... 

The present discussion of isomerism in coordination compounds is not, nor was it intended to be, comprehensive and exhaustive. The examples considered are an eclectic selection, and many important systems may have been neglected through ignorance. An obvious omission is any detailed consideration of polynuclear complexes139,256"259 and it is, of course, a quite arbitrary decision not to include any consideration of organometallic species. Other neglected issues, such as the development of a truly comprehensive system of stereochemical nomenclature, are perhaps not yet capable of solution. Nevertheless, it is to be hoped that the principal factors to be considered... 

One indicator is that the transformation leads to a change in tariff classification. This sometimes leads to arbitrary results because different parts of the tariff nomenclature have different levels of detail. 

It was proposed admittedly as a compromise suggestion which might be acceptable to both the nomenclaturists and the terpene chemists. To avoid indefinite extension of terpene-type names to allied compounds no longer classed as terpenes, which is undesirable from the overall nomenclature viewpoint, and in an attempt to resolve the troublesome problem of where to cut off the use of the names based on trivial names and substitute the systematic names, the arbitrary addition of only one or two carbon atoms to a parent carbon skeleton was proposed. Such practice is not usual procedure in organic nomenclature. 

Proposal HI is one of those arbitrary conceptions that makes nomenclature practice so difficult for those who are not in the expert bracket. Adherence to a few simple rules may lead to synonyms, but creation of arbitrary little "principles is objectionable because of the arbitrariness involved. 

The R and S nomenclature was first presented in 1951 by Cahn and Ingold [26], and then consolidated and extended by Cahn, Ingold and Prelog [27,28]. The essential part of this nomenclature (also called the CIP nomenclature) of chiral centers is the sequence rule, i.e., a set of arbitrary but consistent rules which allow a hierarchical assignment of the substituents (a > b > c > d). 

---