Appearance energy determination

These ionization energies (IE) in fact refer to appearance energies determined by Schramm et al. [9]. For PETN, this corresponds to an ion with an miz value of 46 (which presumably corresponds to NO2 ). For RDX, the observed fragment ion is at mfz 128 (presumably corresponding to the loss of two HONO molecules from die charged parent ion). 

Potzinger and coworkers determined ionisation and appearance energies for the molecular and major fragment ions of several dialkylsulfoxides, R SOR (R =Me R = Me, Et, i-Pr, and i-pentyland R = R = Et or i-Pr). In addition to the evaluation of dissociation energies in the ions and their enthalpies of formation, a value of 280 + 30kJmol" for the C—S dissociation energy in neutral dialkyl sulfoxides was derived. 

The experimental approaches described above are examples of relative methods, wherein a thermochemical property is measured with respect to that of a standard, or an anchor. The quality of these measurements ultimately depends on the quality of the anchor. Alternatively, there are methods of determining thermochemical properties, in which the energy for a chemical process is measured on an absolute basis. Among the more common of these are the appearance energy measurements, in which the threshold energy for formation of an ionic fragment from an activated precursor is measured. There are mauy differeut methods of activation that can be used. Some of these are discussed here. 

An alternate positive ion approach, similar to that in Eq. 5.4a is to obtain a carbon-halogen BDE, R X, from which it is possible to obtain the enthalpy of formation of the radical from which the hydrocarbon BDE can be derived. The advantage of this approach is that it is easier to measure the R appearance energy from RX than it is from RH because of the weaker RX bond. However, a limitation of the approach is that the enthalpies of formation of organic halides, required to determine the enthalpies of formation of the cations, are generally not known as accurately as those for hydrocarbons. 

The Lozier tube, illustrated in Figure 3, has been used by several groups for a variety of different studies, including the determination of appearance energies and kinetic energies of ion fragments produced in electron impact-induced dissociation... 

The appearance energy (formerly known as appearance potential) is a widely used concept in threshold mass spectrometry experiments, which involve measuring the minimum energy required to cause a certain process. However, there are a number of theoretical and practical problems associated with the determination of reliable values of H o(A+/AB). In the following paragraphs we summarize the discussion of this subject made by the groups of Traeger for photoionization [64,65] and Holmes for electron impact [66]. 

A second likely error source in the experimental determination of the appearance energy has also a kinetic origin. As shown in figure 4.4, recombination of the products A+ and B may involve an activation barrier (Etec). Therefore, even if Akin = 0, when Eiec is not negligible the measured appearance energy will be an upper limit of the true (thermodynamic) value. 

As noted after equation 4.17, the procedure to evaluate standard enthalpies of formation from appearance energies is somewhat controversial. When the threshold energies are determined from electron impact experiments, it has been argued that the correction terms (H%9S - Hq)a+ + (77298 - o)b - 6.197 in equation 4.17 should not be included in the calculation [66], Consider, for instance, reactions 4.21, and 4.22 where the ion CH2OH+ was produced from the decomposition of 1-propanol or methanol. 

This experiment may be regarded as the forerunner of mass spectro-metric appearance-potential determination in that both are threshold techniques, that is they depend on slow variation in the energy supplied by the impacting electron until a change in the electron-molecule interaction is observed. Thus, just as the Hertz experiment did not distinguish between excitation and ionization potentials, mass spectrometric appearance potential measurements are subject to similar ambiguities in interpretation as between ionization and autoionization. 

In the first place, this chapter deals with the fundamentals of gas phase ion chemistry, i.e., with ionization, excitation, ion thermochemistry, ion lifetimes, and reaction rates of ion dissociation. The final sections are devoted to more practical aspects of gas phase ion chemistry such as the determination of ionization and appearance energies or of gas phase basicities and proton affinities. 

The techniques used for the determination of appearance energies are essentially identical to those described above for lEs. However, even when using the most accurately defined electron or photon energies, great care has to be taken when AEs are to be determined because of the risk of overestimation due to kinetic shift. Provided that there is no reverse activation energy for the reaction under study, the AE value also delivers the sum of heats of formation of the dissociation products. If substantial KER is observed, the AE may still be used to determine the activation energy of the process. 

The ionization potential of an electronically excited species may be lower than that of the ground-state species by as much as the excitation energy. Determination of the appearance potential for the mass 32 peak... 

---