Antisymmetric subspace

Special attention must be paid in systems of identical particles, where we have to take into account the symmetry postulate of quantum mechanics. This means that the space of states for fermions is the antisymmetric subspace of while the symmetric subspace dK+N refers to bosons. 

This rdation shows how the action of the antisymmetiizer can mix different orders in perturbation theory. Secondly, the projected functions Ag 0 > 0 > do not form an orthogonal set in the antisymmetric subspace of the Hilbert space L2(r3nj. jf excited states (a > and b > in order to obtain a complete... 

This relation shows how the action of the antisymmetrizer can mix different orders in perturbation theory. Secondly, the projected functions AglO ) 0 > do not form an orthogonal set in the antisymmetric subspace of the Hilbert space L2(r3N) if we take all excited states a > and b > in order to obtain a complete set a > b >, the projections As a > b > form a linearly dependent set. Expanding a given (antisymmetric) function in this overcomplete set is always possible, but the expansion coefficients are not uniquely defined. How the different symmetry adapted perturbation theories that have been formulated since the original treatment by Eisenschitz and London in 1930 , actually deal with these two problems can be read in the following reviews Usually, the first order interaction... 

The sets in (10.2.15) and (10.2.16) are respectively components of rank-2 symmetric and antisymmetric tensors there are m(m -l-1) components of the first type and 2>n(ni -1) of the second type, and the m -dimensional tensor space has in this way been reduced into symmetric and antisymmetric subspaces. 

The recursive projection procedure described above provides an alternative and potentially more efficient method for obtaining eigenstates than does the development of Eqs. (8) to (10). In the two-electron case, this procedure serves to separate the symmetric and antisymmetric subspaces spanned in the absence of unphysical representations, and can accelerate the convergence relative to that of Table II through incorporation of explicitly symmetric or antisymmetric test functions. In Figure 3 are shown and potential energy curves in H2 obtained from the recursive development and the basis states of Table I employing Heitler-London test functions in each case. These functions serve as appropriate chemical reference states... 

The sign A, as previously, denotes the antisymmetrized product of the multipliers following it. The functions T are taken as linear combinations of the Na-electron Slater determinants such that the occupied spin-orbitals in each Slater determinant are taken from the carrier subspace La-... 

The eigenvalue problem of the Hamiltonian operator (1) is defined in an infinite-dimensional Hilbert space Q and may be solved directly only for very few simple models. In order to find its bound-state solutions with energies not too distant from the ground-state it is reduced to the corresponding eigenvalue problem of a matrix representing H in a properly constructed finite-dimensional model space, a subspace of Q. Usually the model space is chosen to be spanned by TV-electron antisymmetrized and spin-adapted products of orthonormal spinorbitals. In such a case it is known as the full configuration interaction (FCI) space [8, 15]. The model space Hk N, K, S, M) may be defined as the antisymmetric part of the TV-fold tensorial product of a one-electron space... 

The outline of the review is as follows in the next section (Sect. 2) we introduce the basic ideas of effective Hamiltonian theory based on the use of projection operators. The effective Hamiltonian (1-5) for the ligand field problem is constructed in several steps first by analogy with r-electron theory we use the group product function method of Lykos and Parr to define a set of n-electron wavefimctions which define a subspace of the full -particle Hilbert space in which we can give a detailed analysis of the Schrodinger equation for the full molecular Hamiltonian H (Sect. 3 and 4). This subspace consists of fully antisymmetrized product wavefimctions composed of a fixed ground state wavefunction, for the electrons in the molecule other than the electrons which are placed in states, constructed out of pure d-orbitals on the... 

In this expression, hp = pW q) represeiits a matrix element of the one-electron component of the Hamiltonian, h, while (pqWrs) s ( lcontains general annihilation and creation operators (e.g., or ) that may act on orbitals in either occupied or virtual subspaces. The cluster operators, T , on the other hand, contain operators that are restricted to act in only one of these spaces (e.g., al, which may act only on the virtual orbitals). As pointed out earlier, the cluster operators therefore commute with one another, but not with the Hamiltonian, f . For example, consider the commutator of the pair of general second-quantized operators from the one-electron component of the Hamiltonian in Eq. [53] with the single-excitation pair found in the cluster operator, Tj ... 

Finally, one other non-linear wavefunction expansion will be described. If the geminals of the different electron pairs are further restricted to be identical for each electron pair, then the result is called the antisymmetrized product of identical geminals (APIG) wavefunctionThere are only (n—1) parameters in the APIG wavefunction which spans a subspace of the GP wavefunction space. Because of the severely restrictive form of this wavefunction, it has not been used extensively for MCSCF calculations but it has been used as a reference function for propagator calculationsfor which this wavefunction form has formal appeal. 

Pauli s exclusion principle imposes that either (ri, r2) or x(si, S2) must be odd (the other one remaining even) with respect to the interchange of indices 1 and 2. If the Coulomb repulsion t/(ri, r2) = e /47reo ri - r2 between both electrons is small, this contribution to the Hamiltonian H may be considered as a perturbation. Let (Pair) (respectively, b(r)) be the eigenstate of the Hamiltonian Hi = Ti =p l2m (respectively, H2 = T2 =p /2m) characterized by the eigenvalue (respectively, E, ). In this framework, this approximation allows us to solve the well-known secular equation det(H - El) = 0 (where 1 is the identity matrix and H=Ti + T2 + U(ri, V2)). hi the subspace spanned by the spatially symmetrical and antisymmetrical wave functions (Psiri, V2) and (Phiri, V2) containing functions a(ri) and hiri), we have ... 

From the above result, it could be inferred exactly that such irreducible subspaces of the state space establish the proper mathematical domain of the classical physical field quantities. In fact, the demonstration was undertaken by using a relativistic electromagnetic field tensor, F,y, and its antisymmetric property ... 

We will now derive a Dyson equation by expressing the inverse matrix of the extended two-particle Green s function Qr,y, u ) by a matrix representation of the extended operator H. We already mentioned that the primary set of states l rs) spans a subspace (the model spaice) of the Hilbert space Y. Since the states IVrs) are /r-orthonormal they are also linearly independent and thus form a basis of this subspace. Here and in the following the set of pairs of singleparticle indices (r, s) has to be restricted to r > s for the pp and hh cases (b) and (c) where the states are antisymmetric under permutation of r and s. No restriction applies in the ph case (a). The primary set of states Yr ) can now be extended to a complete basis Qj D Yr ) of the Hilbert space Y. We may further demand that the states Qj) are /r-orthonormal ... 

This matrix may be factorized by spin and space symmetries into a onedimensional triplet antisymmetric, a one-dimensional singlet antisymmetric and a two-dimensional singlet symmetric subspaces... 

This description of the ligand field potential is not valid when the chelating molecule has an extended rr-electron system such as, for example, the acetylace-tonate anion or 2,2 -bipyridine. In such cases the frontier molecular orbital of a symmetric chelate can be classified within Qu symmetry as illustrated in Fig. 7 other properties of the chelate bridge will not be considered. The particular MO is either symmetric (x-type) or antisymmetric ( p-type) with respect to the Q-axis. Since combination with metal d-functions can take place only within the same subspace of symmetry, the tetragonally quantized t2y-wavefunctions have to be transformed according to Qw This can easily be achieved by applying the transformation matrix... 

---