Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Second derivative approximations

The Hessian that results from a geometry optimization was built up in steps from one geometry to the next, approximating second derivatives from the changes in gradients (Eq. 2.15). This Hessian is not accurate enough for the calculation of... [Pg.35]

If the reaction path is not obvious, then the most general techniques require information about the second derivatives. There exist, however, several often successful techniques that do not require this. The MOPAC and AMPAC series of programs utilize, for example, the saddlepoint technique, which attempts to approach the transition state from the reactant and product geometry simultaneously. The ZINDO set of models can utilize a combination of augmented Hessian and analytic geometry techniques. This is a very effective method, but unfortunately the augmented Hessian method does require approximate second derivatives and is somewhat time consuming. [Pg.357]

Each data set falls on a line and the slopes of each of these lines are identical The slopes are the approximate second derivative of the change in level with time. From the graph we can... [Pg.119]

We can approximate second derivatives similarly by adding the expansions,... [Pg.263]

A different approach comes from the idea, first suggested by Flelgaker et al. [77], of approximating the PES at each point by a harmonic model. Integration within an area where this model is appropriate, termed the trust radius, is then trivial. Normal coordinates, Q, are defined by diagonalization of the mass-weighted Flessian (second-derivative) matrix, so if... [Pg.266]

The Morse oscillator model is often used to go beyond the harmonic oscillator approximation. In this model, the potential Ej(R) is expressed in terms of the bond dissociation energy Dg and a parameter a related to the second derivative k of Ej(R) at Rg k = ( d2Ej/dR2) = 2a2Dg as follows ... [Pg.69]

Another method for finding the end point is to plot the first or second derivative of the titration curve. The slope of a titration curve reaches its maximum value at the inflection point. The first derivative of a titration curve, therefore, shows a separate peak for each end point. The first derivative is approximated as ApH/AV, where ApH is the change in pH between successive additions of titrant. For example, the initial point in the first derivative titration curve for the data in Table 9.5 is... [Pg.291]

The second derivative of a titration curve may be more useful than the first derivative, since the end point is indicated by its intersection with the volume axis. The second derivative is approximated as A(ApH/AV)/AV, or A pH/AV. For the titration data in Table 9.5, the initial point in the second derivative titration curve is... [Pg.292]

There are several reasons that Newton-Raphson minimization is rarely used in mac-romolecular studies. First, the highly nonquadratic macromolecular energy surface, which is characterized by a multitude of local minima, is unsuitable for the Newton-Raphson method. In such cases it is inefficient, at times even pathological, in behavior. It is, however, sometimes used to complete the minimization of a structure that was already minimized by another method. In such cases it is assumed that the starting point is close enough to the real minimum to justify the quadratic approximation. Second, the need to recalculate the Hessian matrix at every iteration makes this algorithm computationally expensive. Third, it is necessary to invert the second derivative matrix at every step, a difficult task for large systems. [Pg.81]

In the region of the right-hand inflection point both the k° and k" terms can often be neglected. The second derivative d k/dpH is then set to zero. As a first approximation all terms higher than the linear one are neglected ... [Pg.290]

There are some systems for which the default optimization procedure may not succeed on its own. A common problem with many difficult cases is that the force constants estimated by the optimization procedure differ substantially from the actual values. By default, a geometry optimization starts with an initial guess for the second derivative matrix derived from a simple valence force field. The approximate matrix is improved at each step of the optimization using the computed first derivatives. [Pg.47]

The most frequently used methods fall between the Newton method and the steepest descents method. These methods avoid direct calculation of the Hessian (the matrix of second derivatives) instead they start with an approximate Hessian and update it at every iteration. [Pg.238]

The second derivative of the energy with respect to the number of electrons is the hardness r) (the inverse quantity is called the softness), which again may be approximated in term of the ionization potential and electron affinity. [Pg.353]

A reader familiar with the first edition will be able to see that the second derives from it. The objective of this edition remains the same to present those aspects of chemical kinetics that will aid scientists who are interested in characterizing the mechanisms of chemical reactions. The additions and changes have been quite substantial. The differences lie in the extent and thoroughness of the treatments given, the expansion to include new reaction schemes, the more detailed treatment of complex kinetic schemes, the analysis of steady-state and other approximations, the study of reaction intermediates, and the introduction of numerical solutions for complex patterns. [Pg.293]

The mutual correspondence of non-Markovian and Markovian (impact) approximations becomes clear, if the second derivative of K/(t) is considered. It varies differently within three time intervals with the following bounds xc < xj < Tj1 (Fig. 2.5). Orientational relaxation occurs in times Fj1. The gap near zero has a scale of xj. A parabolic vertex of extent xc and curvature I4 > 0 is inscribed into its acute end. The narrower the vertex, the larger is its curvature, thus, in the impact approximation (tc = 0) it is equal to 00. In reality xc =j= 0, and the... [Pg.78]

The second derivative is constant (independent of a) for this second-order approximation. We consider it to be a central difference. ... [Pg.312]

Following Chan (2. ) a difference approximation Is used to compute the second derivatives of G. A Newton Iteration Is then applied to the equation... [Pg.361]

Note that Eq. (37) also enters into a sine discrete Fourier transform approximation of the second derivative. [Pg.15]

Strict requirement and can be theoretically met only if we know the underlying continuous function that provides the values of the derivatives at the time points of a discrete representation. The availability, though, of such a continuous function is based on a series of ad hoc decisions on the character and properties of the functions, and if one prefers to avoid them, then one must accept a series of approximations for the evaluation of first and second derivatives. These approximations provide a sequence of representations with increasing abstraction, leading, ultimately, to qualitative descriptions of the state and trend as follows (Cheung and Stephanopoulos, 1990) ... [Pg.219]


See other pages where Second derivative approximations is mentioned: [Pg.2341]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.2341]    [Pg.696]    [Pg.425]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.2341]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.2341]    [Pg.696]    [Pg.425]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.2334]    [Pg.2349]    [Pg.2525]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.625]    [Pg.765]    [Pg.486]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.361]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.29]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.43 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.50 ]




SEARCH



Second derivative

Second derivative approximations tables

© 2024 chempedia.info