Anti interactions

Figure 3.60 Vicinal no ucH interaction for the pi-type lone pair of methanol, showing the equivalence of syn and anti interactions.

The tau bond model appears to provide a quick and easy explanation. An anti interaction between each of the breaking bonds and the lower tau bond leads overall to a syn selective reaction for each diastereoisomer. 

Identify carbon atoms in the chair conformation of methylcyclohexane that have intramolecular interactions corresponding to those found in the gauche and anti conformations of butane. Which of the chair conformations has the greatest number of gauche interactions How many more If we assume, as in the case for butane, that the anti interaction is 3.8 kJ mol more favorable than gawc/ie, then what is the relative stability of the two chair conformations of methylcyclohexane Hint Identify the relative number of gauche interactions in the two conformations. 

When the overlap between the wavefiinctions of the interacting molecules cannot be neglected, the zeroth-order wavefiinction must be anti-symmetrized with respect to all die electrons. The requirement of anti-synmietrization brmgs with it some difficult problems. If electrons have been assigned to individual molecules... 

For acyclic fragments and molecules, the principle of longest pathways has been implemented in CORINA (sec Figure 2-95) i.e., since no ch configuration is specified, all torsions arc set to anti in order to minimize steric interactions. 

The origin of a torsional barrier can be studied best in simple cases like ethane. Here, rotation about the central carbon-carbon bond results in three staggered and three eclipsed stationary points on the potential energy surface, at least when symmetry considerations are not taken into account. Quantum mechanically, the barrier of rotation is explained by anti-bonding interactions between the hydrogens attached to different carbon atoms. These interactions are small when the conformation of ethane is staggered, and reach a maximum value when the molecule approaches an eclipsed geometry. 

A more eflicient and general synthetic procedure is the Masamune reaction of aldehydes with boron enolates of chiral a-silyloxy ketones. A double asymmetric induction generates two new chiral centres with enantioselectivities > 99%. It is again explained by a chair-like six-centre transition state. The repulsive interactions of the bulky cyclohexyl group with the vinylic hydrogen and the boron ligands dictate the approach of the enolate to the aldehyde (S. Masamune, 1981 A). The fi-hydroxy-x-methyl ketones obtained are pure threo products (threo = threose- or threonine-like Fischer formula also termed syn" = planar zig-zag chain with substituents on one side), and the reaction has successfully been applied to macrolide syntheses (S. Masamune, 1981 B). Optically pure threo (= syn") 8-hydroxy-a-methyl carboxylic acids are obtained by desilylation and periodate oxidation (S. Masamune, 1981 A). Chiral 0-((S)-trans-2,5-dimethyl-l-borolanyl) ketene thioketals giving pure erythro (= anti ) diastereomers have also been developed by S. Masamune (1986). 

Anti-SCF antibody similarly abrogates Hpopolysaccharide- and IL-l-induced radioprotection (170) and sensitized mice to radiation. Such effects are not obtained using anti-IL-3, anti-IL-4, or anti-GM-CSF antibodies. SCF, IL-1, IL-6, and TNF- a have acknowledged interactive roles in the normal... 

Stabilization of the syn conformer in the gas phase is explained rather intuitively in terms of the extra stabilization due to increased interactions between the H atom in the OH group and the O atom in C=0 group. As one can see in Figure 5, the extra stabilization in the anti confonner in aqueous solution arises from the solvation energy, especially at the carbonyl oxygen site. 

Attack ty acetate at C-1 of C-2 would be equally likely and would result in equal amounts of the enantiomeric acetates. The acetate ester would be exo because reaction must occur from the direction opposite the bridging interaction. The nonclassical ion can be formed directly only from the exo-brosylate because it has the proper anti relationship between the C(l)—C(6) bond and the leaving group. The bridged ion can be formed from the endo-brosylate only after an unassisted ionization. This would explain the rate difference between the exo and endo isomers. 

Anti stereochemistry can be explained by a mechanism in which the alkene interacts simultaneously with the proton-donating hydrogen halide and with a source of halide ion, either a second molecule of hydrogen halide or a free halide ion. The anti stereochemistry is consistent with the expectation that the attack of halide ion would be from the opposite... 

Computational investigations of vinylsilanes indicate that there is a groimd-state interaction between the alkene n oibital and the carbon-silicon bond which raises the energy of the n HOMO and enhances reactivity. Furthermore, this stereoelectronic interaction favors attack of the electrophile anti to the silyl substituent. 

It IS likely that the syn selectivity exhibited in cycloadditions of fluoroallene IS due to electrostatic interactions [23 25] As in the case of difluoroallene the reactions of fluoroallene with diazoalkanes and nitrile oxides are facile, but such reactions, other than that shown in equation 18, are neither regio nor stereospeutic [23, 25] Indeed, the addition of phenylnitrile oxide to fluoroallene occurs with preferential anti addition for both regioisomenc products (equation 20)... 

Examine space-filling models for the two conformers and identify any likely unfavorable nonbonded interactions. Based on steric effects, which conformer would you anticipate would be the more stable Compare energies of anti-1,2-ethanediol and gauche-1,2-ethanediol to see if you are correct. Is this the same ordering of conformer energies as seen for n-butane (see Chapter 5, Problem 3)7... 

Display electrostatic potential maps for both anti and gauche conformers of 1,2-ethanediol. Do you see any examples of destabilizing interactions (between like charges) or stabilizing interactions (between unlike charges) in either conformer Are you able to explain the observed conformational preference ... 

---