Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Selectivity anti-Cram

Chelation Control Model- "Anti-Cram" selectivity... [Pg.92]

In fact, the highest anti-Cram selectivity reported to date (96% de) was observed with the MAT-mediated addition of methylmagnesium bromide to 2-(l-cyclohexenyl)propanal3 i 36. The stereochemical outcome of this addition reaction can be explained as follows on treatment of the carbonyl compound with the large aluminum reagent, the sterically least hindered complex 9 is formed. Subsequent addition of the nucleophile from the side opposite to the bulky aluminum reagent produces the anti-Cram diastereomer preferentially. [Pg.35]

With a-alkyl-substituted chiral carbonyl compounds bearing an alkoxy group in the -position, the diastereoselectivity of nucleophilic addition reactions is influenced not only by steric factors, which can be described by the models of Cram and Felkin (see Section 1.3.1.1.), but also by a possible coordination of the nucleophile counterion with the /J-oxygen atom. Thus, coordination of the metal cation with the carbonyl oxygen and the /J-alkoxy substituent leads to a chelated transition state 1 which implies attack of the nucleophile from the least hindered side, opposite to the pseudoequatorial substituent R1. Therefore, the anb-diastereomer 2 should be formed in excess. With respect to the stereogenic center in the a-position, the predominant formation of the anft-diastereomer means that anti-Cram selectivity has occurred. [Pg.36]

In contrast to the results obtained with the jS-alkoxy-a-alkyl-y-lactol 16 (vide supra), a chelation-directed, anti-Cram selective nucleophilic addition to the a-methyl-y-lactol 1 was not only observed with methyllithium and methylmagnesium bromide but also with (triisopropoxy)methyl-titanium72. In fact, the highest diastereoselectivity (> 98 % de) was observed with the titanium reagent in dichloromethane as reaction solvent. A seven-membered chelate 3 with the a-methyl substituent in a pscudoequatorial position has been postulated in order to explain the stereochemical outcome. [Pg.41]

Methylmagnesium chloride has been added to various d-(4-substituted-phenyl) <5-oxo esters 15 (X = H, Cl 13, F, Cl, Br, OC11,) which provides the diastereomeric -lactones 1642. The electronic properties of the phenyl 4-substituent have no significant influence on the diastereoselectivity. Except for the 4-methoxyphenyl compound, which is unreactive even at 60 °C, a ratio of ca. 40 60 in favor of the anti-Cram product is observed at 60 "C in tetrahydrofuran as reaction solvent. Lowering the reaction temperature to 0 °C slightly increases the anti-Cram selectivity in the case of the 4-fluoro-, 4-chloro-, and 4-bromo-substituted compounds. On the other hand, a complete loss of reactivity is observed with the <5-phenyl- and <5-(4-methylphenyl)-substituted h-oxo esters. [Pg.44]

Normally, the addition of C-nucleophiles to chiral a-alkoxyaldehydes in organic solvents is opposite to Cram s rule (Scheme 8.15). The anti-Cram selectivity has been rationalized on the basis of chelation control.142 The same anti preference was observed in the reactions of a-alkoxyaldehydes with allyl bromide/indium in water.143 However, for the allylation of a-hydroxyaldehydes with allyl bromide/indium, the syn isomer is the major product. The syn selectivity can be as high as 10 1 syn anti) in the reaction of arabinose. It is argued that in this case, the allylindium intermediate coordinates with both the hydroxy and the carbonyl function leading to the syn adduct. [Pg.246]

The Reason for Cram and Anti-Cram Selectivity and for Felkin-Anh and Cram Chelate Selectivity Transition State Models... [Pg.412]

In additions of hydride donors to a-chiral carbonyl compounds, whether Cram or anti-Cram selectivity, or Felkin-Anh or Cram chelate selectivity occurs is the result of kinetic control. The rate-determining step in either of these additions is the formation of a tetrahedral intermediate. It takes place irreversibly. The tetrahedral intermediate that is accessible via the most stable transition state is produced most rapidly. However, in contrast to what is found in many other considerations in this book, this intermediate does not represent a good transition state model for its formation reaction. The reason for this deviation is that it is produced in an... [Pg.412]

Whether, in additions of hydride donors to a-chiral carbonyl compounds, Cram or anti-Cram selectivity, on the one hand, or Felkin-Anh or Cram chelate selectivity, on the... [Pg.314]

In the alkylation of a-chiral aldehydes with no ability to chelate with organometal-lic compounds such as Grignard reagents, erythro alcohols are usually obtained preferentially according to the Cram s rule [127], and high Cram selectivity can be achieved with alkyltitanium reagents developed by Reetz [128]. In contrast, application of amphiphilic alkylation to a-chiral aldehydes enables one to achieve the hitherto difficult anti-Cram selectivity, affording threo alcohols selectively as shown in Sch. 91 [125]. [Pg.240]

Entries 1-4 in Table 3 illustrate the tendency for a Cram selective process in additions to aldehydes of type (4 equation 1). In contrast, when (4) is treated with the aluminum additive (1) prior to exposure to organometallics, the nucleophilic addition results in an anti-Cram product. The resulting facial selectivity may be most easily rationalized by considering transition state structure (6), which defmes the anti-Cram face of the aldehyde to be less hindered by virtue of precoordination of the aluminum reagent (1) to the less sterically demanding Cram face. For example, comparison of entries 2, 6 and 9 to the corresponding entries 5, 8 and 10 in Table 3 illustrates the dranuitic effect that the aluminum additive (1) has on the facial selectivity of the reaction. This approach to anti-Cram selectivity, however, does suffer... [Pg.80]

Tables Cram versus Anti-Cram Selectivity for the Addition of Organometallics to Aldehyde (4) in the... Tables Cram versus Anti-Cram Selectivity for the Addition of Organometallics to Aldehyde (4) in the...
It is more difficult to account for the remarkable anti-Cram selectivity observed in the MAT-mediated nucleophilic additions to a-chiral aldehydes, although out of plane coordination may play an important role (Figure 49). ... [Pg.316]


See other pages where Selectivity anti-Cram is mentioned: [Pg.92]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.362]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.362]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.314 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.262 ]




SEARCH



Anti-Cram

Anti-selectivities

Cram selectivity

© 2024 chempedia.info